Ryzen 3 1300X AMD 2021 AMD Ryzen 3 1300X testing with a ASRock AB350 Pro4 (P3.20 BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon R7 260X/360 2GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock AB350 Pro4 (P3.20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB ADATA SU800, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R7 260X/360 2GB, Audio: AMD Tobago HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900daily20201021-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock AB350 Pro4 (P3.20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB ADATA SU800, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R7 260X/360 2GB, Audio: AMD Tobago HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900daily20201021-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock AB350 Pro4 (P3.20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB ADATA SU800, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R7 260X/360 2GB, Audio: AMD Tobago HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900daily20201021-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen 3 1300X @ 3.50GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock AB350 Pro4 (P3.20 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 128GB ADATA SU800, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon R7 260X/360 2GB, Audio: AMD Tobago HDMI Audio, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900daily20201021-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 248.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 250.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 250.6 |==================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2091.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2104.4 |=================================================================== 3 . 2092.6 |=================================================================== 4 . 2087.7 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1569.59 |================================================================== 2 . 1574.00 |================================================================== 3 . 1562.43 |================================================================= 4 . 1574.84 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 220.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 218.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 218.94 |=================================================================== 4 . 218.90 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 140.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 140.46 |=================================================================== 3 . 139.99 |=================================================================== 4 . 138.78 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 205.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 207.20 |=================================================================== 3 . 206.57 |=================================================================== 4 . 206.80 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15952.88 |================================================================= 2 . 16006.36 |================================================================= 3 . 15988.64 |================================================================= 4 . 15920.49 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5321.12 |================================================================== 2 . 5338.27 |================================================================== 3 . 5321.73 |================================================================== 4 . 5333.32 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 229.67 |================================================================= 2 . 229.58 |================================================================= 3 . 235.56 |=================================================================== 4 . 235.93 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 229.66 |=================================================================== 2 . 229.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 229.69 |=================================================================== 4 . 229.69 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8852.04 |================================================================== 2 . 8902.99 |================================================================== 3 . 8883.14 |================================================================== 4 . 8894.11 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17357.26 |================================================================ 2 . 17716.15 |================================================================= 3 . 17618.96 |================================================================= 4 . 17649.27 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8900.05 |================================================================== 2 . 8897.80 |================================================================== 3 . 8895.86 |================================================================== 4 . 8863.82 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5394.79 |================================================================== 2 . 5401.79 |================================================================== 3 . 5379.35 |================================================================== 4 . 5319.33 |================================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 160.69 |================================================================== 2 . 160.83 |================================================================== 3 . 161.79 |=================================================================== 4 . 162.54 |=================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1311.93 |============================================================= 2 . 1424.95 |================================================================== 3 . 1311.51 |============================================================= 4 . 1310.76 |============================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 32 |=================================================================== 2 . 33 |===================================================================== 3 . 33 |===================================================================== 4 . 34 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102 |===================================================================== 2 . 103 |====================================================================== 3 . 103 |====================================================================== 4 . 102 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 476 |====================================================================== 2 . 477 |====================================================================== 3 . 477 |====================================================================== 4 . 477 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1460 |===================================================================== 2 . 1463 |===================================================================== 3 . 1465 |===================================================================== 4 . 1462 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 68 |======================================================================= 2 . 68 |======================================================================= 3 . 68 |======================================================================= 4 . 68 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1625 |===================================================================== 2 . 1617 |===================================================================== 3 . 1621 |===================================================================== 4 . 1623 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 72 |===================================================================== 2 . 71 |==================================================================== 3 . 74 |======================================================================= 4 . 74 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 428 |====================================================================== 2 . 430 |====================================================================== 3 . 431 |====================================================================== 4 . 429 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 426 |====================================================================== 2 . 428 |====================================================================== 3 . 427 |====================================================================== 4 . 428 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 522 |====================================================================== 2 . 525 |====================================================================== 3 . 522 |====================================================================== 4 . 524 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 177 |====================================================================== 2 . 178 |====================================================================== 3 . 178 |====================================================================== 4 . 178 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 598 |====================================================================== 2 . 602 |====================================================================== 3 . 599 |====================================================================== 4 . 596 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 219 |====================================================================== 2 . 218 |====================================================================== 3 . 218 |====================================================================== 4 . 217 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1099 |===================================================================== 2 . 1099 |===================================================================== 3 . 1104 |===================================================================== 4 . 1098 |===================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 237754433 |================================================================ 2 . 238613267 |================================================================ 3 . 237792967 |================================================================ 4 . 237786400 |================================================================ Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 134.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 134.95 |=================================================================== 3 . 135.24 |=================================================================== 4 . 135.00 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 98.30 |==================================================================== 2 . 98.76 |==================================================================== 3 . 98.58 |==================================================================== 4 . 98.87 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 30.87 |=================================================================== 2 . 31.06 |=================================================================== 3 . 31.50 |==================================================================== 4 . 31.39 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 299.35 |=================================================================== 2 . 298.02 |================================================================== 3 . 299.99 |=================================================================== 4 . 