ARMv8 32 Cores Ampere eMAG ARMv8 testing with a AmpereComputing OSPREY (4.8.19 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Ampere eMAG ARMv8 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: AmpereComputing OSPREY (4.8.19 BIOS), Chipset: Applied Micro Circuits X-Gene, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-050700-generic (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: aspeed, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Ampere eMAG ARMv8 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: AmpereComputing OSPREY (4.8.19 BIOS), Chipset: Applied Micro Circuits X-Gene, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-050700-generic (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: aspeed, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Ampere eMAG ARMv8 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: AmpereComputing OSPREY (4.8.19 BIOS), Chipset: Applied Micro Circuits X-Gene, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-050700-generic (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: aspeed, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Ampere eMAG ARMv8 @ 3.00GHz (32 Cores), Motherboard: AmpereComputing OSPREY (4.8.19 BIOS), Chipset: Applied Micro Circuits X-Gene, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 256GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: ASPEED, Monitor: VE228, Network: Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.7.0-050700-generic (aarch64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: aspeed, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 299.36 |=================================================================== 2 . 299.49 |=================================================================== 3 . 299.36 |=================================================================== 4 . 299.48 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 33.83 |==================================================================== 2 . 33.85 |==================================================================== 3 . 33.86 |==================================================================== 4 . 33.86 |==================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22.38 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.39 |==================================================================== 3 . 22.39 |==================================================================== 4 . 22.38 |==================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 33.78 |==================================================================== 2 . 33.81 |==================================================================== 3 . 33.82 |==================================================================== 4 . 33.83 |==================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2062.31 |================================================================== 2 . 2043.48 |================================================================= 3 . 2061.27 |================================================================== 4 . 2057.35 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 511.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 511.77 |=================================================================== 3 . 511.59 |=================================================================== 4 . 511.75 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 511.46 |=================================================================== 2 . 511.77 |=================================================================== 3 . 512.18 |=================================================================== 4 . 511.22 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5556.34 |================================================================== 2 . 5564.33 |================================================================== 3 . 5563.41 |================================================================== 4 . 5554.04 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 311.98 |================================================================== 2 . 314.50 |=================================================================== 3 . 313.21 |=================================================================== 4 . 313.47 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3790.58 |================================================================== 2 . 3790.99 |================================================================== 3 . 3783.87 |================================================================== 4 . 3792.06 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5036.96 |================================================================== 2 . 5028.42 |================================================================== 3 . 5041.76 |================================================================== 4 . 5038.22 |================================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 217.81 |=============================================================== 2 . 216.03 |============================================================== 3 . 224.42 |================================================================= 4 . 232.49 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17 |======================================================================= 2 . 17 |======================================================================= 3 . 17 |======================================================================= 4 . 17 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 72 |======================================================================= 2 . 72 |======================================================================= 3 . 72 |======================================================================= 4 . 72 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 189 |===================================================================== 2 . 193 |====================================================================== 3 . 191 |===================================================================== 4 . 193 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 596 |===================================================================== 2 . 604 |====================================================================== 3 . 602 |====================================================================== 4 . 605 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22 |==================================================================== 2 . 23 |======================================================================= 3 . 23 |======================================================================= 4 . 23 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 537 |===================================================================== 2 . 547 |====================================================================== 3 . 547 |====================================================================== 4 . 547 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 28 |======================================================================= 2 . 28 |======================================================================= 3 . 27 |==================================================================== 4 . 28 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 253 |====================================================================== 2 . 253 |====================================================================== 3 . 252 |====================================================================== 4 . 253 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 166 |===================================================================== 2 . 169 |====================================================================== 3 . 168 |====================================================================== 4 . 169 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 265 |===================================================================== 2 . 267 |====================================================================== 3 . 266 |====================================================================== 4 . 267 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 76 |======================================================================= 2 . 76 |======================================================================= 3 . 75 |====================================================================== 4 . 75 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 311 |====================================================================== 2 . 310 |====================================================================== 3 . 307 |===================================================================== 4 . 308 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 70 |======================================================================= 2 . 69 |====================================================================== 3 . 70 |======================================================================= 4 . 70 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 508 |====================================================================== 2 . 506 |====================================================================== 3 . 507 |====================================================================== 4 . 507 |====================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 568964133 |================================================================ 2 . 569399600 |================================================================ 3 . 569584800 |================================================================ 4 . 569326033 |================================================================ QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 91.50 |==================================================================== 2 . 91.35 |==================================================================== 3 . 91.41 |==================================================================== 4 . 91.11 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 127.23 |=================================================================== 2 . 127.39 |=================================================================== 3 . 127.51 |=================================================================== 4 . 127.70 |=================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 4280 |===================================================================== 2 . 4240 |==================================================================== 3 . 4240 |==================================================================== 4 . 4240 |==================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.732 |=================================================================== 2 . 5.705 |=================================================================== 3 . 5.742 |=================================================================== 4 . 