9900K Feb Intel Core i9-9900K testing with a ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock Z390M Pro4 (P4.20 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 240GB Corsair Force MP510, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.4, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.81 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.84 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.83 |===================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 800 x 600 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 683.16 |=================================================================== 2 . 685.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 684.24 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.79 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.76 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.79 |===================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1024 x 768 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 680.24 |=================================================================== 2 . 677.56 |=================================================================== 3 . 680.56 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.75 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 6.72 |===================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 676.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 668.34 |================================================================== 3 . 673.17 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.65 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.67 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.66 |===================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 666.92 |=================================================================== 2 . 668.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 668.26 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 40.10 |==================================================================== 2 . 40.23 |==================================================================== 3 . 40.08 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 641.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 643.67 |=================================================================== 3 . 641.33 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 53.91 |==================================================================== 2 . 54.05 |==================================================================== 3 . 54.08 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 561.80 |=================================================================== 2 . 563.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 563.63 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 31.51 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 31.59 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 504.15 |=================================================================== 2 . 506.22 |=================================================================== 3 . 505.50 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 48.15 |==================================================================== 2 . 48.49 |==================================================================== 3 . 48.47 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 501.74 |=================================================================== 2 . 505.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 505.16 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 24.03 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.06 |==================================================================== 3 . 24.05 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 384.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 384.93 |=================================================================== 3 . 384.81 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 23.75 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.74 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.70 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 379.97 |=================================================================== 2 . 379.87 |=================================================================== 3 . 379.23 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 40.31 |==================================================================== 2 . 40.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 40.28 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 420.06 |=================================================================== 2 . 418.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 419.76 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 38.00 |==================================================================== 2 . 38.10 |==================================================================== 3 . 38.01 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 395.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 397.04 |=================================================================== 3 . 396.16 |=================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2875.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 2873.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 2870.5 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1488.34 |================================================================== 2 . 1475.14 |================================================================= 3 . 1475.32 |================================================================= Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 374.29 |=================================================================== 2 . 374.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 372.28 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 212.79 |=================================================================== 2 . 212.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 212.80 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 356.69 |=================================================================== 2 . 356.08 |=================================================================== 3 . 355.46 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5821.70 |================================================================== 2 . 5827.88 |================================================================== 3 . 5821.86 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1365.73 |================================================================== 2 . 1364.37 |================================================================== 3 . 1369.22 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1238.91 |================================================================== 2 . 1241.17 |================================================================== 3 . 1244.04 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13197.12 |================================================================= 2 . 13196.72 |================================================================= 3 . 13192.42 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 26870.62 |================================================================= 2 . 26847.14 |================================================================= 3 . 26494.79 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11191.22 |================================================================= 2 . 11157.26 |================================================================= 3 . 11019.71 |================================================================ CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 173.29 |================================================================= 2 . 177.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 177.80 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 93.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 94.63 |==================================================================== 3 . 94.50 |==================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 64.11 |=================================================================== 2 . 64.79 |==================================================================== 3 . 64.82 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.85 |=================================================================== 2 . 27.09 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.89 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 151.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 151.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 151.51 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 179.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 180.37 |=================================================================== 3 . 179.88 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 110.67 |=================================================================== 2 . 109.06 |================================================================== 3 . 106.34 |================================================================ Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 91.76 |==================================================================== 2 . 87.84 |================================================================= 3 . 87.84 |================================================================= WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.217 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.199 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.214 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 270.41 |=================================================================== 2 . 270.06 |=================================================================== 3 . 269.98 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 502.35 |=================================================================== 2 . 502.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 502.68 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.50 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.47 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.46 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 958.32 |=================================================================== 2 . 958.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 958.54 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 778.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 779.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 779.79 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 209.73 |=================================================================== 2 . 210.92 |=================================================================== 3 . 210.19 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 244.41 |=================================================================== 2 . 245.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 243.72 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9763.53 |================================================================== 2 . 9728.77 |================================================================== 3 . 9636.76 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1923.98 |=========================================================== 2 . 2138.96 |================================================================== 3 . 1969.07 |============================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 128406 |============================================================== 2 . 138029 |=================================================================== 3 . 109591 |===================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2407.40 |================================================================== 2 . 2414.39 |================================================================== 3 . 2409.58 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 42843 |=================================================================== 2 . 43263 |==================================================================== 3 . 42967 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14024 |==================================================================== 2 . 13817 |=================================================================== 3 . 14050 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 29857 |==================================================================== 2 . 29927 |==================================================================== 3 . 29800 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 58081 |=================================================================== 2 . 59250 |==================================================================== 3 . 58937 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 82103 |=================================================================== 2 . 83485 |==================================================================== 3 . 82300 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 42864.72 |================================================================= 2 . 42310.00 |================================================================ 3 . 42322.57 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 77099.03 |================================================================= 2 . 77249.79 |================================================================= 3 . 77249.23 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1133.30 |================================================================== 2 . 1134.01 |================================================================== 3 . 1133.10 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1943.18 |================================================================== 2 . 1939.36 |================================================================== 3 . 1943.47 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2280.02 |================================================================= 2 . 2275.14 |================================================================= 3 . 2315.42 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2090.93 |================================================================= 2 . 2077.22 |================================================================= 3 . 2116.46 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1290.85 |================================================================== 2 . 1257.93 |================================================================ 3 . 1263.90 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2250.09 |================================================================== 2 . 2256.41 |================================================================== 3 . 2262.84 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 198.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 199.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 199.21 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2021 Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.864 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.859 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.863 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3519007.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 2185311.70 |======================================= 3 . 2164427.75 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2822118.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 2816202.33 |=============================================================== 3 . 2764755.00 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2128609.25 |============================================================== 2 . 2149422.33 |=============================================================== 3 . 2111724.58 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3320352.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 3124531.67 |=========================================================== 3 . 3094622.92 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2488968.08 |============================================================== 2 . 2517931.83 |=============================================================== 3 . 2471021.00 |============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 401 |====================================================================== 2 . 402 |====================================================================== 3 . 400 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 618 |====================================================================== 2 . 621 |====================================================================== 3 . 621 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 69 |======================================================================= 2 . 69 |======================================================================= 3 . 69 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 17284 |==================================================================== 2 . 17313 |==================================================================== 3 . 17183 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 4921 |==================================================================== 2 . 4948 |===================================================================== 3 . 4964 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 60.70 |==================================================================== 2 . 60.36 |==================================================================== 3 . 60.59 |==================================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1 . 9169 |==================================================================== 2 . 9253 |===================================================================== 3 . 9190 |===================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Encode Speed: 5 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 67.01 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.90 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Encode Speed: 7 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 66.86 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.58 |==================================================================== JPEG XL 0.3.1 Encode Speed: 8 MP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 29.54 |==================================================================== 2 . 29.50 |====================================================================