3900XT Mon AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core testing with a MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 GODLIKE (MS-7C34) v1.0 (1.B3 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 56/64 8GB (1630/945MHz), Audio: AMD Vega 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek Device 2600 + Realtek Device 3000 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 165.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 165.85 |=================================================================== 3 . 163.85 |================================================================== 4 . 164.11 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 656.06 |=================================================================== 2 . 658.45 |=================================================================== 3 . 650.47 |================================================================== 4 . 660.96 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 437.02 |================================================================== 2 . 434.50 |================================================================== 3 . 436.52 |================================================================== 4 . 443.08 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11670.00 |================================================================= 2 . 11760.00 |================================================================= 3 . 11643.00 |================================================================ 4 . 11496.20 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2708.29 |================================================================= 2 . 2737.92 |================================================================== 3 . 2724.16 |================================================================== 4 . 2554.69 |============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 424753 |================================================================= 2 . 431572 |================================================================== 3 . 431999 |================================================================== 4 . 436577 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2740.94 |================================================================= 2 . 2738.61 |================================================================= 3 . 2743.31 |================================================================= 4 . 2786.75 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 79968 |==================================================================== 2 . 75588 |================================================================ 3 . 76781 |================================================================= 4 . 77967 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15704 |==================================================================== 2 . 14706 |================================================================ 3 . 14520 |=============================================================== 4 . 14474 |=============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 34423 |================================================================== 2 . 35490 |==================================================================== 3 . 33917 |================================================================= 4 . 35479 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 66104 |=================================================================== 2 . 57327 |========================================================== 3 . 63937 |================================================================= 4 . 66815 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 88850 |================================================================= 2 . 93133 |==================================================================== 3 . 86578 |=============================================================== 4 . 87550 |================================================================ IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 2MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1114.14 |================================================================== 2 . 1010.73 |============================================================ 3 . 1004.43 |============================================================ 4 . 1041.95 |============================================================== IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 4MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 642.36 |=============================================================== 2 . 651.65 |================================================================ 3 . 655.02 |================================================================= 4 . 679.56 |=================================================================== IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 8MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 572.49 |============================================================= 2 . 627.88 |=================================================================== 3 . 475.40 |=================================================== 4 . 459.80 |================================================= IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 16MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 502.00 |=================================================================== 2 . 436.13 |========================================================== 3 . 453.34 |============================================================= 4 . 452.64 |============================================================ IOR 3.3.0 Block Size: 32MB - Disk Target: Default Test Directory MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 495.89 |=================================================================== 2 . 460.44 |============================================================== 3 . 449.38 |============================================================= 4 . 450.46 |============================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45 |======================================================================= 2 . 43 |==================================================================== 3 . 43 |==================================================================== 4 . 44 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 137 |====================================================================== 2 . 130 |================================================================== 3 . 131 |=================================================================== 4 . 133 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 586 |====================================================================== 2 . 567 |==================================================================== 3 . 567 |==================================================================== 4 . 566 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1821 |===================================================================== 2 . 1748 |================================================================== 3 . 1750 |================================================================== 4 . 1749 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 113 |====================================================================== 2 . 111 |===================================================================== 3 . 112 |===================================================================== 4 . 111 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2000 |===================================================================== 2 . 1973 |==================================================================== 3 . 1988 |===================================================================== 4 . 1971 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 124 |====================================================================== 2 . 113 |================================================================ 3 . 113 |================================================================ 4 . 110 |============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 555 |====================================================================== 2 . 540 |==================================================================== 3 . 535 |=================================================================== 4 . 533 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 568 |====================================================================== 2 . 562 |===================================================================== 3 . 556 |===================================================================== 4 . 551 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 661 |====================================================================== 2 . 655 |===================================================================== 3 . 650 |===================================================================== 4 . 644 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 226 |===================================================================== 2 . 226 |===================================================================== 3 . 229 |====================================================================== 4 . 226 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 773 |===================================================================== 2 . 768 |===================================================================== 3 . 781 |====================================================================== 4 . 773 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 282 |====================================================================== 2 . 270 |=================================================================== 3 . 281 |====================================================================== 4 . 272 |==================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2656.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 2628.0 |================================================================== 3 . 2557.1 |================================================================ 4 . 2546.6 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 768.33 |=================================================================== 2 . 765.93 |=================================================================== 3 . 766.60 |=================================================================== 4 . 767.09 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1304.40 |================================================================== 2 . 1305.90 |================================================================== 3 . 1303.41 |================================================================== 4 . 1302.87 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1457.62 |================================================================== 2 . 1460.31 |================================================================== 3 . 1460.31 |================================================================== 4 . 1449.68 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1594.35 |================================================================== 2 . 1603.95 |================================================================== 3 . 1600.75 |================================================================== 4 . 1591.26 |================================================================= ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 7380.45 |================================================================= 2 . 7428.05 |================================================================== 3 . 7380.45 |================================================================= 4 . 7475.66 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 7717.52 |================================================================== 2 . 7717.52 |================================================================== 3 . 7620.44 |================================================================= 4 . 7523.37 |================================================================ Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1444.48 |================================================================== 2 . 1431.38 |================================================================= 3 . 1402.73 |================================================================ 4 . 1379.74 |=============================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 323.10 |=================================================================== 2 . 324.96 |=================================================================== 3 . 319.76 |================================================================== 4 . 315.41 |================================================================= Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 191.53 |=================================================================== 2 . 191.71 |=================================================================== 3 . 184.88 |================================================================= 4 . 184.17 |================================================================ Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 299.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 299.99 |=================================================================== 3 . 292.67 |================================================================= 4 . 288.25 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2646764.17 |=============================================================== 2 . 2053102.01 |================================================= 3 . 1592607.04 |====================================== 4 . 1667545.69 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2198504.75 |=============================================================== 2 . 2144897.75 |============================================================= 3 . 2065240.05 |=========================================================== 4 . 2095075.75 |============================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1639285.39 |=============================================================== 2 . 1611296.08 |============================================================== 3 . 1605401.62 |============================================================== 4 . 1587779.08 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2495306.00 |=============================================================== 2 . 2268725.50 |========================================================= 3 . 2249303.25 |========================================================= 4 . 2315346.74 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1848258.80 |============================================================== 2 . 1864366.86 |=============================================================== 3 . 1845440.12 |============================================================== 4 . 1829013.50 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1125.63 |================================================================== 2 . 1122.34 |================================================================== 3 . 1124.14 |================================================================== 4 . 1120.95 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1113.76 |================================================================== 2 . 1116.27 |================================================================== 3 . 1117.72 |================================================================== 4 . 1115.75 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 25440.71 |================================================================ 2 . 25746.75 |================================================================= 3 . 25770.17 |================================================================= 4 . 25620.07 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 34171.07 |================================================================= 2 . 33975.35 |================================================================= 3 . 34077.46 |================================================================= 4 . 34164.03 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 48900.85 |================================================================= 2 . 49063.67 |================================================================= 3 . 48799.83 |================================================================= 4 . 48943.47 |================================================================= Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.84 |================================================================== 2 . 22.57 |==================================================================== 3 . 21.66 |================================================================= 4 . 22.26 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 189.38 |================================================================= 2 . 194.92 |=================================================================== 3 . 190.74 |================================================================== 4 . 192.55 |================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 64.04 |=================================================================== 2 . 63.86 |=================================================================== 3 . 64.68 |==================================================================== 4 . 63.85 |===================================================================