AMD EPYC 7F72 2P Linux 5.11 - Perf Governor, "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",136670,141450,138990 "CPUFreq Performance",195660,193910,192690 "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",133.24,133.65,133.23 "CPUFreq Performance",182.28,181.5,182.06 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance",333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333,333.33333333333 "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",48.01,49.41,50.08,50.31 "CPUFreq Performance",61.72,60.06,63.65,66.5,59.7,64.8,59.81,63.93,69.02,60.57,60.58,58.9,61.4,60.82,62.96 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: Tradebeans", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",5416,6075,5796,5353,5685,5946,5113,5215,5706,5487,5538,6277,5282,5282,5638,5617,5881,5456,5575,5478 "CPUFreq Performance",4906,4445,4415,4598,5023,4627,4706,5110,4327,4763,4214,4742,4403,4668,4650,4699,4886,4920,4554,4763 "InfluxDB 1.8.2 - Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",810252.3,815201.7,811126.8 "CPUFreq Performance",955527.9,960640.3,952399.9 "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",316.41,317.77,318.17 "CPUFreq Performance",377.52,355.65,362.76,333.89,373.69,377.42,343.89,365.59,365.15,369.91,368.7,350.59,377.56,377.43,350.18 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: Tradesoap", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",5264,5150,5199,4978 "CPUFreq Performance",4688,4484,4621,4730,4584 "Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",93.372,92.05,93.325 "CPUFreq Performance",85.561,85.138,85.133 "IOR 3.3.0 - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",473.03,479.37,473.36 "CPUFreq Performance",525.92,518.93,507.13 "InfluxDB 1.8.2 - Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1260743.8,1251965,1255627.6 "CPUFreq Performance",1372941.8,1341751.8,1365795.5 "Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 - Input: AUSURF112", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1205.51,1161.16,1148.76,1168.7 "CPUFreq Performance",1310.31,1225.87,1163.48,1288.09,1194.65,1205.36,1316.52,1231.18,1306.11 "AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 - Device Training Score", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",361.66,363.2,362.98,365.41,369.91,364.96,364.08,369.69,364.08,362.1 "CPUFreq Performance",346.02,349.24,380.95,344.63,346.82,343.64,348.43,342.86,345.22,346.42,338.79,345.62,338.22,341.49,342.27 "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",19.99,19.7,19.52 "CPUFreq Performance",20.76,20.9,20.59 "oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.838945,0.851826,0.861782,0.851228,0.842458 "CPUFreq Performance",0.811582,0.797674,0.827684,0.8237,0.8075 "AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 - Device AI Score", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 10", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",3.039,3.058,3.066 "CPUFreq Performance",3.15,3.212,3.17 "ASKAP 2018-11-10 - Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",11933,11944.2,11955.4 "CPUFreq Performance",11230.5,11555.4,11692.9 "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4321.930858,4237.674198,4300.279871 "CPUFreq Performance",4105.932203,4189.616889,4111.008371 "IOR 3.3.0 - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",525.96,517.86,518.33 "CPUFreq Performance",528.99,548.85,541.04 "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 - Model: Rhodopsin Protein", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",23.695,22.998,24.558,25.059,23.929,23.637,23.023,23.962,23.468,23.923,23.649,23.547 "CPUFreq Performance",24.606,23.267,25.702,24.117,24.98,25.113,25.109,24.81,24.483,25.502,25.057,24.254,22.96,24.973,24.646 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4769000,4069000,4747000,4763000,4453000,4465000,4722000,4771000,4628000,4708000,4620000,4567000,4678000 "CPUFreq Performance",4759000,4751000,4776000 "AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 - Device Inference Score", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: LargeRandom", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.36,0.36,0.37 "CPUFreq Performance",0.37,0.37,0.37 "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1219077.88,1192471.25,1240107.12 "CPUFreq Performance",1262339.88,1228211.25,1262466.88 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP Leukocyte", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",51.762,54.027,52.263 "CPUFreq Performance",50.947,51.596,51.328 "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 6", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1.402,1.409,1.412 "CPUFreq Performance",1.447,1.445,1.445 "TNN 0.2.3 - Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",285.31,288.978,295.004 "CPUFreq Performance",296.991,297.178,297.227 "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 5", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1.069,1.068,1.066 "CPUFreq Performance",1.089,1.101,1.095 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",10668.8,10769.5,10559.6 "CPUFreq Performance",10225.2,10368.6,10532.7,10560.5,10364.3 "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",371.29,367.2,372.21,378.07,373.83,363.2,371.98,378.55,366.97 "CPUFreq Performance",368.1,369.69,366.08,363.42,364.96,359.28,363.2,350.88,362.98 "LULESH 2.0.3 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",19977.618,19586.044,19188.038,20140.775,19963.638 "CPUFreq Performance",19090.516,19583.666,19750.988,19501.938,18747.201 "ONNX Runtime 1.6 - Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",182.5,183.5,177.5 "CPUFreq Performance",190,181,184.5 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",7.625,7.578,7.702,7.686 "CPUFreq Performance",7.44,7.566,7.51,7.437 "LeelaChessZero 0.26 - Backend: BLAS", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4359,4131,3981,4111,4024,4119,4047,3965,3811 "CPUFreq Performance",4142,4119,4180 "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1361125.88,1417037.25,1519526,1422682.12,1412270.62,1355752.75,1456876.5,1426741.62,1409249.12,1369518.5,1506477.88,1377794.5,1423893,1466715.25,1484560.5 "CPUFreq Performance",1497912.5,1381801.25,1447005.75,1440922.12,1521606.75,1429388.25,1470616.38,1438651.12,1470630.5,1416052.12,1462016.38,1452231.12,1482804.25 "FFTW 3.3.6 - Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",16653,17001,17392 "CPUFreq Performance",17009,18665,17445,17315,17161,17486,16583,16780,17570 "oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1.55548,1.53388,1.59198,1.53652 "CPUFreq Performance",1.55205,1.56479,1.58788,1.6138 "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",661.594,651.254,652.827 "CPUFreq Performance",661.507,717.257,640.328,651.254,689.513,680.55,655.953,686.436,653.253,638.284,671.456,685.354,632.511,661.419,656.642 "BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1105770,1103740,1099845 "CPUFreq Performance",1112313,1079825,1066904 "oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.535077,0.521136,0.51758,0.514078 "CPUFreq Performance",0.508358,0.531882,0.505912,0.512263 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",11265.7,11297.2,11352 "CPUFreq Performance",11250,11272.7,10929 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: SqueezeNet", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",64357,63071.6,59468.9,65210.3,61122.9,60671.1,60700.8,62348.8,61175.1,62073.8,62359.2,63146.3,64317.3,61963.9,60944 "CPUFreq Performance",63426.1,61137.3,60282.3,60542.9 "FinanceBench 2016-07-25 - Benchmark: Repo OpenMP", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",39912.347656,39675.363281,38632.5625 "CPUFreq Performance",39249.632812,40805.589844,39789.847656 "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",27.381,25.506,25.604,25.554,25.577,25.508,25.489,25.6,25.546 "CPUFreq Performance",27.138,25.178,25.204,25.177,25.292,24.987,25.263,25.309,25.236,25.352 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",72782,72580,72547 "CPUFreq Performance",72235,70743,72292 "oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",2.31107,2.36378,2.32386 "CPUFreq Performance",2.13004,2.30985,2.31755,2.34843,2.28744,2.38193,2.18778,2.33647,2.24036,2.39543,2.39248,2.42646,2.41029,2.11004,2.29543 "FinanceBench 2016-07-25 - Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",56062.761719,56286.113281,57959.484375 "CPUFreq Performance",55460.113281,56098.457031,56724.894531 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Mobilenet Float", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",40162.9,38800.9,39606.6 "CPUFreq Performance",39617,39408.4,40920.2 "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: DLSC", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",8,7.72,7.69 "CPUFreq Performance",7.85,8.06,7.75 "Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 - Test: N-Queens", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",27.039,26.375,26.398 "CPUFreq Performance",26.761,26.933,26.991 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",9734.46,9795.84,9741.21 "CPUFreq Performance",9570.08,9794.98,9589.78 "POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 - Trace Time", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",11.323,11.156,11.421,11.321 "CPUFreq Performance",11.449,11.426,11.438,11.394 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",52.631578947368,55.555555555556,55.555555555556,55.555555555556,55.555555555556 "CPUFreq Performance",55.555555555556,55.555555555556,55.555555555556 "QMCPACK 3.10 - Input: simple-H2O", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",29.112,29.358,29.374 "CPUFreq Performance",29.089,28.929,28.895 "Primesieve 7.4 - 1e12 Prime Number Generation", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.433,4.57,4.564,4.526,4.542,4.538,4.551,4.556 "CPUFreq Performance",4.461,4.475,4.48,4.484,4.527,4.518,4.488,4.482 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception V4", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",808813,812835,810601 "CPUFreq Performance",809516,823546,823600 "Stockfish 12 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",96198105,96350021,98579678 "CPUFreq Performance",97135546,97697549,93413248 "Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Volumetric Caustic", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",5.354,5.29827,5.11866,5.27248,5.31393,5.34593,5.13321 "CPUFreq Performance",5.11351,5.33331,5.56746,5.30244,5.27526,5.50064,5.30906,5.42234,5.18033,5.23671,5.15981,5.29011,5.36277 "SQLite Speedtest 3.30 - Timed Time - Size 1,000", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",70.773,70.335,70.513 "CPUFreq Performance",69.482,69.984,70.182 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP Streamcluster", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",10.271,10.314,10.287,10.449,10.367 "CPUFreq Performance",10.389,10.503,10.409,10.331,10.527 "BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - Computational Test: Dhrystone 2", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",37857878.7,38985060.5,38115080.3 "CPUFreq Performance",38384249.4,37961548.8,39622880.7 "CLOMP 1.2 - Static OMP Speedup", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",47.2,48.7,47.4 "CPUFreq Performance",46.4,47.4,48.3 "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 1", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.374,0.371,0.371 "CPUFreq Performance",0.375,0.375,0.375 "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: Jython", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4743,4846,4629,4946,4741,4762 "CPUFreq Performance",4787,4727,4747,4769,4645,4767 "Tachyon 0.99b6 - Total Time", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",17.9352,18.0887,18.1456 "CPUFreq Performance",18.3122,18.3779,17.9111 "PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",23.51,26.86,25.2,27.36,26.46,26.44,24.16,23.96,24.18,25.38,25.66,24.72,25.28,25.54,26.65 "CPUFreq Performance",25.36,25.55,23.35,26.24,25.47,25.99,25.32,26.66,24.4,25.84,25.62,24.56,23.95,24.32,25.72 "Blender 2.90 - Blend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-Only", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",156.83,157.05,156.6 "CPUFreq Performance",159.73,158.03,156.44 "Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",58.844,59.29,59.397 "CPUFreq Performance",58.569,59.282,58.386 "FFTE 7.0 - N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",190995.73675168,183447.75071051,171422.38416503,183235.26456335,169503.05445526,181664.74666715,165715.78910436,183977.18236125,182365.67450151,181675.18481487,170784.06032197,182115.59055157,176725.76177901,176156.54258203,181287.15123459 "CPUFreq Performance",186280.71252899,168937.65693536,172566.64065607,186035.36234266,183955.06307154,176803.12649426,171525.60272611,186260.45470839,185367.67791003,181404.21889492,186001.01537919,177982.85505066,176715.72246507,174171.2172112,186561.9774134 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",48.86,49.19,48.8 "CPUFreq Performance",48.81,51.35,48.72,48.89,48.66 "PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.58,4.67,4.65 "CPUFreq Performance",4.68,4.71,4.58 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",10523.1,10519,10427.4 "CPUFreq Performance",10374.4,10702.1,10588.9 "Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Water Caustic", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",23.0814,20.6919,20.7146,22.2105,20.7004,20.9609,20.9674,21.0491,22.5774,20.5998,20.5556,20.7668,21.4331,21.3764,22.3076 "CPUFreq Performance",20.9975,21.5154,21.8826 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",33.333333333333,32.258064516129,33.333333333333,32.258064516129,32.258064516129,32.258064516129 "CPUFreq Performance",33.333333333333,32.258064516129,33.333333333333,32.258064516129,32.258064516129,33.333333333333 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",47.47,47.92,47.89 "CPUFreq Performance",48.35,48.16,47.55 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP LavaMD", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",52.23,51.823,52.222 "CPUFreq Performance",52.352,52.361,52.366 "ONNX Runtime 1.6 - Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4277,4127,4227 "CPUFreq Performance",3933,4444.5,4139.5,3763,4401,4260,4188.5,4181.5,3878.5,4500,4419.5,4165.5 "Numpy Benchmark - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",323.05,323.37,322.57 "CPUFreq Performance",324.42,324.94,324.07 "oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.867765,0.856167,0.866686,0.866077,0.864868,0.863787,0.861126 "CPUFreq Performance",0.862828,0.867253,0.868678,0.875274,0.870565,0.862547,0.865671 "OpenFOAM 8 - Input: Motorbike 60M", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",128.2,128.42,128.22 "CPUFreq Performance",128.99,128.75,128.69 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",3847.14,3833.69,3831.26,3814.52,3840.65,3837.17,3836.39,3867.3,3840.34,3866.36 "CPUFreq Performance",3877.8,3843.7,3854.69,3851.6,3851.47,3838.02,3851.55,3870.38,3866.74,3867.31 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: LU.C", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",154746.96,155556.23,153161.9,154041.93 "CPUFreq Performance",153880.34,153434.98,153768.39,153998.55 "LeelaChessZero 0.26 - Backend: Eigen", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4410,4385,4504 "CPUFreq Performance",4500,4440,4409 "Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",208.351,210.327,207.681 "CPUFreq Performance",212.979,207.805,203.345 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Mobilenet Quant", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",40070.1,42901.4,40791.7,41074.3,40906.4,40459.8 "CPUFreq Performance",41600,41006.8,40933.4 "ASTC Encoder 2.0 - Preset: Thorough", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",5.65,5.66,5.64,5.64,5.64 "CPUFreq Performance",5.68,5.68,5.66,5.65,5.67 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",53.637,69.595,68.64,69.52,68.802,69.671,69.174,68.464,69.717,69.475,68.862,69.324,70.237,69.219,69.129 "CPUFreq Performance",59.38,68.995,69.656,68.98,68.951,68.847,69.505,69.671,69.475,68.936,68.758,69.234,68.951,68.625,69.01 "High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",30.9531,30.5745,30.951 "CPUFreq Performance",30.9395,30.9061,30.9325 "Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1447228000,1449618000,1449309000 "CPUFreq Performance",1447270000,1449050000,1436204000 "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",97.729,96.319,95.762 "CPUFreq Performance",96.34,96.34,97.976 "TNN 0.2.3 - Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",274.141,274.228,276.238 "CPUFreq Performance",274.137,273.951,274.202 "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: x25x", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1780.85,1531.96,1532.57,1521.5,1528.53,1487.43,1522.47,1531.79,1534.88,1505.81,1565.09,1496.44,1542.04,1521.91,1523.06 "CPUFreq Performance",1644.91,1526.4,1511.45,1531.25,1517.4,1576.53,1525.01,1538.19,1522.95,1510.17,1534.09,1511.88 "PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",21.2,23.35,22.27,22.48,22.67,22.66,22.12,23.35,23.12,23.22,21.91,22.51,22.03,21.98,22.48 "CPUFreq Performance",23.04,22.48,20.91,22.04,22.46,22.75,21.68,22.63,23.24,22.85,22.8,22.5,22.99,23.39,20.74 "Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 - Primate Phylogeny Analysis", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",81.48,82.217,82.43 "CPUFreq Performance",81.753,82.761,82.268 "ASTC Encoder 2.0 - Preset: Exhaustive", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",40.91,40.98,41.03 "CPUFreq Performance",40.98,41.11,41.11 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: Inception ResNet V2", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",718390,729392,779525,729197,734315,740772,727173,729636,738165 "CPUFreq Performance",733830,740875,739274 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4.3290043290043,4.3290043290043,4.3103448275862 "CPUFreq Performance",4.3290043290043,4.3290043290043,4.3290043290043 "asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",117005181,117646798,118246885 "CPUFreq Performance",114810239,118048392,121062060,115562794 "YafaRay 3.4.1 - Total Time For Sample Scene", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",82.109,90.593,90.901,83.303,91.419,89.967,89.64,84.258,89.303,89.344,83.6,84.784,84.573,89.039,84.305 "CPUFreq Performance",88.683,84.76,84.238,89.062,83.683,89.728,88.855,89.084,84.174,88.497,84.792,89.643,90.176,90.788,83.802 "Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 - Scene: Memorial", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",28.365736459616,28.386752470357,28.470885672312,28.219331935536,28.448611849985,28.459217940691 "CPUFreq Performance",28.872027624756,27.683576718112,28.311769202458,28.385221518269,28.11974512263,28.618444587537 "GnuPG 2.2.27 - 2.7GB Sample File Encryption", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",77.54,76.836,77.16 "CPUFreq Performance",77.891,76.398,76.778 "Swet 1.5.16 - Average", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",690449622,684449025,687542138 "CPUFreq Performance",682276149,683094389,693025789 "Etcpak 0.7 - Configuration: ETC1", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",267.121,267.785,267.854 "CPUFreq Performance",266.883,267.63,266.895 "GPAW 20.1 - Input: Carbon Nanotube", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",59.074,60.168,60.312 "CPUFreq Performance",59.517,59.373,60.381 "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 - Model: 20k Atoms", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",25.009,25.059,25.162 "CPUFreq Performance",25.153,25.045,25.15 "ASKAP 2018-11-10 - Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",7456.41,7447.72,7456.41 "CPUFreq Performance",7430.4,7456.41,7439.05 "TSCP 1.81 - AI Chess Performance", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1114935,1117196,1114935,1112682,1114935,1112682,1117196,1114935,1112682,1110439,1117196,1114935 "CPUFreq Performance",1119467,1114935,1114935,1117196,1114935,1117196,1114935,1117196,1117196,1117196,1117196,1112682 "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Garlicoin", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",11310,9761.89,10060,9820.87,9823.54,9855.9,9824.04,9842.51,9842.62,9810.88,9807.14,9892.22,9776.05,9810.51,10010 "CPUFreq Performance",11980,9808.3,9793.25,9803.55,9812.21,9775.82,9872.98,9819.54,9788.78,9792.46,9805.99,9807.57,9813.31,9827.2 "BRL-CAD 7.30.8 - VGR Performance Metric", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: FLOAT", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",322905080.68681,323310417.95927,323217752.86984 "CPUFreq Performance",322915235.05364,322378619.66579,323031996.68432 "GROMACS 2020.3 - Water Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",5.289,5.218,5.276 "CPUFreq Performance",5.291,5.22,5.254 "Google SynthMark 20201109 - Test: VoiceMark_100", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",714.872,714.996,714.875 "CPUFreq Performance",714.974,715.702,711.866 "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.D", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",3858.03,3864.04,3868.27 "CPUFreq Performance",3870.16,3869.92,3861.81 "Gcrypt Library 1.9 - ", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",231.179,233.992,232.456 "CPUFreq Performance",232.185,232.1,233.994 "Dolfyn 0.527 - Computational Fluid Dynamics", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",18.623,18.709,18.624 "CPUFreq Performance",18.593,18.613,18.699 "Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - Scene: Hair", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",6.68047,6.68115,6.727,6.69578,6.6301,6.72764 "CPUFreq Performance",6.88346,6.49157,6.71858,6.7476,6.78979,6.5393 "Etcpak 0.7 - Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",245.484,245.783,245.519 "CPUFreq Performance",245.354,245.65,245.354 "OpenFOAM 8 - Input: Motorbike 30M", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",18.15,18.42,18.33 "CPUFreq Performance",18.16,18.48,18.23 "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1584073.5,1622849.62,1649898.12,1587836.12 "CPUFreq Performance",1544645,1610306,1705051.75,1530695.25,1539912.5,1652346.38,1526727.25,1620498.5,1686061.62,1647446.38,1516070.25,1622901.62,1612169.62,1605687.88,1736747.5 "QuantLib 1.21 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",2141.7,2159.8,2170 "CPUFreq Performance",2124.7,2176.7,2167.5 "Build2 0.13 - Time To Compile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",66.38,68.169,67.416 "CPUFreq Performance",67.736,66.698,67.567 "RELION 3.1.1 - Test: Basic - Device: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",371.973,344.389,345.429,345.341,345.961,345.569,344.765,346.226,344.996 "CPUFreq Performance",373.089,344.309,346.512,344.967,345.565,345.3,345.798,344.775,344.725 "Etcpak 0.7 - Configuration: ETC2", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",155.832,155.748,155.814 "CPUFreq Performance",155.768,155.748,155.832 "NAMD 2.14 - ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.444632,0.444801,0.444725 "CPUFreq Performance",0.443936,0.44393,0.446194 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.094,0.09,0.087,0.093,0.089,0.093,0.093,0.092,0.089,0.089,0.09,0.09 "CPUFreq Performance",0.092,0.091,0.091 "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.65,0.65,0.65 "CPUFreq Performance",0.64,0.65,0.65 "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: Kostya", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.57,0.57,0.57 "CPUFreq Performance",0.57,0.56,0.57 "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: PartialTweets", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",0.63,0.63,0.63 "CPUFreq Performance",0.63,0.63,0.63 "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",8.59,8.78,8.91 "CPUFreq Performance",8.68,8.77,8.83 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",16.393442622951,16.393442622951,16.393442622951,16.393442622951 "CPUFreq Performance",16.393442622951,16.393442622951,16.393442622951,16.393442622951 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571 "CPUFreq Performance",71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571,71.428571428571 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",5.952380952381,5.952380952381,5.952380952381 "CPUFreq Performance",5.952380952381,5.952380952381,5.952380952381 "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",11.23595505618,11.23595505618,11.111111111111 "CPUFreq Performance",11.23595505618,11.23595505618,11.111111111111 "CPU Power Consumption Monitor - Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring", "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "x265 3.