Xeon E5 Haswell 2021 Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 testing with a ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS) and eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3 @ 3.80GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS X99-A (3902 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v3/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: PNY CS900 240GB, Graphics: eVGA NVIDIA NVE7 1GB, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: nouveau, OpenGL: 4.3 Mesa 20.0.8, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 21.3 |===================================================================== 2 . 21.3 |===================================================================== 3 . 21.3 |===================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1808.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 1805.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 1803.3 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1148.78 |================================================================== 2 . 1153.83 |================================================================== 3 . 1155.93 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 250.28 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.51 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 149.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 148.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 149.11 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 240.45 |=================================================================== 2 . 240.47 |=================================================================== 3 . 240.11 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4720.22 |================================================================== 2 . 4729.76 |================================================================== 3 . 4719.69 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 953.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 938.84 |================================================================== 3 . 940.83 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 960.23 |=================================================================== 2 . 933.49 |================================================================= 3 . 959.77 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13022.66 |================================================================ 2 . 13203.92 |================================================================= 3 . 13190.13 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 25421.02 |================================================================= 2 . 25115.18 |================================================================ 3 . 25428.46 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16156.63 |================================================================= 2 . 15664.08 |=============================================================== 3 . 16170.45 |================================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 135.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 135.41 |=================================================================== 3 . 132.34 |================================================================= CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1366.24 |================================================================== 2 . 1361.66 |================================================================== 3 . 1359.18 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37 |======================================================================= 2 . 37 |======================================================================= 3 . 37 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105 |====================================================================== 2 . 105 |====================================================================== 3 . 105 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 443 |====================================================================== 2 . 441 |====================================================================== 3 . 443 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1511 |==================================================================== 2 . 1518 |===================================================================== 3 . 1525 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 73 |======================================================================= 2 . 73 |======================================================================= 3 . 73 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1572 |==================================================================== 2 . 1587 |===================================================================== 3 . 1578 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 87 |======================================================================= 2 . 87 |======================================================================= 3 . 87 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 470 |====================================================================== 2 . 471 |====================================================================== 3 . 470 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 397 |====================================================================== 2 . 396 |====================================================================== 3 . 396 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 553 |====================================================================== 2 . 550 |====================================================================== 3 . 553 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 164 |====================================================================== 2 . 164 |====================================================================== 3 . 164 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 642 |====================================================================== 2 . 642 |====================================================================== 3 . 644 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 201 |====================================================================== 2 . 201 |====================================================================== 3 . 201 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1081 |===================================================================== 2 . 1082 |===================================================================== 3 . 1080 |===================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 333264500 |================================================================ 2 . 333615967 |================================================================ 3 . 333464900 |================================================================ QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 37.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 37.69 |=================================================================== 3 . 38.07 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 198.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 198.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 198.05 |=================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2235.80 |================================================================== 2 . 2229.12 |================================================================== 3 . 2237.21 |================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.045 |==================================================================== 2 . 5.063 |==================================================================== 3 . 5.063 |==================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5187.42 |================================================================== 2 . 5192.27 |================================================================== 3 . 5200.25 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 446.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 445.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 441.18 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 129.05 |=================================================================== 2 . 128.51 |=================================================================== 3 . 129.26 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 362.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 361.53 |=================================================================== 3 . 356.18 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 66.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 66.49 |==================================================================== 3 . 66.29 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.294 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.293 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.292 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.859 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.855 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.852 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.130 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.124 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.124 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.484 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.522 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.483 |=================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 197.72 |================================================================== 2 . 199.48 |=================================================================== 3 . 197.97 |================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 248.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.66 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.97 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.167 |==================================================================== 2 . 6.145 |==================================================================== 3 . 6.146 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 336.02 |=================================================================== 2 . 337.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 336.05 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 613.03 |=================================================================== 2 . 610.96 |=================================================================== 3 . 614.86 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.29 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.30 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 582.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 582.01 |=================================================================== 3 . 582.31 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 62310.58 |================================================================= 2 . 62205.91 |================================================================= 3 . 62019.24 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 106201.33 |================================================================ 2 . 105922.05 |================================================================ 3 . 105740.31 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1414.22 |================================================================== 2 . 1415.15 |================================================================== 3 . 1414.53 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1880.56 |================================================================== 2 . 1881.67 |================================================================== 3 . 1881.12 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1711.34 |================================================================== 2 . 1718.82 |================================================================== 3 . 1674.97 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 2162.83 |================================================================== 2 . 2174.68 |================================================================== 3 . 2133.39 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1560.99 |================================================================= 2 . 1591.53 |================================================================== 3 . 1595.06 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2295.31 |================================================================== 2 . 2288.77 |================================================================== 3 . 2295.31 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 249.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 249.17 |=================================================================== 3 . 249.17 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1442334 |================================================================== 2 . 1440358 |================================================================== 3 . 1441674 |================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 578472 |=================================================================== 2 . 578049 |=================================================================== 3 . 579110 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1873.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 1882.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 1881.7 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1893.1 |=================================================================== 2 . 1892.6 |=================================================================== 3 . 1890.4 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 601.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 603.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 602.5 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 584.7 |==================================================================== 2 . 584.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 583.3 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 377.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 378.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 378.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 378.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 379.5 |==================================================================== 3 . 378.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1556.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 1557.8 |=================================================================== 3 . 1555.6 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1545.6 |=================================================================== 2 . 1547.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 1544.5 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 603.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 602.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 601.2 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 584.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 584.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 583.4 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 378.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 378.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 378.2 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 378.9 |==================================================================== 2 . 379.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 377.3 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2184273.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 1392683.21 |======================================== 3 . 1381617.17 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1735755.75 |============================================================== 2 . 1767770.42 |=============================================================== 3 . 1749575.63 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1331267.79 |============================================================== 2 . 1347316.54 |=============================================================== 3 . 1340317.13 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2117431.17 |=============================================================== 2 . 1929425.96 |========================================================= 3 . 1945558.42 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1612741.71 |=============================================================== 2 . 1564875.57 |============================================================= 3 . 1579700.62 |============================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.258 |==================================================================== 2 . 7.259 |==================================================================== 3 . 7.273 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 40.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 41.00 |==================================================================== 3 . 40.77 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 3.723 |==================================================================== 2 . 3.713 |==================================================================== 3 . 3.716 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.957 |=================================================================== 2 . 2.979 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.970 |==================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 44.27 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.15 |==================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 309.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 309.84 |=================================================================== 3 . 311.22 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 296.83 |=================================================================== 2 . 296.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 296.16 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 328 |====================================================================== 2 . 328 |====================================================================== 3 . 328 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 582 |====================================================================== 2 . 582 |====================================================================== 3 . 582 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 60 |======================================================================= 2 . 60 |======================================================================= 3 . 60 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 10700 |==================================================================== 2 . 10696 |==================================================================== 3 . 10676 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 4352 |===================================================================== 2 . 4334 |===================================================================== 3 . 4347 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 74.61 |==================================================================== 2 . 74.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 74.32 |==================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 42778687 |================================================================= 2 . 42986933 |================================================================= 3 . 42728223 |=================================================================