Core i7 10700T Garage Intel Core i7-10700T testing on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB DDR4-2667MT/s M4S0-AGS1O5IK, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB DDR4-2667MT/s M4S0-AGS1O5IK, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 2 x 16384 MB DDR4-2667MT/s M4S0-AGS1O5IK, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-43-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4 HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.38656 |================================================================== 2 . 2.40233 |================================================================== 3 . 2.40251 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.13248 |================================================================== 2 . 3.13059 |================================================================== 3 . 3.12889 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.82500 |================================================================== 2 . 1.81229 |================================================================= 3 . 1.83458 |================================================================== High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.13935 |================================================================== 2 . 4.15078 |================================================================== 3 . 4.15057 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 41.10 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.33 |==================================================================== 3 . 41.25 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.18057 |================================================================== 2 . 4.19489 |================================================================== 3 . 4.17646 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.67608 |================================================================= 2 . 6.73621 |================================================================== 3 . 6.73862 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.02931 |================================================================== 2 . 0.02945 |================================================================== 3 . 0.02942 |================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 273 |====================================================================== 2 . 273 |====================================================================== 3 . 272 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 388 |====================================================================== 2 . 390 |====================================================================== 3 . 386 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 43 |======================================================================= 2 . 43 |======================================================================= 3 . 43 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 12519 |==================================================================== 2 . 12530 |==================================================================== 3 . 12336 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 2894 |===================================================================== 2 . 2903 |===================================================================== 3 . 2884 |===================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 194.18 |=================================================================== 2 . 194.43 |=================================================================== 3 . 194.18 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 140.66 |=================================================================== 2 . 140.95 |=================================================================== 3 . 138.89 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 159.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 158.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 159.00 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7603.79 |================================================================== 2 . 7553.85 |================================================================= 3 . 7645.87 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1013.02 |================================================================== 2 . 1012.53 |================================================================== 3 . 988.10 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 428473 |=================================================================== 2 . 431310 |=================================================================== 3 . 423407 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1256.67 |================================================================== 2 . 1211.83 |================================================================ 3 . 1215.14 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 33400 |==================================================================== 2 . 33380 |==================================================================== 3 . 33187 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10840 |==================================================================== 2 . 10840 |==================================================================== 3 . 10847 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23503 |================================================================= 2 . 23540 |================================================================= 3 . 24530 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 47283 |=================================================================== 2 . 46807 |================================================================== 3 . 48327 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 63713 |============================================================== 2 . 69831 |==================================================================== 3 . 63090 |============================================================= Stream-Dynamic 1.0 - Copy MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23494.02 |================================================================= 2 . 23515.21 |================================================================= 3 . 23532.01 |================================================================= Stream-Dynamic 1.0 - Scale MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23515.39 |================================================================= 2 . 23520.91 |================================================================= 3 . 23570.49 |================================================================= Stream-Dynamic 1.0 - Add MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 26716.60 |================================================================= 2 . 26664.09 |================================================================= 3 . 26664.64 |================================================================= Stream-Dynamic 1.0 - Triad MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 26676.72 |================================================================= 2 . 26628.33 |================================================================= 3 . 26631.60 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13427.35 |================================================================ 2 . 13642.75 |================================================================= 3 . 13546.42 |================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37 |======================================================================= 2 . 37 |======================================================================= 3 . 37 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102 |====================================================================== 2 . 102 |====================================================================== 3 . 102 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 458 |====================================================================== 2 . 458 |====================================================================== 3 . 457 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1568 |===================================================================== 2 . 1566 |===================================================================== 3 . 1567 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 80 |======================================================================= 2 . 80 |======================================================================= 3 . 80 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1688 |===================================================================== 2 . 1688 |===================================================================== 3 . 1688 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 99 |======================================================================= 2 . 99 |======================================================================= 3 . 99 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 456 |====================================================================== 2 . 456 |====================================================================== 3 . 456 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 421 |====================================================================== 2 . 421 |====================================================================== 3 . 420 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 576 |====================================================================== 2 . 577 |====================================================================== 3 . 577 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 169 |====================================================================== 2 . 169 |====================================================================== 3 . 169 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 671 |====================================================================== 2 . 669 |====================================================================== 3 . 670 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 218 |====================================================================== 2 . 217 |====================================================================== 3 . 217 |====================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2092.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 2086.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 2082.0 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1198.57 |================================================================== 2 . 1198.45 |================================================================== 3 . 1198.45 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1776.52 |================================================================== 2 . 1776.28 |================================================================== 3 . 1777.01 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1360.77 |================================================================== 2 . 1342.48 |================================================================= 3 . 1360.77 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2118.78 |================================================================== 2 . 2124.41 |================================================================== 3 . 2124.41 |================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 54.15 |==================================================================== 2 . 54.52 |==================================================================== 3 . 54.49 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.51 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.52 |===================================================================== 3 . 7.52 |===================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.68 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.68 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.68 |===================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 54.17 |==================================================================== 2 . 53.81 |==================================================================== 3 . 53.79 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 53.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 53.70 |==================================================================== 3 . 