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 4K", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "x265 3.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "x265 3.4 - Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 - Mode: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 - Mode: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",53873,54795,42072,55163,54534,54966,54678,54627,54616,54996,55060,50158,55444 "CPUFreq Performance",54316,54735,55992 "Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Tungsten Renderer 0.2.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TSCP 1.81 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TSCP 1.81 - AI Chess Performance", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - Model: NASNet Mobile", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",132316,140814,106838,128245,138338,137994,136345,143889,130145,128778,135727,146394,136441,129699,138694 "CPUFreq Performance",132101,152016,136746,130254,127755,119861,122714,144885,128818,134132,126605,132134,132909,141327,130410 "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Tachyon 0.99b6 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Swet 1.5.16 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Swet 1.5.16 - Average", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: VMAF Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-VP9 0.1 - Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",266.08,328.77,332.78,330.94,322.58,334.26,326.98,329.13,329.13,328.59,328.05,324.5,326.98,322.41,325.91 "CPUFreq Performance",95.95,328.95,327.33,330.21,324.68,331.67,324.15,326.09,323.62,323.28,324.68,324.85,318.98,320.51,319.15 "SVT-AV1 0.8 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 0 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-AV1 0.8 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-AV1 0.8 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SVT-AV1 0.8 - Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Stockfish 12 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Stockfish 12 - Total Time", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "SQLite Speedtest 3.30 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: DistinctUserID", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: Kostya", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: LargeRandom", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "simdjson 0.7.1 - Throughput Test: PartialTweets", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Rodinia 3.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Rodinia 3.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Rodinia 3.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Rodinia 3.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Rodinia 3.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Rodinia 3.1 - Test: OpenMP CFD Solver", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",8.435,8.633,8.787,9.564,8.437,9.076,8.604,8.47,8.438,8.404,9.603,10.281,9.012,8.704,8.784 "CPUFreq Performance",8.413,8.651,8.62,8.399,8.469 "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b - Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Primesieve 7.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "PlaidML - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "PlaidML - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "PlaidML - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "PlaidML - FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 - Scene: Memorial", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Numpy Benchmark - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Numpy Benchmark - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Nebular Empirical Analysis Tool 2020-02-29 - ", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",24.614,23.192,22.428,27.084,23.08,23.451,23.403,23.881,24.593,29.197,25.193,25.478 "CPUFreq Performance",24.625,23.317,32.568,24.612,24.457,23.999,26.191,24.919,23.815,25.991,23.134,24.214,24.359,24.315 "Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "oneDNN 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "oneDNN 