Xeon E5 Haswell 2021

Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 testing with a ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101305-HA-XEONE5HAS31
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

AV1 2 Tests
BLAS (Basic Linear Algebra Sub-Routine) Tests 2 Tests
C++ Boost Tests 3 Tests
C/C++ Compiler Tests 2 Tests
CPU Massive 7 Tests
Creator Workloads 6 Tests
Cryptography 3 Tests
Encoding 2 Tests
Finance 2 Tests
Fortran Tests 4 Tests
Game Development 2 Tests
HPC - High Performance Computing 14 Tests
LAPACK (Linear Algebra Pack) Tests 2 Tests
Machine Learning 3 Tests
Molecular Dynamics 5 Tests
MPI Benchmarks 4 Tests
Multi-Core 6 Tests
OpenMPI Tests 10 Tests
Programmer / Developer System Benchmarks 3 Tests
Python Tests 2 Tests
Scientific Computing 9 Tests
Server CPU Tests 4 Tests
Single-Threaded 3 Tests
Video Encoding 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1
January 28 2021
  7 Hours, 13 Minutes
2
January 29 2021
  7 Hours, 10 Minutes
3
January 29 2021
  7 Hours, 10 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  7 Hours, 11 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

Xeon E5 Haswell 2021 Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 testing with a ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1442334 |================================================================== 2 . 1440358 |================================================================== 3 . 1441674 |================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 578472 |=================================================================== 2 . 578049 |=================================================================== 3 . 579110 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1873.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 1882.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 1881.7 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1893.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 1892.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 1890.4 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 601.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 603.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 602.5 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 584.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 584.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 583.3 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 377.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 378.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 378.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 378.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 379.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 378.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1556.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 1557.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 1555.6 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1545.6 |=================================================================== 2 . 1547.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 1544.5 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 603.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 602.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 601.2 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 584.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 584.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 583.4 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 378.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 378.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 378.2 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 378.9 |==================================================================== 2 . 379.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 377.3 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37 |======================================================================= 2 . 37 |======================================================================= 3 . 37 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105 |====================================================================== 2 . 105 |====================================================================== 3 . 105 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 443 |====================================================================== 2 . 441 |====================================================================== 3 . 443 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1511 |==================================================================== 2 . 1518 |===================================================================== 3 . 1525 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 73 |======================================================================= 2 . 73 |======================================================================= 3 . 73 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1572 |==================================================================== 2 . 1587 |===================================================================== 3 . 1578 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 87 |======================================================================= 2 . 87 |======================================================================= 3 . 87 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 470 |====================================================================== 2 . 471 |====================================================================== 3 . 470 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 397 |====================================================================== 2 . 396 |====================================================================== 3 . 396 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 553 |====================================================================== 2 . 550 |====================================================================== 3 . 553 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 164 |====================================================================== 2 . 164 |====================================================================== 3 . 164 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 642 |====================================================================== 2 . 642 |====================================================================== 3 . 644 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 201 |====================================================================== 2 . 201 |====================================================================== 3 . 201 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1081 |===================================================================== 2 . 1082 |===================================================================== 3 . 1080 |===================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1148.78 |================================================================== 2 . 1153.83 |================================================================== 3 . 1155.93 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 250.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.51 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 149.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 148.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 149.11 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 240.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 240.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 240.11 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.167 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.145 |==================================================================== 3 . 6.146 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 336.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 337.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 336.05 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 613.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 610.96 |=================================================================== 3 . 614.86 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.30 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 582.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 582.01 |=================================================================== 3 . 582.31 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 248.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.97 |=================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1808.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 1805.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 1803.3 |=================================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 135.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 135.41 |=================================================================== 3 . 132.34 |================================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.258 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.259 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.273 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 40.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 41.00 |==================================================================== 3 . 40.77 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.723 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.713 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.716 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.957 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.979 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.970 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 44.27 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.15 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 328 |====================================================================== 2 . 328 |====================================================================== 3 . 328 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 582 |====================================================================== 2 . 582 |====================================================================== 3 . 582 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 60 |======================================================================= 2 . 60 |======================================================================= 3 . 60 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 10700 |==================================================================== 2 . 10696 |==================================================================== 3 . 10676 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 4352 |===================================================================== 2 . 4334 |===================================================================== 3 . 4347 |===================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 309.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 309.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 311.22 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 296.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 296.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 296.16 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.045 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.063 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.063 |==================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4720.22 |================================================================== 2 . 4729.76 |================================================================== 3 . 4719.69 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 953.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 938.84 |================================================================== 3 . 940.83 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 960.23 |=================================================================== 2 . 933.49 |================================================================= 3 . 959.77 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13022.66 |================================================================ 2 . 13203.92 |================================================================= 3 . 13190.13 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 25421.02 |================================================================= 2 . 25115.18 |================================================================ 3 . 25428.46 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16156.63 |================================================================= 2 . 15664.08 |=============================================================== 3 . 16170.45 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1414.22 |================================================================== 2 . 1415.15 |================================================================== 3 . 1414.53 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1880.56 |================================================================== 2 . 1881.67 |================================================================== 3 . 1881.12 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1711.34 |================================================================== 2 . 1718.82 |================================================================== 3 . 1674.97 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2162.83 |================================================================== 2 . 2174.68 |================================================================== 3 . 2133.39 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1560.99 |================================================================= 2 . 1591.53 |================================================================== 3 . 1595.06 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2295.31 |================================================================== 2 . 2288.77 |================================================================== 3 . 2295.31 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 249.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 249.17 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.17 |=================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 333264500 |================================================================ 2 . 333615967 |================================================================ 3 . 333464900 |================================================================ Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 42778687 |================================================================= 2 . 42986933 |================================================================= 3 . 42728223 |================================================================= LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5187.42 |================================================================== 2 . 5192.27 |================================================================== 3 . 5200.25 |================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 198.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 198.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 198.05 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 37.69 |=================================================================== 3 . 38.07 |==================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2235.80 |================================================================== 2 . 2229.12 |================================================================== 3 . 2237.21 |================================================================== CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1366.24 |================================================================== 2 . 1361.66 |================================================================== 3 . 1359.18 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 446.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 445.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 441.18 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 129.05 |=================================================================== 2 . 128.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 129.26 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 362.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 361.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 356.18 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 66.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.49 |==================================================================== 3 . 66.29 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.294 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.293 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.292 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.859 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.855 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.852 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.130 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.124 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.124 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.484 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.522 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.483 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 197.72 |================================================================== 2 . 199.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 197.97 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 62310.58 |================================================================= 2 . 62205.91 |================================================================= 3 . 62019.24 |================================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2184273.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 1392683.21 |======================================== 3 . 1381617.17 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1735755.75 |============================================================== 2 . 1767770.42 |=============================================================== 3 . 1749575.63 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1331267.79 |============================================================== 2 . 1347316.54 |=============================================================== 3 . 1340317.13 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2117431.17 |=============================================================== 2 . 1929425.96 |========================================================= 3 . 1945558.42 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1612741.71 |=============================================================== 2 . 1564875.57 |============================================================= 3 . 1579700.62 |============================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 74.61 |==================================================================== 2 . 74.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 74.32 |==================================================================== Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.3 |===================================================================== 2 . 21.3 |===================================================================== 3 . 21.3 |===================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 106201.33 |================================================================ 2 . 105922.05 |================================================================ 3 . 105740.31 |================================================================