8700K Feb Intel Core i7-8700K testing with a ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (2001 BIOS) and ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (2001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 128GB Toshiba THNSN5128GPU7, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200923-generic (x86_64) 20200922, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: asus, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (2001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 128GB Toshiba THNSN5128GPU7, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200923-generic (x86_64) 20200922, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: asus, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-8700K @ 4.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (2001 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 128GB Toshiba THNSN5128GPU7, Graphics: ASUS Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200923-generic (x86_64) 20200922, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: asus, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2704.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 2690.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 2693.6 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1390.33 |================================================================== 2 . 1390.06 |================================================================== 3 . 1390.73 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 350.32 |=================================================================== 2 . 351.31 |=================================================================== 3 . 351.01 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 199.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 199.93 |=================================================================== 3 . 199.78 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 334.41 |=================================================================== 2 . 333.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 335.00 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 922.21 |================================================================== 2 . 931.61 |=================================================================== 3 . 928.98 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 945.25 |=================================================================== 2 . 946.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 947.44 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 23345.74 |================================================================= 2 . 23353.58 |================================================================= 3 . 23355.44 |================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 46 |======================================================================= 2 . 46 |======================================================================= 3 . 46 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 124 |====================================================================== 2 . 124 |====================================================================== 3 . 124 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 552 |===================================================================== 2 . 554 |====================================================================== 3 . 557 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1925 |===================================================================== 2 . 1927 |===================================================================== 3 . 1928 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102 |====================================================================== 2 . 100 |===================================================================== 3 . 102 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2116 |===================================================================== 2 . 2105 |===================================================================== 3 . 2109 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 120 |====================================================================== 2 . 116 |==================================================================== 3 . 119 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 550 |====================================================================== 2 . 550 |====================================================================== 3 . 550 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 494 |====================================================================== 2 . 490 |===================================================================== 3 . 496 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 678 |====================================================================== 2 . 674 |====================================================================== 3 . 676 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 210 |====================================================================== 2 . 209 |====================================================================== 3 . 210 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 781 |====================================================================== 2 . 781 |====================================================================== 3 . 781 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 251 |====================================================================== 2 . 250 |====================================================================== 3 . 251 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1215 |===================================================================== 2 . 1216 |===================================================================== 3 . 1215 |===================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 106.71 |=================================================================== 2 . 106.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 106.27 |=================================================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 69.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 69.26 |==================================================================== 3 . 69.01 |==================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 26.71 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.39 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 192.20 |=================================================================== 2 . 192.15 |=================================================================== 3 . 191.59 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.769 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.774 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.727 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 325.44 |=================================================================== 2 . 326.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 325.90 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 599.31 |================================================================== 2 . 600.13 |================================================================== 3 . 605.51 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.45 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.45 |==================================================================== 3 . 18.49 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1179.55 |================================================================== 2 . 1178.81 |================================================================== 3 . 1179.49 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 57262.70 |================================================================ 2 . 57455.34 |================================================================= 3 . 57896.76 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 100651.78 |================================================================ 2 . 100197.16 |================================================================ 3 . 100853.07 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1227.62 |================================================================== 2 . 1227.46 |================================================================== 3 . 1229.03 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1860.12 |================================================================== 2 . 1859.04 |================================================================== 3 . 1862.29 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1772.94 |================================================================== 2 . 1757.11 |================================================================= 3 . 1773.04 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1886.27 |================================================================== 2 . 1880.38 |================================================================== 3 . 1880.26 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1315.96 |================================================================== 2 . 1313.77 |================================================================== 3 . 1315.94 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2042.91 |================================================================== 2 . 2042.91 |================================================================== 3 . 2048.12 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 188.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 189.04 |=================================================================== 3 . 188.80 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3039004.83 |=============================================================== 2 . 1961499.58 |========================================= 3 . 1963124.96 |========================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2466394.08 |=============================================================== 2 . 2476168.42 |=============================================================== 3 . 2479749.00 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1891206.20 |============================================================== 2 . 1907896.46 |============================================================== 3 . 1935673.62 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2938114.75 |=============================================================== 2 . 2703368.25 |========================================================== 3 . 2742246.08 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2201528.42 |=============================================================== 2 . 2191017.80 |=============================================================== 3 . 2192996.00 |=============================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 65.17 |==================================================================== 2 . 64.92 |==================================================================== 3 . 65.14 |====================================================================