luxcorerender 5600x AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1804 BIOS) and XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1804 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-48-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1804 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-48-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1804 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 1000GB Samsung SSD 980 PRO 1TB, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-48-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: DLSC - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.64 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.63 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.63 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Danish Mood - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.10 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.09 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.10 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Orange Juice - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.51 |===================================================================== 2 . 2.50 |===================================================================== 3 . 2.49 |==================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: LuxCore Benchmark - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.24 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.23 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.24 |===================================================================== LuxCoreRender 2.5 Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism - Acceleration: CPU M samples/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.87 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.87 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.87 |===================================================================== Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 12 digit Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.089 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.104 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.080 |==================================================================== Helsing 1.0-beta Digit Range: 14 digit Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 692.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 690.75 |=================================================================== 3 . 691.68 |=================================================================== SecureMark 1.0.4 Benchmark: SecureMark-TLS marks > Higher Is Better 1 . 316740 |=================================================================== 2 . 314773 |================================================================== 3 . 317821 |===================================================================