Intel Graphics Intel Core i9-10900K testing with a Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F20d BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel CometLake-S GT2 [UHD 630] 3GB on Ubuntu 21.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
HTML result view exported from: https://openbenchmarking.org/result/2103215-IB-INTELGRAP65&grw .
Intel Graphics Processor Motherboard Chipset Memory Disk Graphics Audio Monitor Network OS Kernel Desktop Display Server OpenGL OpenCL Compiler File-System Screen Resolution Core i9 10900K Intel Core i9-10900K @ 5.30GHz (10 Cores / 20 Threads) Gigabyte Z490 AORUS MASTER (F20d BIOS) Intel Comet Lake PCH 16GB 1000GB Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 1TB + 2000GB Gigabyte Intel CometLake-S GT2 [UHD 630] 3GB (1200MHz) Realtek ALC1220 DELL P2415Q Intel I225-V + Intel Comet Lake PCH CNVi WiFi Ubuntu 21.04 5.12.0-051200rc3daily20210315-generic (x86_64) 20210314 GNOME Shell 3.38.3 X Server 1.20.9 + Wayland 4.6 Mesa 21.1.0-devel (git-616720d 2021-03-16 hirsute-oibaf-ppa) OpenCL 3.0 GCC 10.2.1 20210312 ext4 3840x2160 OpenBenchmarking.org - Transparent Huge Pages: madvise - DEBUGINFOD_URLS= - --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-bootstrap --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,m2 --enable-libphobos-checking=release --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-link-mutex --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-10-p9aljy/gcc-10-10.2.1/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,amdgcn-amdhsa=/build/gcc-10-p9aljy/gcc-10-10.2.1/debian/tmp-gcn/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - Scaling Governor: intel_pstate powersave - CPU Microcode: 0xe2 - Thermald 2.4.3 - GLAMOR - Python 3.9.2 - itlb_multihit: KVM: Mitigation of VMX disabled + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected
Intel Graphics tesseract: 1920 x 1080 tesseract: 3840 x 2160 basemark: OpenGL - 1920 x 1080 - Medium xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - High xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultra xonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimate unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Low - OpenGL unigine-super: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen - Medium - OpenGL paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 gputest: Furmark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen paraview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160 basemark: OpenGL - 2560 x 1440 - High basemark: Vulkan - 1920 x 1080 - Medium paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160 etlegacy: 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 gputest: TessMark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160 basemark: OpenGL - 2560 x 1440 - Medium basemark: Vulkan - 1920 x 1080 - High basemark: Vulkan - 2560 x 1440 - High gputest: Furmark - 3840 x 2160 - Fullscreen basemark: Vulkan - 2560 x 1440 - Medium paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 basemark: OpenGL - 1920 x 1080 - High gputest: GiMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen gputest: TessMark - 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreen paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160 paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 68.81241 24.40777 57.41 42.5724451 32.8037139 24.8280057 4.5 1.9 6.45 227 646.310 5.81 8.53 68.77 582.581 50.8 37.36 1595 389.316 18.63 194.131 41.45 12.85 8.72 227 45.16 22.37 12.46 826 1596 357.856 10.33 165.235 OpenBenchmarking.org
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.05, N = 3 68.81
Tesseract Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 24.41
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 13 26 39 52 65 SE +/- 0.11, N = 3 57.41 MIN: 24.63 / MAX: 109.7
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Core i9 10900K 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 42.57 MIN: 21 / MAX: 54
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Core i9 10900K 8 16 24 32 40 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 32.80 MIN: 15 / MAX: 48
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Core i9 10900K 6 12 18 24 30 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 24.83 MIN: 12 / MAX: 40
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Core i9 10900K 1.0125 2.025 3.0375 4.05 5.0625 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 4.5 MAX: 5.4
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Core i9 10900K 0.4275 0.855 1.2825 1.71 2.1375 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 1.9 MAX: 2.2
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 6.45
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 50 100 150 200 250 227
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 140 280 420 560 700 SE +/- 1.52, N = 3 646.31
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 1.3073 2.6146 3.9219 5.2292 6.5365 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 5.81
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.01, N = 3 8.53 MIN: 6.41 / MAX: 12.52
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 15 30 45 60 75 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 68.77 MIN: 34.77 / MAX: 156.01
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 130 260 390 520 650 SE +/- 1.12, N = 3 582.58
ET: Legacy Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.77 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 11 22 33 44 55 SE +/- 0.13, N = 3 50.8
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.09, N = 3 37.36
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 300 600 900 1200 1500 1595
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.96, N = 3 389.32
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.03, N = 3 18.63
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.28, N = 3 194.13
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 9 18 27 36 45 SE +/- 0.06, N = 3 41.45 MIN: 28.56 / MAX: 68.85
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.02, N = 3 12.85 MIN: 10.46 / MAX: 20.35
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 2 4 6 8 10 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 8.72 MIN: 7.38 / MAX: 12.4
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 50 100 150 200 250 227
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 10 20 30 40 50 SE +/- 0.07, N = 3 45.16 MIN: 26.99 / MAX: 93.17
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 5 10 15 20 25 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 22.37
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 12.46 MIN: 9.29 / MAX: 20.83
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 200 400 600 800 1000 826
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 300 600 900 1200 1500 1596
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 80 160 240 320 400 SE +/- 0.63, N = 3 357.86
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 SE +/- 0.00, N = 3 10.33
