i5 8400 EO January Intel Core i5-8400 testing with a MSI Z370M MORTAR (MS-7B54) v1.0 (1.80 BIOS) and MSI Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i5-8400 @ 4.00GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI Z370M MORTAR (MS-7B54) v1.0 (1.80 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 512GB INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8, Graphics: MSI Intel UHD 630 3GB (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200929-generic (x86_64) 20200928, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: msi, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i5-8400 @ 4.00GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI Z370M MORTAR (MS-7B54) v1.0 (1.80 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 512GB INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8, Graphics: MSI Intel UHD 630 3GB (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200929-generic (x86_64) 20200928, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: msi, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i5-8400 @ 4.00GHz (6 Cores), Motherboard: MSI Z370M MORTAR (MS-7B54) v1.0 (1.80 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 512GB INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8, Graphics: MSI Intel UHD 630 3GB (1050MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20200929-generic (x86_64) 20200928, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: msi, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2293.7 |=================================================================== 2 . 2278.1 |=================================================================== 3 . 2281.3 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1169.98 |================================================================ 2 . 1200.64 |================================================================== 3 . 1201.55 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 299.90 |=================================================================== 2 . 300.24 |=================================================================== 3 . 300.56 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 170.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 170.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 170.40 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 285.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 285.23 |=================================================================== 3 . 285.64 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 822.44 |================================================================== 2 . 826.12 |================================================================== 3 . 839.13 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 824.41 |================================================================== 2 . 826.07 |================================================================== 3 . 838.46 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22132.32 |================================================================ 2 . 22430.92 |================================================================= 3 . 22450.11 |================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 39 |======================================================================= 2 . 39 |======================================================================= 3 . 39 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105 |===================================================================== 2 . 105 |===================================================================== 3 . 106 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 470 |===================================================================== 2 . 474 |====================================================================== 3 . 471 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1642 |===================================================================== 2 . 1643 |===================================================================== 3 . 1638 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 84 |===================================================================== 2 . 86 |======================================================================= 3 . 85 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1797 |===================================================================== 2 . 1808 |===================================================================== 3 . 1806 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 99 |===================================================================== 2 . 100 |====================================================================== 3 . 100 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 464 |====================================================================== 2 . 464 |====================================================================== 3 . 464 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 421 |====================================================================== 2 . 421 |====================================================================== 3 . 421 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 576 |====================================================================== 2 . 575 |====================================================================== 3 . 577 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 177 |====================================================================== 2 . 176 |====================================================================== 3 . 177 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 664 |====================================================================== 2 . 662 |====================================================================== 3 . 662 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 213 |====================================================================== 2 . 212 |====================================================================== 3 . 213 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1031 |===================================================================== 2 . 1031 |===================================================================== 3 . 1031 |===================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 29.37 |=================================================================== 2 . 29.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 29.41 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 226.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 226.41 |=================================================================== 3 . 226.14 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.205 |=================================================================== 2 . 7.295 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.175 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 408.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 410.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 409.18 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 762.12 |================================================================== 2 . 769.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 767.61 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 24.46 |==================================================================== 2 . 24.46 |==================================================================== 3 . 24.45 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1543.29 |================================================================== 2 . 1543.61 |================================================================== 3 . 1544.08 |================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 630.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 623.56 |================================================================== 3 . 630.08 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 141.10 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 160.84 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4258.04 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1112.26 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 177006 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1040.18 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 21907 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7137.98 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15287 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 34017 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44193 |==================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1188.94 |================================================================== 2 . 1191.89 |================================================================== 3 . 1193.08 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1761.99 |================================================================== 2 . 1767.84 |================================================================== 3 . 1768.49 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1591.37 |================================================================== 2 . 1595.74 |================================================================== 3 . 1572.09 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1457.91 |================================================================== 2 . 1468.79 |================================================================== 3 . 1440.82 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1174.66 |================================================================= 2 . 1185.18 |================================================================= 3 . 1195.83 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1870.67 |================================================================== 2 . 1883.91 |================================================================== 3 . 1879.47 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 173.81 |=================================================================== 2 . 174.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 174.52 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2580409.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 1633576.42 |======================================== 3 . 1627203.75 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2071122.29 |=============================================================== 2 . 2054611.54 |============================================================== 3 . 2043586.41 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1615140.91 |=============================================================== 2 . 1609463.95 |=============================================================== 3 . 1614637.71 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2462391.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 2305137.50 |=========================================================== 3 . 2307391.20 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1868760.96 |=============================================================== 2 . 1869037.63 |=============================================================== 3 . 1873911.08 |=============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 314 |====================================================================== 2 . 315 |====================================================================== 3 . 315 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 513 |====================================================================== 2 . 511 |====================================================================== 3 . 513 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 54 |======================================================================= 2 . 54 |======================================================================= 3 . 54 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 16909 |=================================================================== 2 . 17082 |==================================================================== 3 . 16959 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 3624 |=================================================================== 2 . 3711 |===================================================================== 3 . 3705 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 76.20 |==================================================================== 2 . 75.85 |==================================================================== 3 . 75.94 |====================================================================