TR 2970WX New 2021 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core testing with a Gigabyte X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (F12h BIOS) and Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core @ 3.00GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (F12h BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + 2 x QLogic cLOM8214 1/10GbE + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core @ 3.00GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (F12h BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + 2 x QLogic cLOM8214 1/10GbE + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core @ 3.00GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (F12h BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + 2 x QLogic cLOM8214 1/10GbE + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX 24-Core @ 3.00GHz (24 Cores / 48 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X399 AORUS Gaming 7 (F12h BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: Sapphire AMD Radeon RX 550 640SP / 560/560X 4GB (1300/1750MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Qualcomm Atheros Killer E2500 + 2 x QLogic cLOM8214 1/10GbE + Intel 8265 / 8275 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 15.65 |==================================================================== 2 . 15.65 |==================================================================== 3 . 15.65 |==================================================================== 4 . 15.65 |==================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1568.81 |================================================================== 2 . 1568.97 |================================================================== 3 . 1568.70 |================================================================== 4 . 1568.83 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 133.15 |=================================================================== 2 . 132.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 132.87 |=================================================================== 4 . 132.96 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2130.42 |================================================================== 2 . 2119.04 |================================================================== 3 . 2125.87 |================================================================== 4 . 2127.45 |================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 117.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 117.85 |=================================================================== 3 . 117.91 |=================================================================== 4 . 117.86 |=================================================================== ParaView 5.9 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1227.46 |================================================================== 2 . 1228.11 |================================================================== 3 . 1228.80 |================================================================== 4 . 1228.24 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1675.47 |================================================================ 2 . 1730.76 |================================================================== 3 . 1702.61 |================================================================= 4 . 1738.46 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 240.46 |=================================================================== 2 . 236.88 |================================================================== 3 . 236.77 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 151.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 151.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 151.51 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 225.47 |=================================================================== 2 . 223.53 |================================================================== 3 . 223.44 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1362.44 |================================================================== 2 . 1361.29 |================================================================== 3 . 1346.34 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1342.01 |================================================================== 2 . 1335.21 |================================================================== 3 . 1329.41 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 38463.17 |=============================================================== 2 . 39462.12 |================================================================= 3 . 38566.53 |================================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37 |======================================================================= 2 . 35 |=================================================================== 3 . 36 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 112 |====================================================================== 2 . 109 |==================================================================== 3 . 108 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 530 |====================================================================== 2 . 532 |====================================================================== 3 . 532 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1556 |===================================================================== 2 . 1564 |===================================================================== 3 . 1563 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 94 |===================================================================== 2 . 96 |====================================================================== 3 . 97 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1747 |==================================================================== 2 . 1750 |==================================================================== 3 . 1780 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 91 |======================================================================= 2 . 90 |====================================================================== 3 . 89 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 453 |====================================================================== 2 . 455 |====================================================================== 3 . 454 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 485 |===================================================================== 2 . 490 |====================================================================== 3 . 489 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 557 |===================================================================== 2 . 563 |====================================================================== 3 . 564 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 196 |===================================================================== 2 . 197 |===================================================================== 3 . 200 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 652 |==================================================================== 2 . 657 |===================================================================== 3 . 671 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 238 |===================================================================== 2 . 240 |===================================================================== 3 . 242 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1163 |=================================================================== 2 . 1170 |=================================================================== 3 . 1197 |===================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 55.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 53.91 |================================================================= 3 . 53.41 |================================================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 43.46 |================================================================= 2 . 45.21 |==================================================================== 3 . 40.90 |============================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.11 |=============================================================== 2 . 39.87 |==================================================================== 3 . 39.44 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 221.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 221.26 |=================================================================== 3 . 218.82 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.146 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.128 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.116 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 144.80 |================================================================== 2 . 146.64 |=================================================================== 3 . 145.51 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 267.93 |================================================================== 2 . 272.01 |=================================================================== 3 . 269.98 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.512 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.532 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.474 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 582.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 584.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 580.99 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 905.22 |=================================================================== 2 . 911.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 910.53 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 624.09 |=================================================================== 2 . 617.44 |================================================================== 3 . 624.44 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13210 |=================================================================== 2 . 13337 |==================================================================== 3 . 13353 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3061.18 |================================================================== 2 . 3063.62 |================================================================== 3 . 3042.20 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 388923 |=================================================================== 2 . 388933 |=================================================================== 3 . 380417 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3542.80 |================================================================== 2 . 3536.47 |================================================================== 3 . 3543.51 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 95743 |================================================================== 2 . 98875 |==================================================================== 3 . 97722 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9387.68 |================================================================= 2 . 9481.70 |================================================================== 3 . 9493.20 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 32230 |=================================================================== 2 . 32828 |==================================================================== 3 . 32900 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 121896 |=================================================================== 2 . 121733 |=================================================================== 3 . 121660 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 162513 |=================================================================== 2 . 162033 |=================================================================== 3 . 161737 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 55137.90 |=========================================================== 2 . 59107.77 |=============================================================== 3 . 60899.58 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 106038.83 |======================================================== 2 . 121601.70 |================================================================ 3 . 117912.92 |============================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 946.68 |================================================================== 2 . 956.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 944.20 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1525.08 |================================================== 2 . 2017.43 |================================================================== 3 . 1667.59 |======================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 159.84 |================================================================= 2 . 164.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 163.70 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1968512.59 |=============================================================== 2 . 1218050.21 |======================================= 3 . 1251792.29 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1646933.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 1583032.46 |============================================================= 3 . 1633246.40 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1173888.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 1154272.04 |============================================================== 3 . 1168206.63 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1906599.63 |=============================================================== 2 . 1771191.63 |=========================================================== 3 . 1776002.79 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1425303.66 |=============================================================== 2 . 1380477.45 |============================================================= 3 . 1372523.54 |============================================================= GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 71.88 |==================================================================== 2 . 72.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 71.87 |====================================================================