Core i7 4790K Haswell 2021 Intel Core i7-4790K testing with a Gigabyte Z97-HD3P (F4 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel Haswell Desktop 2GB on Ubuntu 19.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.40GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z97-HD3P (F4 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB OCZ TRION100, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel Haswell Desktop 2GB (1250MHz), Audio: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201009-generic (x86_64) 20201008, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.2.8, Vulkan: 1.1.102, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.40GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z97-HD3P (F4 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB OCZ TRION100, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel Haswell Desktop 2GB (1250MHz), Audio: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201009-generic (x86_64) 20201008, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.2.8, Vulkan: 1.1.102, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.40GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte Z97-HD3P (F4 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 4th Gen Core DRAM, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB OCZ TRION100, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel Haswell Desktop 2GB (1250MHz), Audio: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 19.10, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201009-generic (x86_64) 20201008, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.34.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.5, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.5, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 19.2.8, Vulkan: 1.1.102, Compiler: GCC 9.2.1 20191008, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2126.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 2096.7 |================================================================== 3 . 2102.3 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1358.49 |================================================================== 2 . 1350.78 |================================================================== 3 . 1354.16 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 300.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 300.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 300.87 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 176.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 174.22 |================================================================== 3 . 175.89 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 286.52 |=================================================================== 2 . 280.81 |================================================================== 3 . 285.13 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10914.81 |================================================================= 2 . 10620.67 |=============================================================== 3 . 10544.92 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1721.85 |================================================================== 2 . 1702.63 |================================================================= 3 . 1667.32 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 533.55 |=================================================================== 2 . 520.08 |================================================================= 3 . 528.80 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 555.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 530.97 |================================================================ 3 . 527.59 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6229.18 |================================================================== 2 . 5938.40 |=============================================================== 3 . 5958.32 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11803.12 |================================================================= 2 . 11557.65 |================================================================ 3 . 11568.60 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5762.45 |================================================================== 2 . 5689.19 |================================================================= 3 . 5679.00 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3468.58 |================================================================== 2 . 3436.06 |================================================================= 3 . 3466.04 |================================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 283.83 |================================================================= 2 . 291.34 |=================================================================== 3 . 290.61 |=================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1273.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 1318.88 |================================================================== 3 . 1328.43 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 42 |======================================================================= 2 . 42 |======================================================================= 3 . 42 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 122 |====================================================================== 2 . 122 |====================================================================== 3 . 122 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 514 |===================================================================== 2 . 519 |====================================================================== 3 . 517 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1761 |===================================================================== 2 . 1739 |==================================================================== 3 . 1757 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 94 |======================================================================= 2 . 93 |====================================================================== 3 . 93 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1859 |===================================================================== 2 . 1850 |===================================================================== 3 . 1859 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 98 |======================================================================= 2 . 98 |======================================================================= 3 . 97 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 542 |====================================================================== 2 . 542 |====================================================================== 3 . 543 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 469 |====================================================================== 2 . 470 |====================================================================== 3 . 467 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 644 |===================================================================== 2 . 649 |====================================================================== 3 . 648 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 195 |====================================================================== 2 . 195 |====================================================================== 3 . 194 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 759 |====================================================================== 2 . 754 |====================================================================== 3 . 743 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 238 |====================================================================== 2 . 237 |====================================================================== 3 . 237 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1247 |===================================================================== 2 . 1246 |===================================================================== 3 . 1247 |===================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 142650533 |=============================================================== 2 . 142648900 |=============================================================== 3 . 144880267 |================================================================ Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 218.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 219.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 220.02 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 153.20 |=================================================================== 2 . 152.27 |=================================================================== 3 . 150.41 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 43.71 |================================================================== 2 . 45.06 |==================================================================== 3 . 45.33 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 505.91 |=================================================================== 2 . 501.41 |================================================================== 3 . 509.71 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.113 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.086 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.063 |================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.288 |================================================================== 2 . 2.332 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.370 |==================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1141.34 |================================================================== 2 . 1137.15 |================================================================== 3 . 1129.53 |================================================================= dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 311.53 |================================================================== 2 . 312.54 |================================================================== 3 . 316.62 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 84.42 |==================================================================== 2 . 80.31 |================================================================= 3 . 81.39 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 294.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 290.32 |================================================================== 3 . 291.67 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 71.73 |==================================================================== 2 . 69.99 |================================================================== 3 . 70.18 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.285 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.284 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.282 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.860 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.841 |================================================================== 3 . 