Ryzen 7 1800X 2021 AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core testing with a MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.F0 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X 2GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.F0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X 2GB (1212/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Baffin HDMI/DP, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.F0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X 2GB (1212/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Baffin HDMI/DP, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.F0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X 2GB (1212/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Baffin HDMI/DP, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1800X Eight-Core @ 3.60GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) v1.0 (1.F0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 256GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 460/560D / Pro 450/455/460/555/555X/560/560X 2GB (1212/1750MHz), Audio: AMD Baffin HDMI/DP, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Intel I211 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 107.40 |=================================================================== 2 . 106.25 |================================================================== 3 . 106.77 |================================================================== 4 . 107.68 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1718.37 |================================================================== 2 . 1700.02 |================================================================= 3 . 1708.30 |================================================================= 4 . 1722.84 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 37.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 37.95 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.97 |==================================================================== 4 . 37.96 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 607.71 |=================================================================== 2 . 607.27 |=================================================================== 3 . 607.50 |=================================================================== 4 . 607.38 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 99.41 |==================================================================== 2 . 99.48 |==================================================================== 3 . 99.58 |==================================================================== 4 . 99.35 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1035.93 |================================================================== 2 . 1036.65 |================================================================== 3 . 1037.82 |================================================================== 4 . 1035.32 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 50.56 |==================================================================== 2 . 50.52 |==================================================================== 3 . 50.59 |==================================================================== 4 . 50.51 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 526.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 526.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 527.23 |=================================================================== 4 . 526.37 |=================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2178.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 2188.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 2185.5 |=================================================================== 4 . 2179.1 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1516.53 |================================================================== 2 . 1511.25 |================================================================== 3 . 1509.92 |================================================================= 4 . 1522.77 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 234.17 |=================================================================== 2 . 233.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 234.05 |=================================================================== 4 . 234.24 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 145.63 |================================================================== 2 . 145.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 146.77 |=================================================================== 4 . 145.55 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 217.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 216.27 |================================================================== 3 . 218.15 |=================================================================== 4 . 218.70 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6432.80 |================================================================== 2 . 6381.07 |================================================================= 3 . 6365.99 |================================================================= 4 . 6370.26 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 473.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 470.87 |================================================================== 3 . 474.06 |=================================================================== 4 . 474.74 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 473.04 |================================================================== 2 . 477.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 472.27 |================================================================== 4 . 473.01 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12539.68 |================================================================= 2 . 12532.15 |================================================================= 3 . 12524.98 |================================================================= 4 . 12497.06 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23908.10 |================================================================= 2 . 23864.31 |================================================================= 3 . 23818.47 |================================================================= 4 . 23755.41 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11967.26 |================================================================= 2 . 11991.06 |================================================================= 3 . 11979.01 |================================================================= 4 . 11985.17 |================================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 180.75 |================================================================== 2 . 180.67 |================================================================== 3 . 183.50 |=================================================================== 4 . 180.13 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 36 |======================================================================= 2 . 36 |======================================================================= 3 . 35 |===================================================================== 4 . 35 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 106 |===================================================================== 2 . 107 |====================================================================== 3 . 106 |===================================================================== 4 . 107 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 489 |====================================================================== 2 . 492 |====================================================================== 3 . 490 |====================================================================== 4 . 490 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1542 |===================================================================== 2 . 1544 |===================================================================== 3 . 1543 |===================================================================== 4 . 1542 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 88 |======================================================================= 2 . 88 |======================================================================= 3 . 87 |====================================================================== 4 . 87 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1708 |===================================================================== 2 . 1713 |===================================================================== 3 . 1709 |===================================================================== 4 . 1713 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 86 |================================================================== 2 . 91 |====================================================================== 3 . 89 |===================================================================== 4 . 92 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 469 |===================================================================== 2 . 474 |====================================================================== 3 . 470 |===================================================================== 4 . 472 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 455 |====================================================================== 2 . 452 |====================================================================== 3 . 450 |===================================================================== 4 . 454 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 561 |====================================================================== 2 . 556 |===================================================================== 3 . 560 |====================================================================== 4 . 557 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 185 |===================================================================== 2 . 186 |====================================================================== 3 . 186 |====================================================================== 4 . 187 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 649 |===================================================================== 2 . 647 |===================================================================== 3 . 646 |===================================================================== 4 . 654 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 196 |====================================================================== 2 . 189 |==================================================================== 3 . 185 |================================================================== 4 . 187 |=================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 258316567 |================================================================ 2 . 259302600 |================================================================ 3 . 