Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 testing with a ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101305-HA-XEONE5HAS31
Xeon E5 Haswell 2021
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 testing with a ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2
Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better
1 . 333264500 |================================================================
2 . 333615967 |================================================================
3 . 333464900 |================================================================
dav1d 0.8.1
Video Input: Chimera 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 446.57 |===================================================================
2 . 445.73 |===================================================================
3 . 441.18 |==================================================================
dav1d 0.8.1
Video Input: Summer Nature 4K
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 129.05 |===================================================================
2 . 128.51 |===================================================================
3 . 129.26 |===================================================================
dav1d 0.8.1
Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 362.38 |===================================================================
2 . 361.53 |===================================================================
3 . 356.18 |==================================================================
dav1d 0.8.1
Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit
FPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 66.67 |====================================================================
2 . 66.49 |====================================================================
3 . 66.29 |====================================================================
Warsow 2.5 Beta
Resolution: 1920 x 1080
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 21.3 |=====================================================================
2 . 21.3 |=====================================================================
3 . 21.3 |=====================================================================
rav1e 0.4
Speed: 1
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.294 |====================================================================
2 . 0.293 |====================================================================
3 . 0.292 |====================================================================
rav1e 0.4
Speed: 5
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 0.859 |====================================================================
2 . 0.855 |====================================================================
3 . 0.852 |===================================================================
rav1e 0.4
Speed: 6
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1.130 |====================================================================
2 . 1.124 |====================================================================
3 . 1.124 |====================================================================
rav1e 0.4
Speed: 10
Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2.484 |===================================================================
2 . 2.522 |====================================================================
3 . 2.483 |===================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 328 |======================================================================
2 . 328 |======================================================================
3 . 328 |======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 582 |======================================================================
2 . 582 |======================================================================
3 . 582 |======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 60 |=======================================================================
2 . 60 |=======================================================================
3 . 60 |=======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 10700 |====================================================================
2 . 10696 |====================================================================
3 . 10676 |====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 4352 |=====================================================================
2 . 4334 |=====================================================================
3 . 4347 |=====================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 249.38 |===================================================================
2 . 249.17 |===================================================================
3 . 249.17 |===================================================================
Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-sha512
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1442334 |==================================================================
2 . 1440358 |==================================================================
3 . 1441674 |==================================================================
Cryptsetup
PBKDF2-whirlpool
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 578472 |===================================================================
2 . 578049 |===================================================================
3 . 579110 |===================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 37 |=======================================================================
2 . 37 |=======================================================================
3 . 37 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 105 |======================================================================
2 . 105 |======================================================================
3 . 105 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 443 |======================================================================
2 . 441 |======================================================================
3 . 443 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1511 |====================================================================
2 . 1518 |=====================================================================
3 . 1525 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 73 |=======================================================================
2 . 73 |=======================================================================
3 . 73 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1572 |====================================================================
2 . 1587 |=====================================================================
3 . 1578 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 87 |=======================================================================
2 . 87 |=======================================================================
3 . 87 |=======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 470 |======================================================================
2 . 471 |======================================================================
3 . 470 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 397 |======================================================================
2 . 396 |======================================================================
3 . 396 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 553 |======================================================================
2 . 550 |======================================================================
3 . 553 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 164 |======================================================================
2 . 164 |======================================================================
3 . 164 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 642 |======================================================================
2 . 642 |======================================================================
3 . 644 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 201 |======================================================================
2 . 201 |======================================================================
3 . 201 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1081 |=====================================================================
2 . 1082 |=====================================================================
3 . 1080 |=====================================================================
QuantLib 1.21
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 1808.3 |===================================================================
2 . 1805.7 |===================================================================
3 . 1803.3 |===================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1873.5 |===================================================================
2 . 1882.9 |===================================================================
3 . 1881.7 |===================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1893.1 |===================================================================
2 . 1892.6 |===================================================================
3 . 1890.4 |===================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 601.4 |====================================================================
2 . 603.5 |====================================================================
3 . 602.5 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 584.7 |====================================================================
2 . 584.6 |====================================================================
3 . 583.3 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 377.3 |====================================================================
2 . 378.7 |====================================================================
3 . 378.6 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 378.8 |====================================================================
2 . 379.5 |====================================================================
3 . 378.7 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1556.0 |===================================================================
2 . 1557.8 |===================================================================
3 . 1555.6 |===================================================================
Cryptsetup
AES-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1545.6 |===================================================================
2 . 1547.7 |===================================================================
3 . 1544.5 |===================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 603.4 |====================================================================
2 . 602.6 |====================================================================
3 . 601.2 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 584.4 |====================================================================
2 . 584.8 |====================================================================
3 . 583.4 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 378.3 |====================================================================
2 . 378.7 |====================================================================
3 . 378.2 |====================================================================
Cryptsetup
Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption
MiB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 378.9 |====================================================================
2 . 379.1 |====================================================================
3 . 377.3 |====================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1414.22 |==================================================================
2 . 1415.15 |==================================================================
3 . 1414.53 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1880.56 |==================================================================
2 . 1881.67 |==================================================================
3 . 1881.12 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1560.99 |=================================================================
2 . 1591.53 |==================================================================
