Xeon E3 1280 v5 Feb Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 testing with a MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS) and ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200826-generic (x86_64) 20200825, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200826-generic (x86_64) 20200825, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200826-generic (x86_64) 20200825, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1280 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z170A SLI PLUS (MS-7998) v1.0 (2.A0 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TOSHIBA RD400, Graphics: ASUS AMD Radeon HD 7850 / R7 265 R9 270 1024SP, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc2daily20200826-generic (x86_64) 20200825, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 43.91 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.60 |================================================= 3 . 31.91 |================================================= 4 . 31.73 |================================================= ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 4402.29 |================================================================== 2 . 3167.39 |=============================================== 3 . 3199.20 |================================================ 4 . 3181.53 |================================================ ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 100.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 71.69 |================================================ 3 . 70.77 |=============================================== 4 . 71.54 |================================================ ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1607.67 |================================================================== 2 . 1147.02 |=============================================== 3 . 1132.24 |============================================== 4 . 1144.59 |=============================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 82.79 |==================================================================== 2 . 82.93 |==================================================================== 3 . 82.93 |==================================================================== 4 . 82.90 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 862.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 864.26 |=================================================================== 3 . 864.18 |=================================================================== 4 . 863.95 |=================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2277.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 2279.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 2254.0 |================================================================== 4 . 2277.8 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1146.89 |================================================================== 2 . 1147.66 |================================================================== 3 . 1151.18 |================================================================== 4 . 1151.06 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 294.90 |=================================================================== 2 . 294.15 |=================================================================== 3 . 294.90 |=================================================================== 4 . 293.49 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 167.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 168.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 168.00 |=================================================================== 4 . 167.77 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 281.18 |=================================================================== 2 . 281.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 281.13 |=================================================================== 4 . 279.59 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14085.02 |================================================================= 2 . 14093.72 |================================================================= 3 . 14055.30 |================================================================= 4 . 14060.83 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3279.96 |================================================================== 2 . 3268.09 |================================================================== 3 . 3251.12 |================================================================= 4 . 3258.39 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 534.87 |================================================================== 2 . 541.21 |=================================================================== 3 . 541.24 |=================================================================== 4 . 540.15 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 538.74 |=================================================================== 2 . 541.67 |=================================================================== 3 . 542.43 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7406.46 |================================================================== 2 . 7409.62 |================================================================== 3 . 7358.83 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 522.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 522.40 |=================================================================== 3 . 521.96 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15044.95 |================================================================= 2 . 15039.27 |================================================================= 3 . 15037.87 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7319.68 |================================================================== 2 . 7321.00 |================================================================== 3 . 7316.58 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4474.21 |================================================================== 2 . 4466.84 |================================================================== 3 . 4470.48 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 39 |======================================================================= 2 . 39 |======================================================================= 3 . 39 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105 |====================================================================== 2 . 105 |====================================================================== 3 . 104 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 463 |====================================================================== 2 . 460 |===================================================================== 3 . 464 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1600 |===================================================================== 2 . 1606 |===================================================================== 3 . 1600 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 86 |======================================================================= 2 . 84 |===================================================================== 3 . 83 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1762 |===================================================================== 2 . 1770 |===================================================================== 3 . 1751 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 90 |===================================================================== 2 . 92 |======================================================================= 3 . 90 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 463 |====================================================================== 2 . 463 |====================================================================== 3 . 463 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 414 |====================================================================== 2 . 412 |====================================================================== 3 . 412 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 566 |====================================================================== 2 . 564 |====================================================================== 3 . 563 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 176 |====================================================================== 2 . 175 |====================================================================== 3 . 175 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 653 |====================================================================== 2 . 654 |====================================================================== 3 . 651 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 206 |====================================================================== 2 . 204 |===================================================================== 3 . 205 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1020 |===================================================================== 2 . 1023 |===================================================================== 3 . 1020 |===================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 163.79 |=================================================================== 2 . 164.04 |=================================================================== 3 . 163.73 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 99.70 |==================================================================== 2 . 99.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 99.75 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 30.55 |==================================================================== 2 . 30.61 |==================================================================== 3 . 30.69 |==================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 228.00 |=================================================================== 2 . 227.92 |=================================================================== 3 . 228.02 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C2670 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 156.73 |================================================================== 2 . 156.68 |================================================================== 3 . 158.50 |=================================================================== Ngspice 34 Circuit: C7552 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 163.56 |=================================================================== 2 . 162.07 |================================================================== 3 . 162.60 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.539 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.580 |==================================================================== 3 . 9.561 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 565.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 567.33 |=================================================================== 3 . 566.12 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1042.44 |================================================================== 2 . 1045.00 |================================================================== 3 . 1044.92 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.28 |==================================================================== 2 . 32.33 |==================================================================== 3 . 32.38 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2061.21 |================================================================== 2 . 2062.85 |================================================================== 3 . 2061.11 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 76866.68 |================================================================= 2 . 77080.15 |================================================================= 3 . 77117.47 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 135570.81 |================================================================ 2 . 134942.14 |================================================================ 3 . 135109.28 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 948.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 948.23 |=================================================================== 3 . 947.81 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1200.93 |================================================================== 2 . 1200.70 |================================================================== 3 . 1200.03 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1033.09 |================================================================== 2 . 1033.05 |================================================================== 3 . 1035.78 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1174.93 |================================================================== 2 . 1171.41 |================================================================== 3 . 1178.57 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 956.61 |=================================================================== 2 . 952.05 |=================================================================== 3 . 953.22 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1315.94 |================================================================== 2 . 1315.94 |================================================================== 3 . 1313.77 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 134.77 |=================================================================== 2 . 134.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 134.11 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2398581.58 |=============================================================== 2 . 1508820.33 |======================================== 3 . 1497147.63 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1893846.79 |=============================================================== 2 . 1890949.04 |=============================================================== 3 . 1866817.63 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1442717.14 |============================================================== 2 . 1467441.79 |=============================================================== 3 . 1462812.54 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2246166.42 |=============================================================== 2 . 2106185.08 |=========================================================== 3 . 2100303.25 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1723299.04 |=============================================================== 2 . 1701062.25 |============================================================== 3 . 1704419.13 |============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 233 |====================================================================== 2 . 234 |====================================================================== 3 . 234 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 359 |====================================================================== 2 . 359 |====================================================================== 3 . 358 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 39 |======================================================================= 2 . 39 |======================================================================= 3 . 39 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 13436 |==================================================================== 2 . 13451 |==================================================================== 3 . 13426 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 2818 |===================================================================== 2 . 2825 |===================================================================== 3 . 2788 |==================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 77.07 |==================================================================== 2 . 76.34 |=================================================================== 3 . 76.24 |=================================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 5 Mode: CPU vsamples > Higher Is Better 1 . 4114 |==================================================================== 2 . 4082 |==================================================================== 3 . 4149 |=====================================================================