2.0 - Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1118.58,1128.89,1122.5 "CPUFreq Performance",1258.73,1102.05,1277.82,1519.52,1229.76,1183.74,1121.43,1102.97,1155.26,1146.34,1364.85,1283.5,1515.3,1325.61,1125.28 "oneDNN 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "oneDNN 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "oneDNN 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "oneDNN 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "oneDNN 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: Rainbow Colors and Prism", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LuxCoreRender 2.3 - Scene: DLSC", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LeelaChessZero 0.26 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LeelaChessZero 0.26 - Backend: Eigen", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LeelaChessZero 0.26 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LeelaChessZero 0.26 - Backend: BLAS", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "InfluxDB 1.8.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "InfluxDB 1.8.2 - Concurrent Streams: 64 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "InfluxDB 1.8.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "InfluxDB 1.8.2 - Concurrent Streams: 4 - Batch Size: 10000 - Tags: 2,5000,1 - Points Per Series: 10000", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "KeyDB 6.0.16 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "KeyDB 6.0.16 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "KeyDB 6.0.16 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",314258.83,273233.06,290639.55,299093.65,287714.14,292319.02,296528.67,302070.78,303332.08,274255.63,310845.12,300024.68,283705.31,290756.83,294438.2 "CPUFreq Performance",322539.02,272657.95,299423.77,320376.62,333275.99,288238.11,309500.82,331390.23,288761.36,285576.5,321315.21,314675.33,282522.46,280862.26,296454.26 "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: Blowfish", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 - Test: MD5", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 - Test: FLOAT", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Himeno Benchmark 3.0 - Poisson Pressure Solver", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAMD 2.14 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "GROMACS 2020.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "GROMACS 2020.3 - Water Benchmark", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "GPAW 20.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "CLOMP 1.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "CLOMP 1.2 - Static OMP Speedup", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "FFTW 3.3.6 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "FFTW 3.3.6 - Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "FFTE 7.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "FFTE 7.0 - N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "YafaRay 3.4.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "POV-Ray 3.7.0.7 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: Path Tracer", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OSPray 1.8.5 - Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Dolfyn 0.527 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 - Java Test: H2", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",4742,5366,5167,5898,5121,5055,5237,5031,4961,4933,5327,4989,4984,5467,5816,5143,4991,4994,5210,5913 "CPUFreq Performance",4766,4454,5359,4398,4379,4717,4582,4639,4124,5173,4209,4725,4363,4315,4895,4410,4582,4671,4264,4375 "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 - Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Zstd Compression 1.4.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Zstd Compression 1.4.5 - Compression Level: 3", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Zstd Compression 1.4.5 - Compression Level: 3", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",8143.5,8381.1,8286.8 "CPUFreq Performance",8205.9,647.9,8493.8,8539.5,8631.9,8288.8,8607.5,8491.6,8361.8,8374.9,8297.1,8302.3 "BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 - Computational Test: Dhrystone 2", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Build2 0.13 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "BRL-CAD 7.30.8 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "BRL-CAD 7.30.8 - VGR Performance Metric", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "BlogBench 1.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "BlogBench 1.1 - Test: Read", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Blender 2.90 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ASTC Encoder 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ASTC Encoder 2.