7740X 2021 Intel Core i7-7740K testing with a Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming-CF (F4d BIOS) and MSI NVIDIA NV138 2GB on Ubuntu 18.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-7740K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming-CF (F4d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV138 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 18.2.2, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-7740K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming-CF (F4d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV138 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 18.2.2, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-7740K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming-CF (F4d BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 120GB Corsair Force MP500, Graphics: MSI NVIDIA NV138 2GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1220, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 18.10, Kernel: 4.18.0-25-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.30.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.1, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 18.2.2, Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 14.6 |=============================================================== 2 . 14.6 |=============================================================== 3 . 15.9 |===================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2227.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 2208.1 |================================================================== 3 . 2217.6 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1465.26 |================================================================== 2 . 1466.53 |================================================================== 3 . 1471.46 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 342.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 341.49 |=================================================================== 3 . 342.01 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 190.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 190.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 190.31 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 325.42 |=================================================================== 2 . 326.07 |=================================================================== 3 . 319.83 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 18788.38 |================================================================= 2 . 18886.20 |================================================================= 3 . 18818.65 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4506.06 |================================================================== 2 . 4539.34 |================================================================== 3 . 4527.43 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 281.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 281.22 |=================================================================== 3 . 282.19 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 280.97 |=================================================================== 2 . 282.62 |=================================================================== 3 . 282.70 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9615.60 |================================================================== 2 . 9683.20 |================================================================== 3 . 9616.73 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20282.45 |================================================================= 2 . 20296.95 |================================================================= 3 . 20272.43 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9382.87 |================================================================== 2 . 9381.19 |================================================================== 3 . 9381.42 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5428.10 |================================================================== 2 . 5393.60 |================================================================== 3 . 5357.95 |================================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 165.67 |================================================================ 2 . 170.60 |================================================================== 3 . 172.86 |=================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1004.89 |================================================================= 2 . 1002.33 |================================================================= 3 . 1017.29 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 46 |======================================================================= 2 . 46 |======================================================================= 3 . 46 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 125 |====================================================================== 2 . 125 |====================================================================== 3 . 125 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 578 |====================================================================== 2 . 578 |====================================================================== 3 . 577 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1905 |===================================================================== 2 . 1907 |===================================================================== 3 . 1907 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102 |====================================================================== 2 . 101 |===================================================================== 3 . 101 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2046 |===================================================================== 2 . 2043 |===================================================================== 3 . 2044 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 117 |====================================================================== 2 . 115 |===================================================================== 3 . 115 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 532 |====================================================================== 2 . 532 |====================================================================== 3 . 532 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 503 |====================================================================== 2 . 502 |====================================================================== 3 . 501 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 697 |====================================================================== 2 . 699 |====================================================================== 3 . 698 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 207 |====================================================================== 2 . 207 |====================================================================== 3 . 207 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 807 |====================================================================== 2 . 807 |====================================================================== 3 . 808 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 260 |====================================================================== 2 . 260 |====================================================================== 3 . 260 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1297 |===================================================================== 2 . 1297 |===================================================================== 3 . 1296 |===================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 238192000 |================================================================ 2 . 237948167 |================================================================ 3 . 237882700 |================================================================ QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 25.05 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.82 |=================================================================== 3 . 25.05 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 314.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 313.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 313.87 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.584 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.597 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.603 |==================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1472.04 |================================================================== 2 . 1475.62 |================================================================== 3 . 1475.89 |================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.299 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.295 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.301 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.700 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.698 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.703 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3.651 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.629 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.627 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 213.74 |=================================================================== 2 . 214.08 |=================================================================== 3 . 213.02 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 199.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 199.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 198.41 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.317 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.344 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.308 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 428.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 428.15 |=================================================================== 3 . 427.00 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 778.95 |=================================================================== 2 . 777.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 778.27 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 23.71 |==================================================================== 2 . 23.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 23.68 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1508.23 |================================================================== 2 . 1507.39 |================================================================== 3 . 1507.58 |================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 688.22 |=================================================================== 2 . 687.49 |=================================================================== 3 . 684.38 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1436.51 |================================================================== 2 . 1420.95 |================================================================= 3 . 1410.84 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1525.56 |================================================================== 2 . 1519.98 |================================================================== 3 . 1480.21 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1069.31 |================================================================ 2 . 1082.38 |================================================================= 3 . 1094.23 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1849.00 |================================================================== 2 . 1844.75 |================================================================== 3 . 1840.50 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 174.52 |=================================================================== 2 . 174.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 174.52 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1711499 |================================================================== 2 . 1709747 |================================================================== 3 . 1716185 |================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1003743 |================================================================== 2 . 1004383 |================================================================== 3 . 1003743 |================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2534.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 2528.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 2501.1 |================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2505.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 2500.4 |=================================================================== 3 . 2502.0 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 823.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 823.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 825.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 838.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 842.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 842.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 458.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 458.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 458.9 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 457.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 457.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 457.1 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2332.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2335.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 2337.2 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2334.8 |=================================================================== 2 . 2327.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 2331.2 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 826.0 |==================================================================== 2 . 825.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 825.4 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 841.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 842.0 |==================================================================== 3 . 841.8 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 458.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 458.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 458.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 457.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 456.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 456.9 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3123976.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 1928584.08 |======================================= 3 . 1813597.74 |===================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2496925.33 |=============================================================== 2 . 2318989.32 |=========================================================== 3 . 2478938.45 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1836556.21 |=============================================================== 2 . 1840911.05 |=============================================================== 3 . 1809531.40 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2882639.37 |=============================================================== 2 . 2794424.58 |============================================================= 3 . 2765579.08 |============================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2187012.83 |=============================================================== 2 . 2195863.25 |=============================================================== 3 . 2203297.30 |=============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.313 |=================================================================== 2 . 5.391 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.382 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 31.69 |=================================================================== 3 . 31.84 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.138 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.135 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.153 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.540 |=================================================================== 2 . 3.561 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.567 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 39.81 |==================================================================== 2 . 39.84 |==================================================================== 3 . 39.96 |==================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 302.15 |=================================================================== 2 . 302.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 302.20 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 293.61 |=================================================================== 2 . 293.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 293.88 |=================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.18 |==================================================================== 2 . 63.24 |==================================================================== 3 . 62.70 |=================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 32427093 |================================================================= 2 . 32307873 |================================================================ 3 . 32562200 |=================================================================