3 . 1595.06 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2295.31 |==================================================================
2 . 2288.77 |==================================================================
3 . 2295.31 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 1711.34 |==================================================================
2 . 1718.82 |==================================================================
3 . 1674.97 |================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 2162.83 |==================================================================
2 . 2174.68 |==================================================================
3 . 2133.39 |=================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: DXT1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1148.78 |==================================================================
2 . 1153.83 |==================================================================
3 . 1155.93 |==================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 250.28 |===================================================================
2 . 250.32 |===================================================================
3 . 249.51 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC2
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 149.07 |===================================================================
2 . 148.84 |===================================================================
3 . 149.11 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 240.45 |===================================================================
2 . 240.47 |===================================================================
3 . 240.11 |===================================================================
LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020
Model: Rhodopsin Protein
ns/day > Higher Is Better
1 . 5.045 |====================================================================
2 . 5.063 |====================================================================
3 . 5.063 |====================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2184273.00 |===============================================================
2 . 1392683.21 |========================================
3 . 1381617.17 |========================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1735755.75 |==============================================================
2 . 1767770.42 |===============================================================
3 . 1749575.63 |==============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1331267.79 |==============================================================
2 . 1347316.54 |===============================================================
3 . 1340317.13 |===============================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2117431.17 |===============================================================
2 . 1929425.96 |=========================================================
3 . 1945558.42 |==========================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1612741.71 |===============================================================
2 . 1564875.57 |=============================================================
3 . 1579700.62 |==============================================================
Kripke 1.2.4
Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better
1 . 42778687 |=================================================================
2 . 42986933 |=================================================================
3 . 42728223 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: CG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 4720.22 |==================================================================
2 . 4729.76 |==================================================================
3 . 4719.69 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 953.43 |===================================================================
2 . 938.84 |==================================================================
3 . 940.83 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 960.23 |===================================================================
2 . 933.49 |=================================================================
3 . 959.77 |===================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: FT.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 13022.66 |================================================================
2 . 13203.92 |=================================================================
3 . 13190.13 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 25421.02 |=================================================================
2 . 25115.18 |================================================================
3 . 25428.46 |=================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: MG.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 16156.63 |=================================================================
2 . 15664.08 |===============================================================
3 . 16170.45 |=================================================================
Google SynthMark 20201109
Test: VoiceMark_100
Voices > Higher Is Better
1 . 582.14 |===================================================================
2 . 582.01 |===================================================================
3 . 582.31 |===================================================================
LULESH 2.0.3
z/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 5187.42 |==================================================================
2 . 5192.27 |==================================================================
3 . 5200.25 |==================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Repo OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 62310.58 |=================================================================
2 . 62205.91 |=================================================================
3 . 62019.24 |=================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 106201.33 |================================================================
2 . 105922.05 |================================================================
3 . 105740.31 |================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1
Model: SqueezeNetV1.0
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 7.258 |====================================================================
2 . 7.259 |====================================================================
3 . 7.273 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1
Model: resnet-v2-50
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 40.64 |===================================================================
2 . 41.00 |====================================================================
3 . 40.77 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1
Model: MobileNetV2_224
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 3.723 |====================================================================
2 . 3.713 |====================================================================
3 . 3.716 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1
Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 2.957 |===================================================================
2 . 2.979 |====================================================================
3 . 2.970 |====================================================================
Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1
Model: inception-v3
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 44.27 |====================================================================
2 . 44.28 |====================================================================
3 . 44.15 |====================================================================
TNN 0.2.3
Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 309.70 |===================================================================
2 . 309.84 |===================================================================
3 . 311.22 |===================================================================
TNN 0.2.3
Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 296.83 |===================================================================
2 . 296.39 |===================================================================
3 . 296.16 |===================================================================
CloverLeaf
Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 135.59 |===================================================================
2 . 135.41 |===================================================================
3 . 132.34 |=================================================================
CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1
Fayalite-FIST Data
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 1366.24 |==================================================================
2 . 1361.66 |==================================================================
3 . 1359.18 |==================================================================
OpenFOAM 8
Input: Motorbike 30M
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 198.64 |===================================================================
2 . 198.14 |===================================================================
3 . 198.05 |===================================================================
Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7
Input: AUSURF112
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 2235.80 |==================================================================
2 . 2229.12 |==================================================================
3 . 2237.21 |==================================================================
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3
Time To Compile
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 197.72 |==================================================================
2 . 199.48 |===================================================================
3 . 197.97 |==================================================================
Gcrypt Library 1.9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 248.83 |===================================================================
2 . 250.66 |===================================================================
3 . 249.97 |===================================================================
WebP2 Image Encode 20210126
Encode Settings: Default
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 6.167 |====================================================================
2 . 6.145 |====================================================================
3 . 6.146 |====================================================================
WebP2 Image Encode 20210126
Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 336.02 |===================================================================
2 . 337.12 |===================================================================
3 . 336.05 |===================================================================
WebP2 Image Encode 20210126
Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 613.03 |===================================================================
2 . 610.96 |===================================================================
3 . 614.86 |===================================================================
WebP2 Image Encode 20210126
Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 16.29 |====================================================================
2 . 16.28 |====================================================================
3 . 16.30 |====================================================================
GnuPG 2.2.27
2.7GB Sample File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 74.61 |====================================================================
2 . 74.19 |====================================================================
3 . 74.32 |====================================================================
QMCPACK 3.10
Input: simple-H2O
Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 37.70 |===================================================================
2 . 37.69 |===================================================================
3 . 38.07 |====================================================================