7700K 2021 EO Jan Intel Core i7-7700K testing with a MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0 (1.60 BIOS) and MSI Intel HD 630 on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0 (1.60 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI Intel HD 630 (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201011-generic (x86_64) 20201010, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: msi, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0 (1.60 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI Intel HD 630 (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201011-generic (x86_64) 20201010, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: msi, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.50GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: MSI Z270-A PRO (MS-7A71) v1.0 (1.60 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v6/7th + Z270, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 850, Graphics: MSI Intel HD 630 (1150MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: LG Ultra HD, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc8daily20201011-generic (x86_64) 20201010, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: msi, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2585.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2561.2 |================================================================== 3 . 2580.6 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 18528.55 |================================================================= 2 . 18590.69 |================================================================= 3 . 18548.38 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4539.97 |================================================================= 2 . 4578.08 |================================================================== 3 . 4581.97 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 649.92 |================================================================== 2 . 660.76 |=================================================================== 3 . 661.49 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 661.54 |=================================================================== 2 . 657.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 661.59 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10180.10 |================================================================= 2 . 10194.71 |================================================================= 3 . 10179.24 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19570.04 |================================================================= 2 . 19585.19 |================================================================= 3 . 19570.37 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9590.30 |================================================================== 2 . 9615.68 |================================================================== 3 . 9610.09 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5238.37 |================================================================== 2 . 5254.22 |================================================================== 3 . 5151.78 |================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44 |======================================================================= 2 . 44 |======================================================================= 3 . 44 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 119 |====================================================================== 2 . 119 |====================================================================== 3 . 119 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 534 |====================================================================== 2 . 535 |====================================================================== 3 . 533 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1850 |===================================================================== 2 . 1853 |===================================================================== 3 . 1854 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 98 |======================================================================= 2 . 97 |====================================================================== 3 . 97 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2032 |===================================================================== 2 . 2034 |===================================================================== 3 . 2031 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 110 |===================================================================== 2 . 111 |====================================================================== 3 . 111 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 527 |====================================================================== 2 . 527 |====================================================================== 3 . 527 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 474 |====================================================================== 2 . 476 |====================================================================== 3 . 475 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 650 |====================================================================== 2 . 648 |====================================================================== 3 . 649 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 201 |====================================================================== 2 . 201 |====================================================================== 3 . 201 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 750 |====================================================================== 2 . 750 |====================================================================== 3 . 750 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 240 |====================================================================== 2 . 239 |===================================================================== 3 . 241 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1164 |===================================================================== 2 . 1164 |===================================================================== 3 . 1164 |===================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 199.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 200.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 199.93 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.888 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.832 |=================================================================== 3 . 7.893 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 462.95 |=================================================================== 2 . 462.90 |=================================================================== 3 . 462.74 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 853.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 853.27 |=================================================================== 3 . 854.19 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.43 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.48 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.43 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 116.67 |=================================================================== 2 . 116.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 116.73 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 140.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 139.44 |=================================================================== 3 . 136.66 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4806.74 |================================================================== 2 . 4581.83 |=============================================================== 3 . 4591.18 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1016.42 |================================================================== 2 . 1018.82 |================================================================== 3 . 1023.86 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 231969 |=================================================================== 2 . 227163 |================================================================== 3 . 220617 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1167.08 |================================================================== 2 . 1167.96 |================================================================== 3 . 1156.46 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20013 |=================================================================== 2 . 20355 |==================================================================== 3 . 20130 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6599.43 |================================================================= 2 . 6569.00 |================================================================ 3 . 6738.72 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14530 |=================================================================== 2 . 14571 |==================================================================== 3 . 14659 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 28343 |==================================================================== 2 . 28400 |==================================================================== 3 . 28057 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37680 |==================================================================== 2 . 37563 |==================================================================== 3 . 37493 |==================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 62135.66 |================================================================= 2 . 62429.39 |================================================================= 3 . 62305.26 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 107019.91 |================================================================ 2 . 107244.05 |================================================================ 3 . 107057.03 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Monte-Carlo OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5530.07 |================================================================== 2 . 5517.95 |================================================================== 3 . 5509.85 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 41.62 |==================================================================== 2 . 41.59 |==================================================================== 3 . 41.62 |==================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1106.13 |================================================================== 2 . 1106.71 |================================================================== 3 . 1106.52 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1687.83 |================================================================== 2 . 1686.95 |================================================================== 3 . 1686.95 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1468.67 |================================================================== 2 . 1474.25 |================================================================== 3 . 1463.21 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1626.48 |================================================================== 2 . 1606.72 |================================================================= 3 . 1619.73 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1109.45 |================================================================== 2 . 1105.03 |================================================================== 3 . 1101.88 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1775.04 |================================================================== 2 . 1779.01 |================================================================== 3 . 1779.01 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 168.35 |=================================================================== 2 . 168.83 |=================================================================== 3 . 169.50 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3040497.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 1862920.75 |======================================= 3 . 1901688.50 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2409447.67 |=============================================================== 2 . 2415036.17 |=============================================================== 3 . 2413723.20 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1818215.32 |============================================================= 2 . 1869581.08 |=============================================================== 3 . 1848356.96 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2824517.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 2645913.25 |=========================================================== 3 . 2648091.75 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2151039.08 |=============================================================== 2 . 2139248.83 |============================================================== 3 . 2161439.92 |=============================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 67.65 |==================================================================== 2 . 67.35 |==================================================================== 3 . 67.28 |====================================================================