skylake-2021 Intel Core i5-6500 testing with a Gigabyte Z170M-D3H-CF (F22f BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel HD 530 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170M-D3H-CF (F22f BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 530 3GB (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200929-generic (x86_64) 20200928, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 1a: Processor: Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170M-D3H-CF (F22f BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 530 3GB (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200929-generic (x86_64) 20200928, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i5-6500 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z170M-D3H-CF (F22f BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 250GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel HD 530 3GB (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200929-generic (x86_64) 20200928, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 .. 19.93 |=================================================================== 1a . 19.93 |=================================================================== 2 .. 19.94 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 .. 318.99 |================================================================== 1a . 318.90 |================================================================== 2 .. 318.98 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 .. 32.02 |=================================================================== 1a . 31.86 |=================================================================== 2 .. 31.92 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 .. 333.71 |================================================================== 1a . 332.01 |================================================================== 2 .. 332.67 |================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 .. 2036.7 |================================================================== 1a . 2034.4 |================================================================== 2 .. 2029.5 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 1068.69 |================================================================= 1a . 1071.88 |================================================================= 2 .. 1071.64 |================================================================= Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 268.57 |================================================================== 1a . 268.70 |================================================================== 2 .. 268.85 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 153.48 |================================================================== 1a . 153.47 |================================================================== 2 .. 153.53 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 249.71 |================================================================ 1a . 256.77 |================================================================== 2 .. 256.69 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 13352.85 |================================================================ 1a . 13366.19 |================================================================ 2 .. 13369.34 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 3522.71 |================================================================= 1a . 3519.77 |================================================================= 2 .. 3519.03 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 485.56 |================================================================== 1a . 479.49 |================================================================= 2 .. 475.94 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 482.76 |================================================================== 1a . 484.86 |================================================================== 2 .. 477.86 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 6786.88 |================================================================= 1a . 6783.41 |================================================================= 2 .. 6782.85 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 14155.85 |================================================================ 1a . 14170.91 |================================================================ 2 .. 13865.99 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 7618.13 |================================================================= 1a . 7637.18 |================================================================= 2 .. 7631.60 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 4580.11 |================================================================= 1a . 4590.59 |================================================================= 2 .. 4563.01 |================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 35 |====================================================================== 1a . 35 |====================================================================== 2 .. 35 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 95 |====================================================================== 1a . 95 |====================================================================== 2 .. 95 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 424 |===================================================================== 1a . 425 |===================================================================== 2 .. 423 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 1473 |==================================================================== 1a . 1473 |==================================================================== 2 .. 1475 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 76 |====================================================================== 1a . 76 |====================================================================== 2 .. 74 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 1619 |==================================================================== 1a . 1620 |==================================================================== 2 .. 1616 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 80 |===================================================================== 1a . 81 |====================================================================== 2 .. 81 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 418 |===================================================================== 1a . 418 |===================================================================== 2 .. 418 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 379 |===================================================================== 1a . 379 |===================================================================== 2 .. 379 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 513 |===================================================================== 1a . 513 |===================================================================== 2 .. 514 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 159 |===================================================================== 1a . 159 |===================================================================== 2 .. 158 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 590 |===================================================================== 1a . 591 |===================================================================== 2 .. 591 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 187 |===================================================================== 1a . 186 |===================================================================== 2 .. 186 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 927 |===================================================================== 1a . 927 |===================================================================== 2 .. 927 |===================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 172.26 |================================================================== 1a . 172.23 |================================================================== 2 .. 172.61 |================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 101.90 |================================================================== 1a . 101.83 |================================================================== 2 .. 102.22 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 34.05 |=================================================================== 1a . 34.06 |=================================================================== 2 .. 33.70 |================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 252.15 |================================================================== 1a . 253.49 |================================================================== 2 .. 251.30 |================================================================= Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 164.98 |================================================================== 1a . 165.88 |================================================================== 2 .. 165.57 |================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 190.84 |================================================================== 1a . 190.78 |================================================================== 2 .. 191.98 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 11.85 |=================================================================== 1a . 11.83 |=================================================================== 2 .. 11.88 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 702.31 |================================================================== 1a . 701.49 |================================================================== 2 .. 701.73 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 34.85 |=================================================================== 2 .. 34.83 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 557.65 |================================================================== 2 .. 557.25 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 44.62 |=================================================================== 2 .. 44.77 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 465.03 |================================================================== 2 .. 466.52 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 27.06 |=================================================================== 2 .. 27.06 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 432.90 |================================================================== 2 .. 432.92 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 39.75 |=================================================================== 2 .. 39.92 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 414.21 |================================================================== 2 .. 416.00 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 20.32 |=================================================================== 2 .. 20.31 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 325.08 |================================================================== 2 .. 324.99 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 33.54 |=================================================================== 2 .. 33.61 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 349.49 |================================================================== 2 .. 350.25 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 1296.64 |================================================================= 2 .. 1293.97 |================================================================= WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 42.22 |=================================================================== 2 .. 42.22 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 2697.46 |================================================================= 2 .. 2697.17 |================================================================= Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1a . 565.07 |================================================================== 2 .. 566.03 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 929.61 |================================================================== 2 .. 929.61 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 1205.69 |================================================================= 2 .. 1202.97 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 1004.08 |================================================================= 2 .. 1004.11 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1a . 1025.02 |================================================================= 2 .. 1019.72 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 847.23 |================================================================== 2 .. 849.97 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 1248.69 |================================================================= 2 .. 1251.99 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 117.23 |================================================================== 2 .. 117.28 |================================================================== GROMACS 2021 Input: water_GMX50_bare Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1a . 0.472 |=================================================================== 2 .. 0.471 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 2286389.92 |============================================================== 2 .. 1401609.25 |====================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 1794891.92 |============================================================== 2 .. 1775478.21 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 1378777.92 |============================================================= 2 .. 1391524.04 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 2148140.50 |============================================================== 2 .. 2026326.87 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1a . 1610205.25 |============================================================== 2 .. 1619764.46 |============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1a . 209 |===================================================================== 2 .. 209 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1a . 332 |===================================================================== 2 .. 333 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1a . 35 |====================================================================== 2 .. 35 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1a . 13985 |=================================================================== 2 .. 13954 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1a . 2366 |==================================================================== 2 .. 2345 |=================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1a . 85.01 |=================================================================== 2 .. 84.65 |=================================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1a . 2810 |==================================================================== 2 .. 2825 |====================================================================