1270 v5 2021 Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 testing with a ASUS E3 PRO GAMING V5 (2606 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA NV84 256MB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS E3 PRO GAMING V5 (2606 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA NV84 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.2.1, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS E3 PRO GAMING V5 (2606 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA NV84 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.2.1, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 @ 4.00GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS E3 PRO GAMING V5 (2606 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: ASUS NVIDIA NV84 256MB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: DELL S2409W, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-33-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.2.1, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 152141467 |================================================================ 2 . 151089400 |================================================================ 3 . 151352533 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 892.41 |=================================================================== 2 . 896.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 890.75 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1166.33 |================================================================== 2 . 1146.75 |================================================================= 3 . 1146.85 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 855.67 |=================================================================== 2 . 851.96 |=================================================================== 3 . 835.73 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1014.59 |================================================================== 2 . 1020.10 |================================================================== 3 . 995.63 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 794.56 |================================================================== 2 . 810.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 804.64 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1290.99 |================================================================== 2 . 1290.42 |================================================================== 3 . 1292.52 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 47.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 48.43 |==================================================================== 3 . 47.71 |=================================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 573.00 |=================================================================== 2 . 571.28 |================================================================== 3 . 575.65 |=================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1272.44 |================================================================== 2 . 1267.66 |================================================================== 3 . 1273.14 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 298.27 |=================================================================== 2 . 297.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 297.79 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 77.74 |==================================================================== 2 . 78.16 |==================================================================== 3 . 78.15 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 277.40 |=================================================================== 2 . 278.33 |=================================================================== 3 . 276.47 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 66.03 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.02 |==================================================================== 3 . 65.98 |==================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1140.63 |================================================================== 2 . 1132.61 |================================================================= 3 . 1141.49 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 294.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 295.02 |=================================================================== 3 . 294.15 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 162.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 162.72 |=================================================================== 3 . 162.80 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 275.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 276.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 276.42 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 234.60 |=================================================================== 2 . 233.57 |=================================================================== 3 . 233.54 |=================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 74.30 |==================================================================== 2 . 73.92 |==================================================================== 3 . 73.62 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 593.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 591.60 |=================================================================== 3 . 593.28 |=================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 21978013 |================================================================= 2 . 22067093 |================================================================= 3 . 22112433 |================================================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.275 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.313 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.299 |==================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1151.24 |================================================================== 2 . 1154.41 |================================================================== 3 . 1157.23 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 38 |======================================================================= 2 . 38 |======================================================================= 3 . 38 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 104 |====================================================================== 2 . 104 |====================================================================== 3 . 104 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 449 |====================================================================== 2 . 450 |====================================================================== 3 . 445 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1587 |===================================================================== 2 . 1592 |===================================================================== 3 . 1578 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 80 |====================================================================== 2 . 80 |====================================================================== 3 . 81 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1735 |===================================================================== 2 . 1737 |===================================================================== 3 . 1728 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 88 |====================================================================== 2 . 89 |======================================================================= 3 . 89 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 444 |====================================================================== 2 . 444 |====================================================================== 3 . 444 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 424 |====================================================================== 2 . 424 |====================================================================== 3 . 423 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 552 |====================================================================== 2 . 552 |====================================================================== 3 . 552 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 167 |====================================================================== 2 . 168 |====================================================================== 3 . 168 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 637 |====================================================================== 2 . 637 |====================================================================== 3 . 638 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 207 |====================================================================== 2 . 206 |====================================================================== 3 . 207 |====================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 14.66 |================================================================ 2 . 15.22 |================================================================== 3 . 15.64 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 76.60 |=============================================================== 2 . 82.98 |==================================================================== 3 . 77.55 |================================================================ Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.740 |=================================================================== 2 . 8.683 |====================================================== 3 . 8.759 |======================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.78 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.23 |================================================================= 3 . 10.43 |================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 107.92 |================================================================== 2 . 109.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 107.20 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12860.10 |================================================================= 2 . 12912.20 |================================================================= 3 . 12950.43 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2726.41 |================================================================ 2 . 2827.19 |================================================================== 3 . 2727.43 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 461.80 |=================================================================== 2 . 459.30 |=================================================================== 3 . 453.85 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 499.55 |================================================================= 2 . 504.90 |================================================================== 3 . 511.23 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6997.23 |================================================================== 2 . 6991.02 |================================================================== 3 . 6959.42 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13271.56 |================================================================= 2 . 13212.35 |================================================================= 3 . 13244.27 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6687.26 |================================================================== 2 . 6684.93 |================================================================== 3 . 6678.77 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4225.83 |================================================================== 2 . 4150.90 |================================================================= 3 . 4217.96 |================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 93 |====================================================================== 2 . 94 |======================================================================= 3 . 93 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 133 |====================================================================== 2 . 131 |===================================================================== 3 . 133 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 22 |======================================================================= 2 . 22 |======================================================================= 3 . 22 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 6848 |===================================================================== 2 . 6824 |===================================================================== 3 . 6833 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 1129 |==================================================================== 2 . 1124 |==================================================================== 3 . 1139 |===================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 423.56 |=================================================================== 2 . 424.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 423.60 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 177.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 174.23 |================================================================== 3 . 175.62 |================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 119.17 |=================================================================== 2 . 116.51 |================================================================== 3 . 117.97 |================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.10 |=================================================================== 2 . 37.90 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.60 |=================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2143.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2140.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2117.4 |================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.324 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.323 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.311 |================================================================= rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.924 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.915 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.917 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.195 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.177 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.183 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.636 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.615 |=================================================================== 3 . 2.628 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2431438.83 |=============================================================== 2 . 1541401.50 |======================================== 3 . 1534665.80 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1923601.34 |============================================================= 2 . 1983903.96 |=============================================================== 3 . 1954648.41 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1508382.38 |============================================================= 2 . 1546805.62 |=============================================================== 3 . 1529103.29 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2329946.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 2145854.30 |========================================================== 3 . 2129311.00 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1741953.12 |=============================================================== 2 . 1726734.50 |============================================================== 3 . 1746739.79 |=============================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 350.44 |=================================================================== 2 . 350.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 350.62 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 429.30 |=================================================================== 2 . 427.16 |=================================================================== 3 . 430.16 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 348.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 349.05 |=================================================================== 3 . 348.89 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.865 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.931 |==================================================================== 3 . 9.913 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 586.52 |=================================================================== 2 . 584.75 |=================================================================== 3 . 585.51 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1077.94 |================================================================== 2 . 1076.03 |================================================================== 3 . 1078.56 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 34.81 |==================================================================== 2 . 34.80 |==================================================================== 3 . 34.80 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2273.12 |================================================================== 2 . 2275.29 |================================================================== 3 . 2274.37 |==================================================================