300.29 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.761 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.759 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.769 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.744 |=================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1198.04 |================================================================== 2 . 1206.45 |================================================================== 3 . 1196.96 |================================================================= 4 . 1187.81 |================================================================= dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 184.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 184.67 |=================================================================== 3 . 184.95 |=================================================================== 4 . 183.88 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 55.61 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.60 |==================================================================== 3 . 55.60 |==================================================================== 4 . 55.24 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 180.25 |=================================================================== 2 . 179.34 |=================================================================== 3 . 179.97 |=================================================================== 4 . 178.53 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 56.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 56.26 |==================================================================== 3 . 56.19 |==================================================================== 4 . 56.14 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.315 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.316 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.316 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.316 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.915 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.916 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.916 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.913 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.204 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.204 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.203 |==================================================================== 4 . 1.204 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.703 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.696 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.698 |==================================================================== 4 . 2.694 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 453.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 455.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 454.38 |=================================================================== 4 . 452.75 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 238.32 |================================================================= 2 . 241.39 |================================================================== 3 . 241.70 |================================================================== 4 . 244.89 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.17 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.14 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.17 |==================================================================== 4 . 11.14 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 675.52 |=================================================================== 2 . 671.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 673.79 |=================================================================== 4 . 672.23 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1219.29 |================================================================== 2 . 1218.66 |================================================================== 3 . 1216.78 |================================================================== 4 . 1216.67 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.53 |=================================================================== 2 . 37.81 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.45 |=================================================================== 4 . 37.45 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 584.40 |=================================================================== 2 . 585.19 |=================================================================== 3 . 582.62 |=================================================================== 4 . 584.48 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 951.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 943.89 |================================================================== 3 . 948.09 |=================================================================== 4 . 948.66 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1220.43 |================================================================== 2 . 1219.96 |================================================================== 3 . 1220.90 |================================================================== 4 . 1215.33 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1282.25 |================================================================== 2 . 1282.09 |================================================================== 3 . 1290.50 |================================================================== 4 . 1286.25 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1211.22 |================================================================== 2 . 1211.15 |================================================================== 3 . 1214.86 |================================================================== 4 . 1214.86 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 811.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 806.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 809.44 |=================================================================== 4 . 802.81 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1223.53 |================================================================== 2 . 1217.81 |================================================================== 3 . 1213.97 |================================================================= 4 . 1215.80 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 169.68 |================================================================== 2 . 167.97 |================================================================== 3 . 168.92 |================================================================== 4 . 171.36 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1881763.71 |=============================================================== 2 . 1128607.66 |====================================== 3 . 1113772.13 |===================================== 4 . 1117057.37 |===================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1519189.52 |============================================================== 2 . 1492719.29 |============================================================= 3 . 1465201.50 |============================================================ 4 . 1541589.42 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1052589.08 |============================================================== 2 . 1063282.54 |=============================================================== 3 . 1051619.54 |============================================================== 4 . 1055576.65 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1757575.31 |=============================================================== 2 . 1632073.67 |=========================================================== 3 . 1667499.62 |============================================================ 4 . 1615898.37 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1295666.93 |============================================================== 2 . 1287289.13 |============================================================== 3 . 1313788.00 |=============================================================== 4 . 1292647.84 |============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.36 |=================================================================== 2 . 10.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 10.44 |==================================================================== 4 . 10.27 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 47.23 |==================================================================== 2 . 47.10 |==================================================================== 3 . 47.12 |==================================================================== 4 . 46.96 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.002 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.986 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.985 |==================================================================== 4 . 5.961 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.384 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.376 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.371 |==================================================================== 4 . 7.337 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 61.83 |================================================================== 2 . 61.18 |================================================================= 3 . 61.33 |================================================================= 4 . 63.99 |==================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 289.04 |=================================================================== 2 . 286.34 |================================================================== 3 . 286.22 |================================================================== 4 . 287.97 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 285.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 285.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 284.67 |=================================================================== 4 . 285.39 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 144 |====================================================================== 2 . 144 |====================================================================== 4 . 144 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 219 |====================================================================== 2 . 219 |====================================================================== 4 . 219 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 22 |======================================================================= 2 . 22 |======================================================================= 4 . 22 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 11330 |==================================================================== 2 . 11353 |==================================================================== 4 . 11337 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 1631 |===================================================================== 2 . 1640 |===================================================================== 4 . 1637 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 80.85 |==================================================================== 2 . 81.00 |==================================================================== 4 . 81.31 |==================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 43326308 |================================================================= 2 . 43479080 |================================================================= 4 . 43148170 |=================================================================