0.861 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.132 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.103 |================================================================== 3 . 1.125 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.648 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.606 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.624 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 268.52 |=============================================================== 2 . 286.10 |=================================================================== 3 . 286.70 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 216.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 216.09 |=================================================================== 3 . 216.04 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.787 |============================================================== 2 . 9.617 |==================================================================== 3 . 9.611 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 525.39 |============================================================= 2 . 576.63 |=================================================================== 3 . 577.84 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 946.91 |============================================================ 2 . 1043.53 |================================================================== 3 . 1041.22 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.84 |============================================================== 2 . 28.41 |==================================================================== 3 . 28.41 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1693.66 |============================================================= 2 . 1845.28 |================================================================== 3 . 1845.97 |================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 623.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 623.37 |=================================================================== 3 . 622.84 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 78359.78 |=========================================================== 2 . 85414.02 |================================================================= 3 . 85671.88 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 133972.68 |========================================================== 2 . 147273.91 |================================================================ 3 . 147113.62 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 777.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 781.03 |=================================================================== 3 . 780.65 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1116.24 |================================================================== 2 . 1110.24 |================================================================== 3 . 1109.84 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 782.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 744.07 |================================================================ 3 . 762.35 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 924.56 |================================================================== 2 . 925.69 |================================================================== 3 . 938.33 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 811.76 |================================================================= 2 . 817.63 |================================================================== 3 . 830.38 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1183.36 |================================================================ 2 . 1221.38 |================================================================== 3 . 1228.90 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 116.73 |=================================================================== 2 . 116.87 |=================================================================== 3 . 116.73 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1695810 |================================================================== 2 . 1695810 |================================================================== 3 . 1696724 |================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 667891 |=================================================================== 2 . 667317 |=================================================================== 3 . 666193 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2224.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2231.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 2231.0 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2219.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 2217.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 2224.9 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 703.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 705.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 705.8 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 681.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 681.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 682.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 437.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 439.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 437.9 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 439.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 439.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 438.9 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1811.6 |=================================================================== 2 . 1819.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 1818.3 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1799.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 1797.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 1803.3 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 705.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 704.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 704.8 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 680.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 681.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 681.8 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 439.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 439.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 437.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 439.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 438.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 439.4 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2702847.08 |=============================================================== 2 . 1689083.92 |======================================= 3 . 1690644.91 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2153011.49 |=============================================================== 2 . 2127161.64 |============================================================== 3 . 2132653.50 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1653789.79 |=============================================================== 2 . 1643329.83 |=============================================================== 3 . 1606390.58 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2553792.90 |=============================================================== 2 . 2305135.58 |========================================================= 3 . 2342296.04 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1922586.38 |============================================================== 2 . 1915963.96 |============================================================== 3 . 1950174.59 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.450 |============================================================ 2 . 7.147 |================================================================== 3 . 7.329 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 42.04 |================================================================ 2 . 44.56 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.17 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.074 |=============================================================== 2 . 4.347 |=================================================================== 3 . 4.432 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.551 |================================================================= 2 . 4.747 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.684 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 51.28 |============================================================== 2 . 56.07 |==================================================================== 3 . 55.21 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 264.91 |=================================================================== 2 . 264.19 |=================================================================== 3 . 264.87 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 250.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 250.41 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 214 |====================================================================== 2 . 204 |=================================================================== 3 . 205 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 379 |====================================================================== 2 . 357 |================================================================== 3 . 356 |================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 37 |======================================================================= 2 . 37 |======================================================================= 3 . 37 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 11806 |==================================================================== 2 . 11758 |==================================================================== 3 . 11748 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 2738 |===================================================================== 2 . 2744 |===================================================================== 3 . 2749 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 64.93 |==================================================================== 2 . 65.08 |==================================================================== 3 . 65.19 |==================================================================== Unpacking Firefox 84.0 Extracting: firefox-84.0.source.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.41 |================================================================== 2 . 18.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 18.51 |=================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 22098350 |================================================================= 2 . 22232560 |================================================================= 3 . 21901077 |================================================================