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "asmFish 2018-07-23 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "asmFish 2018-07-23 - 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ASKAP 2018-11-10 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ASKAP 2018-11-10 - Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 - Device AI Score", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TNN 0.2.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "TNN 0.2.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Google SynthMark 20201109 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Google SynthMark 20201109 - Test: VoiceMark_100", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "RELION 3.1.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SADD", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: LPUSH", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: GET", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",1740357.88,1804728.38,1649625.88,1711449.62,1693490.88,1715276.88,1666688,1720293.12,1674216.62,1715598.5,1736111 "CPUFreq Performance",1755354.75,1781261.12,1727756.75,1835216.75,1715571.12,1676727,1704465,2107939.25,1814235.12,1796622.38,1725984.12,1751938.25 "Redis 6.0.9 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SET", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 1", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 5", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 6", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "rav1e 0.4 - Speed: 10", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "QuantLib 1.21 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "QuantLib 1.21 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "QMCPACK 3.10 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OpenFOAM 8 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "OpenFOAM 8 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ONNX Runtime 1.6 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ONNX Runtime 1.6 - Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ONNX Runtime 1.6 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "ONNX Runtime 1.6 - Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: LU.C", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.D", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 - Test / Class: EP.C", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LULESH 2.0.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LULESH 2.0.3 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 - Model: 20k Atoms", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 - Model: Rhodopsin Protein", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "IOR 3.3.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "IOR 3.3.0 - Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "IOR 3.3.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "IOR 3.3.0 - Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "GnuPG 2.2.27 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Gcrypt Library 1.9 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "FinanceBench 2016-07-25 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "FinanceBench 2016-07-25 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Etcpak 0.7 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Etcpak 0.7 - Configuration: ETC2", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Etcpak 0.7 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Etcpak 0.7 - Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Etcpak 0.7 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Etcpak 0.7 - Configuration: ETC1", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "dav1d 0.8.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "dav1d 0.8.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "dav1d 0.8.1 - Video Input: Summer Nature 4K", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Skeincoin", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Skeincoin", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",303220,369760,370890,366670,364230,369540,371250,370520,368900,366890,377540,368790 "CPUFreq Performance",419180,539720,528720,533900,536510,540350,532660,525370,528730,537910,534380,517950 "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Garlicoin", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: x25x", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil",238900,302170,298250,303410,301790,306290,300660,302410,300820,304910,301750,302580 "CPUFreq Performance",210390,437760,441550,438570,436640,439730,442270,436040,441100,437150,441600,439970 "Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - CPU Power Consumption Monitor", Lower Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance", "Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 - ", Higher Results Are Better "CPUFreq Schedutil", "CPUFreq Performance",