9900k test

Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 CFL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2103294-IB-9900KTEST23
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

HPC - High Performance Computing 2 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1
March 28 2021
  57 Minutes
2
March 29 2021
  57 Minutes
3
March 29 2021
  1 Hour, 1 Minute
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  58 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

9900k test Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 CFL GT2 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 CFL GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 CFL GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 CFL GT2 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: S3D GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 18.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.15 |==================================================================== 3 . 18.21 |==================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14.83 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.44 |================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: FFT SP GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.45 |==================================================================== 2 . 15.43 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.43 |==================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: MD5 Hash GHash/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.3861 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.3861 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.3861 |=================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Reduction GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37.30 |================================================================== 2 . 38.23 |==================================================================== 3 . 38.18 |==================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: GEMM SGEMM_N GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 232.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 231.64 |=================================================================== 3 . 227.04 |================================================================= SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Max SP Flops GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1762.71 |================================================================== 2 . 1762.05 |================================================================== 3 . 1761.20 |================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Download GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 29.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 28.67 |=================================================================== 3 . 28.81 |=================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Bus Speed Readback GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 28.71 |=================================================================== 2 . 29.00 |==================================================================== 3 . 29.17 |==================================================================== SHOC Scalable HeterOgeneous Computing 2020-04-17 Target: OpenCL - Benchmark: Texture Read Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.84 |==================================================================== 2 . 56.72 |==================================================================== 3 . 56.84 |==================================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 129 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 38.44 |=================================================================== 2 . 38.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 38.00 |================================================================== Xcompact3d Incompact3d 2021-03-11 Input: input.i3d 193 Cells Per Direction Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 135.33 |=================================================================== 2 . 135.26 |=================================================================== 3 . 135.31 |=================================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.2.1 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 6262.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 6251.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 6262.6 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 112.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 112.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 112.88 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: KASUMI - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 107.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 107.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 107.82 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4800.93 |================================================================== 2 . 4800.03 |================================================================== 3 . 4799.77 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: AES-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4800.05 |================================================================== 2 . 4800.42 |================================================================== 3 . 4799.70 |================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 435.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 435.61 |=================================================================== 3 . 435.61 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Twofish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 437.44 |=================================================================== 2 . 437.38 |=================================================================== 3 . 437.34 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 542.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 542.75 |=================================================================== 3 . 543.05 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: Blowfish - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 538.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 538.88 |=================================================================== 3 . 538.90 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 171.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 171.62 |=================================================================== 3 . 171.72 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: CAST-256 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 171.30 |=================================================================== 2 . 171.79 |=================================================================== 3 . 171.97 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 914.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 912.11 |=================================================================== 3 . 914.00 |=================================================================== Botan 2.17.3 Test: ChaCha20Poly1305 - Decrypt MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 907.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 905.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 906.74 |===================================================================