EPYC Ondemand vs. Performance vs. Schedutil Linux 5.11

patch testing by Michael Larabel.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2102055-HA-EPYC7F52L26
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

AV1 2 Tests
Timed Code Compilation 2 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 9 Tests
CPU Massive 10 Tests
Creator Workloads 14 Tests
Encoding 5 Tests
Game Development 4 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 3 Tests
Imaging 2 Tests
Multi-Core 16 Tests
NVIDIA GPU Compute 3 Tests
Intel oneAPI 3 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 2 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 2 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Renderers 3 Tests
Server CPU Tests 8 Tests
Video Encoding 5 Tests
Common Workstation Benchmarks 3 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
Ondemand
February 04 2021
  2 Hours, 34 Minutes
Schedutil
February 04 2021
  2 Hours, 36 Minutes
Performance
February 05 2021
  2 Hours, 32 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  2 Hours, 34 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

EPYC Ondemand vs. Performance vs. Schedutil Linux 5.11, "Blender 2.90 - Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",82.9,83.97,84.12 "Schedutil",83.09,83.94,83.69 "Performance",82.79,84.5,83.9 "Blender 2.90 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",356.55,358.15,358 "Schedutil",356.64,357.65,358.17 "Performance",356.18,356.25,358.26 "CLOMP 1.2 - Static OMP Speedup", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",49.5,49.4,50.2 "Schedutil",49.8,50.9,50.1 "Performance",51.5,50.1,50.4 "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",627.11,623.23,625.96 "Schedutil",536.14,536.32,537.49 "Performance",710.03,715.33,714.19 "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",254.18,254.31,254.37 "Schedutil",247.17,246.56,246.86 "Performance",265.29,265.44,264.22 "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",587.48,595.3,594.25 "Schedutil",488.62,487.31,490.93 "Performance",667.23,669.78,668.5 "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",119.16,119.44,118.78 "Schedutil",92.05,92.28,92.29 "Performance",131.59,131.75,131.89 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Swirl", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand", "Schedutil",925,922,923 "Performance", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Rotate", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",629,642,644 "Schedutil",631,643,644 "Performance",621,633,634 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Sharpen", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand", "Schedutil", "Performance", "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Enhanced", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand", "Schedutil", "Performance",378,377,377 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Resizing", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",1591,1572,1582 "Schedutil",1607,1550,1604 "Performance",1611,1610,1607 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: Noise-Gaussian", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",420,422,420 "Schedutil",420,421,422 "Performance",419,421,421 "GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 - Operation: HWB Color Space", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",1274,1273,1266 "Schedutil",1116,1122,1124 "Performance",1235,1235,1246 "Hugin - Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",50.862,50.003,51.096 "Schedutil",50.787,50.235,50.371 "Performance",50.222,50.02,50.983 "Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 - Scene: Memorial", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",14.13313697695,14.197184698274,14.238969782058 "Schedutil",14.223658495649,14.265192786948,14.281307482263 "Performance",14.185604448606,14.197809561941,14.298399008263 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",26343,26275,26275 "Schedutil",26352,26304,26275 "Performance",26371,26304,26295 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",1726000,1717000,1716000 "Schedutil",1727000,1718000,1718000 "Performance",1727000,1720000,1717000 "Kvazaar 2.0 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",25.41,25.33,25.31 "Schedutil",26.3,26.25,26.25 "Performance",26.49,26.3,26.39 "Kvazaar 2.0 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",47.11,46.64,46.83 "Schedutil",47.57,47.59,47.74 "Performance",47.82,47.76,47.82 "Kvazaar 2.0 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",87.49,86.59,87.4 "Schedutil",86.83,87.29,86.56 "Performance",92.17,92.12,92.38 "Kvazaar 2.0 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",156.05,156.55,155.3 "Schedutil",152.55,153.52,152.96 "Performance",161.62,162.61,161.67 "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: DLSC", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",3.15,3.17,3.14 "Schedutil",3.28,3.19,3.11 "Performance",3.16,3.12,3.27 "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",3.48,3.46,3.49 "Schedutil",3.6,3.55,3.57 "Performance",3.5,3.52,3.52 "OCRMyPDF 9.6.0+dfsg - Processing 60 Page PDF Document", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",19.501,19.521,19.616 "Schedutil",19.579,19.601,19.268 "Performance",19.304,19.335,19.203 "OpenVKL 0.9 - Benchmark: vklBenchmark", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",218,219,220 "Schedutil",216,219,217 "Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",24.390243902439,24.390243902439,24.390243902439 "Schedutil",24.390243902439,24.390243902439,24.390243902439 "Performance",24.390243902439,24.390243902439,24.390243902439 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",1.865671641791,1.865671641791,1.8587360594796 "Schedutil",1.8691588785047,1.865671641791,1.8621973929237 "Performance",1.865671641791,1.8691588785047,1.865671641791 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",33.333333333333,33.333333333333,33.333333333333 "Schedutil",33.333333333333,33.333333333333,33.333333333333 "Performance",33.333333333333,33.333333333333,33.333333333333 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",7.0921985815603,7.0921985815603,7.0921985815603 "Schedutil",7.1428571428571,7.0921985815603,7.0921985815603 "Performance",7.1428571428571,7.0921985815603,7.0921985815603 "Pennant 1.0.1 - Test: sedovbig", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",25.58936,25.5895,25.65337 "Schedutil",25.48869,25.67024,25.63117 "Performance",25.51519,25.52415,25.58837 "Pennant 1.0.1 - Test: leblancbig", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",15.90606,15.90593,16.27702 "Schedutil",15.99428,16.07133,15.91479 "Performance",15.91986,15.89111,15.91843 "RAR Compression 5.6.1 - Linux Source Tree Archiving To RAR", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",75.241,74.642,75.065 "Schedutil",77.235,76.1,77.427 "Performance",68.151,67.539,67.338 "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",1521838.38,1566421.12,1546820.12 "Schedutil",1622854.88,1628149.75,1547064.25 "Performance",1578282.88,1617599.5,1617086.62 "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",1303785.12,1306002.88,1314751.5 "Schedutil",1358146.38,1318913.25,1278159.5,1300221 "Performance",1349896.38,1314755.75,1290489.12 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP LavaMD", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",125.964,126.38,126.823 "Schedutil",125.449,126.189,126.294 "Performance",125.325,126.094,126.224 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",90.197,89.998,89.93 "Schedutil",91.786,91.013,91.131 "Performance",92.845,92.16,91.257 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP Leukocyte", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",89.996,89.696,88.115 "Schedutil",89.807,90.937,90.55 "Performance",90.023,89.138,89.965 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP CFD Solver", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",13.269,13.219,13.24 "Schedutil",13.259,13.252,13.231 "Performance",13.354,13.317,13.322 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP Streamcluster", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",13.817,13.736,13.755 "Schedutil",13.702,13.825,13.736 "Performance",13.715,13.737,13.664 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",5.159,5.245,5.327 "Schedutil",5.33,5.414,5.394 "Performance",5.389,5.434,5.47 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",41.242,40.952,40.874 "Schedutil",43.449,42.707,42.965 "Performance",43.051,42.769,42.65 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: SqueezeNet", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",107091,107356,107334 "Schedutil",107138,107407,107336 "Performance",107472,107324,107374 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception V4", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",1504350,1503780,1505110 "Schedutil",1502570,1503310,1503400 "Performance",1502840,1503420,1503630 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: NASNet Mobile", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",126798,126693,127144 "Schedutil",125908,126048,125988 "Performance",125881,126776,125952 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Mobilenet Float", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",68965.4,69040.8,69111.6 "Schedutil",68974.1,69048,69016.5 "Performance",68903.8,69018,69008.8 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Mobilenet Quant", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",70631,70743.8,70590.6 "Schedutil",70706.6,70762.5,70812.7 "Performance",70683.6,70789.3,70744.3 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception ResNet V2", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",1350710,1351830,1351780 "Schedutil",1349920,1351270,1350770 "Performance",1349710,1351020,1351270 "Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",95.494,95.564,95.418 "Schedutil",89.51,89.505,89.802 "Performance",83.598,83.663,83.866 "Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "Ondemand",84.466,84.399,84.551 "Schedutil",83.249,83.285,83.406 "Performance",83.021,83.229,83.242 "x264 2019-12-17 - H.264 Video Encoding", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",171.02,172.11,174.79 "Schedutil",169.82,174,173.97 "Performance",174.4,176.05,179.16 "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",21.79,21.41,21.75 "Schedutil",21.12,20.99,21.03 "Performance",21.8,21.37,21.34 "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "Ondemand",65.75,65.27,65.38 "Schedutil",55.7,54.54,54.96 "Performance",68.25,68.62,68.57