8100 Sunday Intel Core i3-8100 testing with a ASRock Z370M-ITX/ac (P4.10 BIOS) and Intel 8th Gen Core Gaussian Mixture Model 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock Z370M-ITX/ac (P4.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core 4-core Desktop, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 60GB DREVO X1 SSD, Graphics: Intel 8th Gen Core Gaussian Mixture Model 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGW OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock Z370M-ITX/ac (P4.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core 4-core Desktop, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 60GB DREVO X1 SSD, Graphics: Intel 8th Gen Core Gaussian Mixture Model 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGW OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i3-8100 @ 3.60GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: ASRock Z370M-ITX/ac (P4.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 8th Gen Core 4-core Desktop, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 60GB DREVO X1 SSD, Graphics: Intel 8th Gen Core Gaussian Mixture Model 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC892, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Intel I219-V + Intel I211 + Intel Dual Band-AC 3168NGW OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc1daily20200819-generic (x86_64) 20200818, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2078.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2052.5 |================================================================== 3 . 2045.3 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1078.73 |================================================================= 2 . 1088.39 |================================================================== 3 . 1082.70 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 271.42 |=================================================================== 2 . 270.65 |=================================================================== 3 . 271.03 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 154.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 154.63 |=================================================================== 3 . 154.60 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 259.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 259.54 |=================================================================== 3 . 259.61 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15309.08 |================================================================= 2 . 15355.49 |================================================================= 3 . 15346.20 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3796.83 |================================================================== 2 . 3805.69 |================================================================== 3 . 3809.85 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 528.70 |=================================================================== 2 . 527.79 |=================================================================== 3 . 519.70 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 522.30 |================================================================== 2 . 525.32 |================================================================== 3 . 529.79 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8303.11 |================================================================ 2 . 8538.85 |================================================================== 3 . 8398.79 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16154.78 |================================================================= 2 . 16156.70 |================================================================= 3 . 15885.31 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8486.66 |================================================================== 2 . 8499.77 |================================================================== 3 . 8512.95 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 5031.43 |================================================================== 2 . 5045.92 |================================================================== 3 . 5033.86 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 36 |======================================================================= 2 . 35 |===================================================================== 3 . 36 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 95 |======================================================================= 2 . 95 |======================================================================= 3 . 95 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 428 |====================================================================== 2 . 428 |====================================================================== 3 . 427 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1484 |===================================================================== 2 . 1487 |===================================================================== 3 . 1488 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 77 |======================================================================= 2 . 76 |====================================================================== 3 . 77 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1636 |===================================================================== 2 . 1636 |===================================================================== 3 . 1636 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 86 |======================================================================= 2 . 86 |======================================================================= 3 . 86 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 421 |====================================================================== 2 . 422 |====================================================================== 3 . 422 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 383 |====================================================================== 2 . 382 |====================================================================== 3 . 383 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 518 |====================================================================== 2 . 519 |====================================================================== 3 . 518 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 160 |====================================================================== 2 . 160 |====================================================================== 3 . 160 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 597 |====================================================================== 2 . 597 |====================================================================== 3 . 597 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 192 |====================================================================== 2 . 193 |====================================================================== 3 . 192 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 931 |====================================================================== 2 . 931 |====================================================================== 3 . 932 |====================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 30.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 30.94 |=================================================================== 3 . 31.18 |==================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 249.29 |=================================================================== 2 . 250.09 |=================================================================== 3 . 250.67 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 88.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 89.02 |==================================================================== 3 . 88.88 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 101.91 |=================================================================== 2 . 101.79 |=================================================================== 3 . 101.85 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2678.50 |================================================================== 2 . 2677.31 |================================================================== 3 . 2693.01 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 704.60 |=================================================================== 2 . 703.55 |=================================================================== 3 . 703.96 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 113077 |=================================================================== 2 . 113383 |=================================================================== 3 . 113607 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 657.79 |=================================================================== 2 . 657.63 |=================================================================== 3 . 657.20 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14183 |==================================================================== 2 . 13863 |================================================================== 3 . 14007 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4525.65 |================================================================== 2 . 4520.53 |================================================================== 3 . 4541.28 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9779.44 |================================================================== 2 . 9781.44 |================================================================== 3 . 9740.16 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 21547 |==================================================================== 2 . 21550 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 28328 |==================================================================== 2 . 28470 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2368756.42 |=============================================================== 2 . 1508953.79 |======================================== 3 . 1510825.33 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1919397.87 |=============================================================== 2 . 1913726.08 |=============================================================== 3 . 1924693.58 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1478285.38 |=============================================================== 2 . 1467455.84 |=============================================================== 3 . 1474399.87 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2270967.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 2117653.38 |=========================================================== 3 . 2105763.96 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1740309.54 |=============================================================== 2 . 1710738.66 |============================================================== 3 . 1706001.96 |============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 234 |====================================================================== 2 . 234 |====================================================================== 3 . 233 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 365 |====================================================================== 2 . 366 |====================================================================== 3 . 366 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 39 |======================================================================= 2 . 39 |======================================================================= 3 . 39 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 15441 |==================================================================== 2 . 15372 |==================================================================== 3 . 15390 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 2610 |===================================================================== 2 . 2607 |===================================================================== 3 . 2621 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 84.73 |==================================================================== 2 . 85.05 |==================================================================== 3 . 85.07 |====================================================================