broadwell 28 January Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 testing with a MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 @ 1.70GHz (8 Cores), Motherboard: MSI X99A RAIDER (MS-7885) v5.0 (P.50 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v4/Xeon, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 256GB CORSAIR FORCE LX, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I218-V OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200926-generic (x86_64) 20200925, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 196 |====================================================================== 2 . 196 |====================================================================== 3 . 196 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 331 |====================================================================== 2 . 330 |====================================================================== 3 . 330 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 34 |===================================================================== 2 . 34 |===================================================================== 3 . 35 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 7991 |===================================================================== 2 . 7984 |===================================================================== 3 . 7996 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 2306 |===================================================================== 2 . 2310 |===================================================================== 3 . 2303 |===================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 169.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 169.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 169.97 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 85.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 87.21 |==================================================================== 3 . 86.65 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 93.27 |==================================================================== 2 . 93.26 |==================================================================== 3 . 91.83 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2395.34 |================================================================== 2 . 2369.74 |================================================================= 3 . 2377.78 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 603.65 |=================================================================== 2 . 605.90 |=================================================================== 3 . 603.16 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 86207 |==================================================================== 2 . 85697 |=================================================================== 3 . 86437 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 547.56 |=================================================================== 2 . 547.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 548.08 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12113 |==================================================================== 2 . 12003 |=================================================================== 3 . 12087 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3851.40 |================================================================== 2 . 3806.26 |================================================================= 3 . 3841.39 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8094.08 |================================================================== 2 . 8091.68 |================================================================== 3 . 8083.18 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17100 |=================================================================== 2 . 17200 |=================================================================== 3 . 17367 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 22580 |================================================================== 2 . 23147 |==================================================================== 3 . 23197 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17 |======================================================================= 2 . 17 |======================================================================= 3 . 17 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 47 |======================================================================= 2 . 47 |======================================================================= 3 . 47 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 209 |====================================================================== 2 . 209 |====================================================================== 3 . 210 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 712 |====================================================================== 2 . 711 |====================================================================== 3 . 711 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 38 |======================================================================= 2 . 38 |======================================================================= 3 . 38 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 770 |====================================================================== 2 . 770 |====================================================================== 3 . 771 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 47 |======================================================================= 2 . 46 |===================================================================== 3 . 46 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 213 |====================================================================== 2 . 213 |====================================================================== 3 . 213 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 189 |====================================================================== 2 . 190 |====================================================================== 3 . 189 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 261 |====================================================================== 2 . 262 |====================================================================== 3 . 260 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 76 |======================================================================= 2 . 76 |======================================================================= 3 . 76 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 306 |====================================================================== 2 . 305 |====================================================================== 3 . 306 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 90 |======================================================================= 2 . 90 |======================================================================= 3 . 90 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 477 |====================================================================== 2 . 477 |====================================================================== 3 . 477 |====================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1237.44 |================================================================== 2 . 1236.00 |================================================================== 3 . 1237.20 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1543.52 |================================================================== 2 . 1543.89 |================================================================== 3 . 1545.75 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1406.56 |================================================================== 2 . 1404.08 |================================================================== 3 . 1405.24 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1720.26 |================================================================== 2 . 1720.57 |================================================================== 3 . 1717.78 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1185.69 |================================================================== 2 . 1180.50 |================================================================== 3 . 1182.07 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 1606.68 |================================================================== 2 . 1600.74 |================================================================== 3 . 1606.56 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 509.17 |=================================================================== 2 . 504.28 |================================================================== 3 . 509.31 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 114.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 114.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 114.60 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 68.52 |==================================================================== 2 . 68.73 |==================================================================== 3 . 67.99 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 110.16 |=================================================================== 2 . 108.45 |================================================================== 3 . 110.16 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1061036.54 |=============================================================== 2 . 645450.44 |====================================== 3 . 934468.05 |======================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 838765.73 |================================================================ 2 . 839477.06 |================================================================ 3 . 839938.79 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 635582.92 |================================================================ 2 . 630171.44 |=============================================================== 3 . 618876.58 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1002370.23 |=============================================================== 2 . 938833.50 |=========================================================== 3 . 914223.52 |========================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 746030.96 |=============================================================== 2 . 759107.12 |================================================================ 3 . 759141.27 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3514.91 |================================================================== 2 . 3517.88 |================================================================== 3 . 3517.56 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 481.33 |================================================================== 2 . 481.74 |================================================================== 3 . 488.47 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 482.33 |================================================================== 2 . 482.51 |================================================================== 3 . 487.61 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8057.63 |================================================================== 2 . 8062.55 |================================================================== 3 . 8056.37 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16203.28 |================================================================= 2 . 16237.02 |================================================================= 3 . 16219.43 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 12976.41 |================================================================= 2 . 12855.49 |================================================================ 3 . 12970.70 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 111219.80 |================================================================ 2 . 110947.98 |================================================================ 3 . 111490.60 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 206593.95 |================================================================ 2 . 202626.88 |=============================================================== 3 . 202649.71 |=============================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 535.85 |=================================================================== 2 . 537.14 |=================================================================== 3 . 536.06 |=================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Default Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 13.25 |==================================================================== 2 . 13.21 |==================================================================== 3 . 13.24 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 75, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 730.76 |================================================================== 2 . 740.56 |=================================================================== 3 . 727.92 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 95, Compression Effort 7 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1327.84 |================================================================== 2 . 1324.08 |================================================================== 3 . 1321.93 |================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Compression Effort 5 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 36.98 |==================================================================== 2 . 36.95 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.00 |==================================================================== WebP2 Image Encode 20210126 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2521.30 |================================================================== 2 . 2522.27 |================================================================== 3 . 2520.31 |================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 162.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 162.20 |=================================================================== 3 . 162.03 |=================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 72.58 |=================================================================== 2 . 72.10 |=================================================================== 3 . 73.36 |====================================================================