9400F feb Intel Core i5-9400F testing with a MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS) and MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i5-9400F @ 4.10GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI B360M GAMING PLUS (MS-7B19) v1.0 (1.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Cannon Lake PCH, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB SAMSUNG MZVPW256HEGL-000H7, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV106 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200928-generic (x86_64) 20200927, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.7, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2337.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2308.1 |================================================================== 3 . 2323.6 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1196.41 |================================================================= 2 . 1202.93 |================================================================== 3 . 1205.75 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 305.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 304.40 |=================================================================== 3 . 303.98 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 173.87 |=================================================================== 2 . 173.85 |=================================================================== 3 . 173.77 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 290.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 290.35 |=================================================================== 3 . 290.30 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 840.43 |================================================================== 2 . 851.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 850.50 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 853.00 |=================================================================== 2 . 856.23 |=================================================================== 3 . 841.31 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19958.07 |================================================================ 2 . 20180.65 |================================================================= 3 . 20162.24 |================================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 188.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 186.33 |================================================================== 3 . 186.58 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 40 |======================================================================= 2 . 40 |======================================================================= 3 . 40 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 108 |====================================================================== 2 . 107 |===================================================================== 3 . 108 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 481 |====================================================================== 2 . 482 |====================================================================== 3 . 482 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1663 |===================================================================== 2 . 1663 |===================================================================== 3 . 1667 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 86 |======================================================================= 2 . 85 |====================================================================== 3 . 86 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1825 |===================================================================== 2 . 1822 |===================================================================== 3 . 1824 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 97 |====================================================================== 2 . 98 |======================================================================= 3 . 97 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 453 |====================================================================== 2 . 454 |====================================================================== 3 . 454 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 427 |====================================================================== 2 . 429 |====================================================================== 3 . 429 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 585 |====================================================================== 2 . 582 |====================================================================== 3 . 584 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 180 |====================================================================== 2 . 181 |====================================================================== 3 . 181 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 675 |====================================================================== 2 . 673 |====================================================================== 3 . 676 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 204 |====================================================================== 2 . 204 |====================================================================== 3 . 205 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1130 |===================================================================== 2 . 1130 |===================================================================== 3 . 1132 |===================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 122.81 |=================================================================== 2 . 122.43 |=================================================================== 3 . 122.69 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 81.42 |==================================================================== 2 . 80.83 |==================================================================== 3 . 80.95 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.08 |==================================================================== 2 . 29.09 |==================================================================== 3 . 28.93 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 250.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.11 |=================================================================== 3 . 250.06 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 222.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 221.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 222.77 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 143.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 142.58 |================================================================== 3 . 140.96 |================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 136.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 135.28 |================================================================== 3 . 132.37 |================================================================= WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.068 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.059 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.033 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 405.76 |=================================================================== 2 . 400.56 |================================================================== 3 . 400.68 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 740.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 739.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 739.73 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.90 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.91 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1508.40 |================================================================== 2 . 1508.76 |================================================================== 3 . 1512.26 |================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 643.19 |=================================================================== 2 . 643.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 642.10 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 65604.30 |================================================================ 2 . 64531.03 |=============================================================== 3 . 66301.50 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 117881.22 |================================================================ 2 . 116814.27 |=============================================================== 3 . 114471.90 |============================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 947.53 |=================================================================== 2 . 948.28 |=================================================================== 3 . 948.84 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1490.24 |================================================================== 2 . 1486.08 |================================================================== 3 . 1487.00 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1369.83 |================================================================== 2 . 1357.52 |================================================================= 3 . 1363.50 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1200.01 |================================================================== 2 . 1188.18 |================================================================= 3 . 1195.25 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 928.82 |================================================================== 2 . 949.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 932.09 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1578.61 |================================================================= 2 . 1613.67 |================================================================== 3 . 1578.61 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 153.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 153.06 |=================================================================== 3 . 152.91 |=================================================================== GROMACS 2021 Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.654 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.649 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.650 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2608999.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 1668913.46 |======================================== 3 . 1678059.96 |========================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2141641.30 |=============================================================== 2 . 2109915.71 |============================================================== 3 . 2092596.08 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1627330.67 |============================================================== 2 . 1642886.59 |=============================================================== 3 . 1618866.62 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2520705.83 |=============================================================== 2 . 2364549.08 |=========================================================== 3 . 2373918.25 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1937468.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 1911679.79 |============================================================== 3 . 1911561.29 |============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 283 |==================================================================== 2 . 290 |====================================================================== 3 . 290 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 497 |====================================================================== 2 . 494 |====================================================================== 3 . 494 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 52 |======================================================================= 2 . 52 |======================================================================= 3 . 52 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 17290 |==================================================================== 2 . 17331 |==================================================================== 3 . 17307 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 3768 |===================================================================== 2 . 3751 |===================================================================== 3 . 3767 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 74.74 |==================================================================== 2 . 74.68 |==================================================================== 3 . 74.66 |==================================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1 . 4935 |===================================================================== 2 . 4947 |===================================================================== 3 . 4899 |====================================================================