258939133 |================================================================ 4 . 259056033 |================================================================ Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 94.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 93.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 94.06 |==================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 69.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 69.82 |==================================================================== 3 . 69.45 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.92 |================================================================== 2 . 30.05 |=================================================================== 3 . 30.67 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 268.05 |=================================================================== 2 . 267.82 |=================================================================== 3 . 268.19 |=================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1200.87 |================================================================== 2 . 1200.86 |================================================================== 3 . 1200.73 |================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.014 |================================================================== 2 . 5.186 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.193 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 402.56 |=================================================================== 2 . 402.27 |=================================================================== 3 . 402.74 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 121.24 |=================================================================== 2 . 121.13 |=================================================================== 3 . 121.22 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 364.60 |=================================================================== 2 . 365.28 |=================================================================== 3 . 365.16 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 90.77 |==================================================================== 2 . 90.72 |==================================================================== 3 . 91.09 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.347 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.347 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.349 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.022 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.021 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.020 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.350 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.349 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.347 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.042 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.035 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.039 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 194.71 |=================================================================== 2 . 194.19 |=================================================================== 3 . 194.32 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 227.42 |=================================================================== 2 . 227.13 |=================================================================== 3 . 226.89 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 178.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 176.67 |================================================================== 3 . 174.20 |================================================================= Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 173.16 |================================================================= 2 . 172.27 |================================================================ 3 . 179.43 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.876 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.894 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.904 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 265.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 265.16 |=================================================================== 3 . 264.34 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 480.65 |=================================================================== 2 . 475.52 |================================================================== 3 . 478.89 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 14.30 |==================================================================== 3 . 14.31 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 808.67 |=================================================================== 2 . 808.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 810.39 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 605.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 600.12 |================================================================== 3 . 603.02 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 970.34 |=================================================================== 2 . 969.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 970.34 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1590.19 |================================================================== 2 . 1590.38 |================================================================== 3 . 1592.57 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2026.46 |================================================================= 2 . 2050.55 |================================================================== 3 . 2024.35 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1729.13 |================================================================== 2 . 1734.72 |================================================================== 3 . 1727.66 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 882.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 888.62 |=================================================================== 3 . 884.66 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1786.95 |================================================================== 2 . 1786.95 |================================================================== 3 . 1786.95 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 178.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 178.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 178.79 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2221045.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 1269611.04 |==================================== 3 . 1280999.75 |==================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1707590.29 |=============================================================== 2 . 1698053.33 |============================================================== 3 . 1719430.79 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1202540.45 |============================================================== 2 . 1213171.58 |=============================================================== 3 . 1221884.04 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1990382.29 |=============================================================== 2 . 1888790.08 |============================================================ 3 . 1901106.00 |============================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1475057.50 |============================================================== 2 . 1494117.20 |=============================================================== 3 . 1471631.25 |============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.983 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.941 |==================================================================== 3 . 9.907 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 48.01 |==================================================================== 2 . 47.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 47.17 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.334 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.249 |=================================================================== 3 . 5.200 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.908 |==================================================================== 2 . 4.888 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.879 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 54.30 |=================================================================== 2 . 54.92 |==================================================================== 3 . 54.77 |==================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 285.61 |=================================================================== 2 . 282.25 |================================================================== 3 . 284.31 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 266.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 264.70 |================================================================== 3 . 266.06 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 199 |====================================================================== 2 . 199 |====================================================================== 3 . 199 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 301 |====================================================================== 2 . 302 |====================================================================== 3 . 302 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 35 |======================================================================= 2 . 35 |======================================================================= 3 . 35 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 9350 |==================================================================== 2 . 9440 |===================================================================== 3 . 9391 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 2483 |===================================================================== 2 . 2480 |===================================================================== 3 . 2488 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 75.40 |==================================================================== 2 . 74.99 |==================================================================== 3 . 74.77 |=================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 25764743 |================================================================= 2 . 25870857 |================================================================= 3 . 25843527 |================================================================= Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1 . 7959 |===================================================================== 2 . 7896 |==================================================================== 3 . 7982 |=====================================================================