53.70 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.27 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.27 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.30 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding 0.3.1 CPU Threads: 1 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 36.22 |==================================================================== 2 . 36.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 36.33 |==================================================================== JPEG XL Decoding 0.3.1 CPU Threads: All MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 155.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 156.71 |=================================================================== 3 . 156.67 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1776.96 |================================================================== 2 . 1781.04 |================================================================== 3 . 1772.99 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1929.38 |================================================================== 2 . 1943.74 |================================================================== 3 . 1934.21 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1147.32 |================================================================== 2 . 1128.89 |================================================================= 3 . 1148.80 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 285.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 286.16 |=================================================================== 3 . 286.18 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 158.50 |=================================================================== 2 . 158.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 158.45 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 266.47 |=================================================================== 2 . 263.01 |================================================================== 3 . 267.31 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4801.12 |================================================================== 2 . 4789.42 |================================================================== 3 . 4803.45 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 901.18 |================================================================= 2 . 926.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 929.91 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 825.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 831.34 |=================================================================== 3 . 797.77 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11013.57 |================================================================ 2 . 11070.29 |================================================================= 3 . 11118.96 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 774.42 |================================================================== 2 . 779.75 |=================================================================== 3 . 780.60 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 21579.62 |================================================================= 2 . 21621.52 |================================================================= 3 . 21676.33 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10209.22 |================================================================ 2 . 10272.06 |================================================================= 3 . 10288.49 |================================================================= Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 587.11 |=================================================================== 2 . 589.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 588.96 |=================================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet Microseconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 347977 |=================================================================== 2 . 347577 |=================================================================== 3 . 347804 |=================================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 5140843 |================================================================== 2 . 5107473 |================================================================== 3 . 5124043 |================================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile Microseconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 296004 |================================================================== 2 . 294322 |================================================================== 3 . 298494 |=================================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float Microseconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 233956 |=================================================================== 2 . 233898 |=================================================================== 3 . 234901 |=================================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant Microseconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 233087 |=================================================================== 2 . 232730 |=================================================================== 3 . 233384 |=================================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4616837 |================================================================== 2 . 4607500 |================================================================== 3 . 4607170 |================================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: TBB ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 71646 |==================================================================== 2 . 71108 |=================================================================== 3 . 71824 |==================================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 72458 |==================================================================== 2 . 71700 |=================================================================== 3 . 72247 |==================================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: C++ Tasks ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 72124 |==================================================================== 2 . 71793 |==================================================================== 3 . 72225 |==================================================================== toyBrot Fractal Generator 2020-11-18 Implementation: C++ Threads ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 72348 |==================================================================== 2 . 71971 |==================================================================== 3 . 72269 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.393 |==================================================================== 2 . 8.288 |=================================================================== 3 . 8.328 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 44.76 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.69 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.47 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.267 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.263 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.253 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.903 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.873 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.874 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 52.38 |==================================================================== 2 . 51.41 |=================================================================== 3 . 51.64 |=================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.49 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 25.56 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.21 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.19 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.15 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.56 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.51 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.57 |===================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.36 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.29 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.37 |===================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.61 |================================================================== 2 . 5.86 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.78 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.40 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.96 |================================================================== 3 . 8.87 |================================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.58 |===================================================================== 2 . 2.41 |================================================================ 3 . 2.43 |================================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 19.22 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.20 |================================================================ 3 . 18.34 |================================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 66.40 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.30 |==================================================================== 3 . 66.57 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.89 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.76 |==================================================================== 3 . 17.88 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 15.03 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.95 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.99 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 35.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 35.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 36.16 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 33.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 33.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 34.37 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.63 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.42 |=================================================================== 3 . 26.60 |==================================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.36 |==================================================================== 2 . 17.50 |================================================================= 3 . 17.59 |================================================================= TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 367.08 |=================================================================== 2 . 366.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 365.72 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 359.55 |=================================================================== 2 . 359.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 359.35 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 255.81 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.68 |================================================================== 3 . 250.45 |================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1313.98 |================================================================== 2 . 1310.40 |================================================================== 3 . 1310.37 |================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3980 |===================================================================== 2 . 3900 |==================================================================== 3 . 3940 |==================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 138.56 |=================================================================== 2 . 138.45 |=================================================================== 3 . 138.37 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 115.05 |=================================================================== 2 . 114.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 114.54 |=================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.39282 |================================================================== 2 . 0.38956 |================================================================= 3 . 0.38605 |=================================================================