5.787 |==================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5679.10 |================================================================== 2 . 5684.94 |================================================================== 3 . 5696.88 |================================================================== 4 . 5701.77 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 86.86 |==================================================================== 2 . 87.03 |==================================================================== 3 . 87.43 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 42.09 |==================================================================== 2 . 42.03 |==================================================================== 3 . 42.11 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 94.96 |==================================================================== 2 . 95.19 |==================================================================== 3 . 95.34 |==================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 59.10 |==================================================================== 2 . 59.28 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.078 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.078 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.078 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.186 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.186 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.186 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.224 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.224 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.224 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.429 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.430 |==================================================================== 4 . 0.430 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 240.61 |=================================================================== 2 . 242.33 |=================================================================== 4 . 241.99 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 515.42 |=================================================================== 2 . 512.10 |=================================================================== 4 . 512.44 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.458 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.513 |==================================================================== 4 . 9.457 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 360.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 359.81 |=================================================================== 4 . 360.26 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 649.41 |=================================================================== 2 . 649.03 |=================================================================== 4 . 650.03 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 18.74 |==================================================================== 2 . 18.79 |==================================================================== 4 . 18.72 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 180.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 180.96 |=================================================================== 4 . 180.33 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 175912.83 |================================================================ 2 . 176496.77 |================================================================ 4 . 176039.05 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 283851.07 |================================================================ 2 . 282255.79 |================================================================ 4 . 281522.67 |=============================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2868.11 |================================================================== 2 . 2862.98 |================================================================== 4 . 2869.07 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3048.74 |================================================================== 2 . 3042.93 |================================================================== 4 . 3052.75 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1645.97 |================================================================== 2 . 1642.54 |================================================================== 4 . 1643.40 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1757.11 |================================================================== 2 . 1753.20 |================================================================== 4 . 1756.13 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2812.84 |================================================================== 2 . 2802.90 |================================================================== 4 . 2773.70 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3157.28 |================================================================= 2 . 3169.71 |================================================================= 4 . 3195.17 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 165.86 |============================================================= 2 . 182.68 |=================================================================== 4 . 175.77 |================================================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 706274 |=================================================================== 2 . 706278 |=================================================================== 4 . 701566 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 244084 |=================================================================== 2 . 244537 |=================================================================== 4 . 243780 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 443.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 450.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 448.2 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 447.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 448.3 |==================================================================== 4 . 447.1 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 60.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 61.8 |===================================================================== 4 . 61.8 |===================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 61.9 |===================================================================== 2 . 61.8 |===================================================================== 4 . 62.0 |===================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 103.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 105.9 |==================================================================== 4 . 106.1 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 104.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 104.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 104.8 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 361.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 362.6 |==================================================================== 4 . 362.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 361.3 |==================================================================== 2 . 362.4 |==================================================================== 4 . 361.9 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 61.7 |===================================================================== 2 . 61.8 |===================================================================== 4 . 61.9 |===================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 105.9 |==================================================================== 2 . 105.8 |==================================================================== 4 . 105.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 104.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 104.4 |==================================================================== 4 . 105.0 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 241264.03 |================================================================ 2 . 224413.21 |============================================================ 4 . 221402.99 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 237915.06 |================================================================ 2 . 233442.45 |=============================================================== 4 . 232857.60 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 231808.25 |================================================================ 2 . 229452.33 |=============================================================== 4 . 229879.79 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 240905.58 |================================================================ 2 . 232094.70 |============================================================== 4 . 232063.53 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 223333.06 |=============================================================== 2 . 226995.93 |================================================================ 4 . 225671.64 |================================================================ TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 983.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 981.88 |=================================================================== 4 . 983.64 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 981.30 |=================================================================== 2 . 960.25 |================================================================== 4 . 964.46 |================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 36 |======================================================================= 2 . 36 |======================================================================= 4 . 36 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 46 |======================================================================= 4 . 45 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 11 |======================================================================= 4 . 11 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 1223 |===================================================================== 4 . 1227 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 644 |====================================================================== 4 . 641 |====================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 120.15 |=================================================================== 4 . 118.64 |================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 47496417 |================================================================= 4 . 47191740 |================================================================= Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 2 . 61.9 |===================================================================== 4 . 62.1 |=====================================================================