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 40 80 120 160 200 SE +/- 0.04, N = 3 165.24
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Core i9 10900K 0.5423 1.0846 1.6269 2.1692 2.7115 2.41
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.8 17.7 37.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Core i9 10900K 0.4118 0.8236 1.2354 1.6472 2.059 1.83
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.7 17.9 37.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
Xonotic Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Core i9 10900K 0.3173 0.6346 0.9519 1.2692 1.5865 1.41
Xonotic CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Xonotic 0.8.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Core i9 10900K 8 16 24 32 40 Min: 0.69 / Avg: 17.63 / Max: 37.54
ET: Legacy Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better ET: Legacy 2.77 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 0.612 1.224 1.836 2.448 3.06 2.72
ET: Legacy CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.7 18.7 35.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ET: Legacy 2.77 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Tesseract Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 0.918 1.836 2.754 3.672 4.59 4.08
Tesseract CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.7 16.9 32.9 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Tesseract Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 0.324 0.648 0.972 1.296 1.62 1.44
Tesseract CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 17.0 33.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Tesseract 2014-05-12 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 0.1823 0.3646 0.5469 0.7292 0.9115 0.81
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 15.9 33.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 1.0215 2.043 3.0645 4.086 5.1075 4.54
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 15.2 28.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 0.1215 0.243 0.3645 0.486 0.6075 0.54
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor Core i9 10900K 7 14 21 28 35 Min: 1.02 / Avg: 16.14 / Max: 29.73
Basemark GPU Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: Vulkan - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 0.6525 1.305 1.9575 2.61 3.2625 2.90
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 15.6 22.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 0.1643 0.3286 0.4929 0.6572 0.8215 0.73
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 17.1 34.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 0.9765 1.953 2.9295 3.906 4.8825 4.34
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 13.2 35.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: High Core i9 10900K 0.1148 0.2296 0.3444 0.4592 0.574 0.51
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 16.7 36.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Basemark GPU Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium OpenBenchmarking.org FPS Per Watt, More Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 Renderer: OpenGL - Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Graphics Preset: Medium Core i9 10900K 0.621 1.242 1.863 2.484 3.105 2.76
Basemark GPU CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 15.0 28.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Basemark GPU 1.2 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 9 18 27 36 45
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Core i9 10900K 0.0563 0.1126 0.1689 0.2252 0.2815 0.25
Unigine Superposition CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 18.1 35.3 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
Unigine Superposition Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL OpenBenchmarking.org Frames Per Second Per Watt, More Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Medium - Renderer: OpenGL Core i9 10900K 0.0248 0.0496 0.0744 0.0992 0.124 0.11
Unigine Superposition CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.7 18.0 40.2 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better Unigine Superposition 1.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 8 16 24 32 40 33.15
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 19.5 68.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ParaView Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 7 14 21 28 35 28.43
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.9 20.5 76.0 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 20 40 60 80 100
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 5 10 15 20 25 18.29
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 21.3 37.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ParaView Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiPolys / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 9.59
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.1 20.3 41.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Core i9 10900K 6 12 18 24 30 25.61
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 14.0 34.4 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 10 20 30 40 50
ParaView Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 OpenBenchmarking.org MiVoxels / Sec Per Watt, More Is Better ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 10.85
ParaView CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.1 15.2 41.1 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better ParaView 5.9 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 11 22 33 44 55
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points Per Watt, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 12.48
GpuTest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 18.2 21.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
GpuTest Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points Per Watt, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 3 6 9 12 15 11.93
GpuTest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 19.0 22.5 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points Per Watt, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 20 40 60 80 100 85.88
GpuTest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.9 18.6 20.8 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
GpuTest Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points Per Watt, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 20 40 60 80 100 85.40
GpuTest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 0.9 18.7 21.7 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
GpuTest Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen OpenBenchmarking.org Points Per Watt, More Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen Core i9 10900K 11 22 33 44 55 49.38
GpuTest CPU Power Consumption Monitor Min Avg Max Core i9 10900K 1.0 16.7 19.6 OpenBenchmarking.org Watts, Fewer Is Better GpuTest 0.7.0 CPU Power Consumption Monitor 6 12 18 24 30
Phoronix Test Suite v10.8.5