ol79-fw4 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 testing with a Cisco UCSB-B200-M4 (B200M4.3.1.3i.0.032120171710 BIOS) and Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot] on OracleServer 7.9 via the Phoronix Test Suite. OL 79 FW4: Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 @ 3.30GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Cisco UCSB-B200-M4 (B200M4.3.1.3i.0.032120171710 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16 x 32 GB DDR4-2133MT/s M393A4K40BB0-CPB, Disk: 12 x 54GB FlashArray + 12 x 322GB FlashArray, Graphics: Matrox MGA G200e [Pilot], Network: Cisco VIC NIC OS: OracleServer 7.9, Kernel: 5.4.17-2011.6.2.el7uek.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Driver: matrox, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 21.54 |============================================================ BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 2078393 |========================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 27768 |============================================================ ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 574475 |=========================================================== Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.17663737 |======================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.00156033 |======================================================= OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 3148.5 |=========================================================== Apache CouchDB 3.1.1 Bulk Size: 100 - Inserts: 1000 - Rounds: 24 Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 113.96 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 18419 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.054 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 974 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1.027 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 430081 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.116 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 423918 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.236 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 428343 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.584 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1490 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 33.57 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 13843 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.072 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1458 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 68.63 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1363 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 183.49 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 928 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1.078 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 352187 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.142 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 13602 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.074 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 362795 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.276 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 352102 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.710 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 14154 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 3.538 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 834 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1.199 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 341148 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.147 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 12443 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.080 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 14876 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 6.973 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 16751 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 15.13 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 349865 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.286 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 335162 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.746 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 8960 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 5.583 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 648 |============================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1.544 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 326899 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.153 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 10485 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 9.546 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 11229 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 22.32 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 335676 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.298 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 314685 |=========================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 0.795 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 9116 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 5.492 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 9504 |============================================================= PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 10.53 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 10494 |============================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 23.84 |============================================================ SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 99.32 |============================================================ Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1511326.59 |======================================================= Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Reads Op/s > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 32286 |============================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 185502 |=========================================================== Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:1 Op/s > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 8028 |============================================================= Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Mixed 1:3 Op/s > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 4028 |============================================================= NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 24412.61 |========================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 6745 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 147 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 21000 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 189 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 56161 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 283 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 77699 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 409 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 87328 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 728 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 85790 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Increment - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1484 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 8005 |============================================================= Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 124 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 39372 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 100 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 119522 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 132 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 164618 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 192 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 204883 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 64 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 309 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 67790 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 1 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 14 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 208871 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 4 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 29 |=============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 231991 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Read - Clients: 128 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 551 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 278124 |=========================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 16 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 126 |============================================================== Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Rows Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 82497 |============================================================ Apache HBase 2.2.3 Test: Random Write - Clients: 32 Microseconds - Average Latency < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 387 |============================================================== Apache Benchmark 2.4.29 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 21314.59 |========================================================= Apache Siege 2.4.29 Concurrent Users: 250 Transactions Per Second > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 29243.23 |========================================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 166990 |=========================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1.606 |============================================================ PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 7.878 |============================================================ InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1107675.2 |======================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1113904 |========================================================== InfluxDB 1.8.2 Concurrent Streams: 1024 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000 val/sec > Higher Is Better OL 79 FW4 . 1102616.8 |========================================================