9900KS Feb 2021 Intel Core i9-9900KS testing with a ASUS PRIME Z390-A (1502 BIOS) and ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900KS @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (1502 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201005-generic (x86_64) 20201004, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900KS @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (1502 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201005-generic (x86_64) 20201004, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900KS @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS PRIME Z390-A (1502 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201005-generic (x86_64) 20201004, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.68 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.73 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.67 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 669.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 674.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 669.26 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.64 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.64 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.60 |===================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 665.61 |=================================================================== 2 . 665.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 661.93 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 24.12 |=================================================================== 2 . 24.43 |==================================================================== 3 . 24.10 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 385.85 |================================================================== 2 . 390.87 |=================================================================== 3 . 385.48 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.72 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.73 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.72 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 379.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 379.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 379.47 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 40.97 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 40.88 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 427.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 428.04 |=================================================================== 3 . 426.02 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 38.66 |==================================================================== 2 . 38.66 |==================================================================== 3 . 38.64 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 402.85 |=================================================================== 2 . 402.92 |=================================================================== 3 . 402.65 |=================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2870.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 2869.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 2875.3 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1475.41 |================================================================== 2 . 1473.75 |================================================================== 3 . 1473.97 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 373.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 373.17 |=================================================================== 3 . 374.00 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 212.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 211.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 212.63 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 356.05 |=================================================================== 2 . 356.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 355.87 |=================================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 134.16 |=================================================================== 2 . 134.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 134.13 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 49 |======================================================================= 2 . 49 |======================================================================= 3 . 49 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 132 |====================================================================== 2 . 132 |====================================================================== 3 . 132 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 583 |====================================================================== 2 . 586 |====================================================================== 3 . 580 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2042 |===================================================================== 2 . 2039 |===================================================================== 3 . 2009 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105 |====================================================================== 2 . 105 |====================================================================== 3 . 102 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2227 |===================================================================== 2 . 2214 |===================================================================== 3 . 2204 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 126 |===================================================================== 2 . 128 |====================================================================== 3 . 127 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 560 |====================================================================== 2 . 560 |====================================================================== 3 . 560 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 518 |====================================================================== 2 . 518 |====================================================================== 3 . 509 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 719 |====================================================================== 2 . 721 |====================================================================== 3 . 721 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 222 |====================================================================== 2 . 221 |====================================================================== 3 . 220 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 832 |====================================================================== 2 . 831 |====================================================================== 3 . 830 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 251 |====================================================================== 2 . 251 |====================================================================== 3 . 248 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1387 |===================================================================== 2 . 1388 |===================================================================== 3 . 1388 |===================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 85.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 86.61 |==================================================================== 3 . 85.95 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 57.81 |==================================================================== 2 . 57.74 |==================================================================== 3 . 57.86 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.95 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.80 |==================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1345.38 |=============================================================== 2 . 1390.85 |================================================================== 3 . 1400.53 |================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.866 |================================================================ 2 . 7.011 |================================================================== 3 . 7.273 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 68.33 |==================================================================== 2 . 68.43 |==================================================================== 3 . 68.66 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.63 |==================================================================== 3 . 10.64 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: PNG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.89 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.89 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.89 |===================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 65.61 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.03 |==================================================================== 3 . 65.85 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 65.34 |=================================================================== 2 . 65.27 |=================================================================== 3 . 65.99 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Input: JPEG - Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 29.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 29.47 |==================================================================== 3 . 29.09 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.497 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.501 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.501 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.419 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.419 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.417 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.866 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.866 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.872 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.047 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.076 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.039 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 141.47 |=================================================================== 2 . 141.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 141.95 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 180.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 181.45 |=================================================================== 3 . 180.27 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 106.53 |================================================================== 2 . 107.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 107.11 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 88.44 |=================================================================== 2 . 88.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 89.62 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.420 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.422 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.408 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 249.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.47 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 461.55 |=================================================================== 2 . 462.90 |=================================================================== 3 . 462.36 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.75 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.72 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.73 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 884.36 |=================================================================== 2 . 884.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 884.36 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 772.37 |=================================================================== 2 . 772.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 773.02 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 41969.52 |================================================================= 2 . 41077.48 |================================================================ 3 . 40952.68 |=============================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 74284.14 |================================================================= 2 . 73621.26 |================================================================ 3 . 73679.20 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1406.28 |================================================================== 2 . 1406.13 |================================================================== 3 . 1406.44 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2239.80 |================================================================== 2 . 2240.98 |================================================================== 3 . 2239.41 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2342.94 |================================================================== 2 . 2349.85 |================================================================== 3 . 2342.82 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2342.82 |================================================================= 2 . 2374.67 |================================================================== 3 . 2374.67 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1759.47 |================================================================= 2 . 1791.03 |================================================================== 3 . 1751.84 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2863.19 |================================================================== 2 . 2862.97 |================================================================== 3 . 2862.97 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 229.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 229.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 229.18 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2021 Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.949 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.950 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.953 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3407927.75 |=============================================================== 2 . 2125943.75 |======================================= 3 . 2134841.33 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2770214.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 2754937.20 |=============================================================== 3 . 2765105.75 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2108426.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 2091360.42 |============================================================== 3 . 2079117.96 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3299628.20 |=============================================================== 2 . 2998589.50 |========================================================= 3 . 3026548.75 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2460477.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 2447823.17 |=============================================================== 3 . 2454436.75 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.616 |=================================================================== 2 . 4.590 |=================================================================== 3 . 4.657 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.10 |==================================================================== 2 . 25.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 25.24 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.658 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.658 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.660 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.326 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.323 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.323 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 29.04 |=================================================================== 3 . 29.41 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 443 |====================================================================== 2 . 444 |====================================================================== 3 . 444 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 675 |====================================================================== 2 . 675 |====================================================================== 3 . 673 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 78 |====================================================================== 2 . 79 |======================================================================= 3 . 79 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 17020 |================================================================= 2 . 17093 |================================================================== 3 . 17702 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 5467 |===================================================================== 2 . 5438 |===================================================================== 3 . 5443 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 60.93 |==================================================================== 2 . 60.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 60.20 |=================================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1 . 9535 |===================================================================== 2 . 9495 |==================================================================== 3 . 9569 |=====================================================================