390)X Sunday AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 312 |====================================================================== 2 . 312 |====================================================================== 3 . 309 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 479 |==================================================================== 2 . 493 |====================================================================== 3 . 492 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 73 |======================================================================= 2 . 73 |======================================================================= 3 . 73 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 13173 |==================================================================== 2 . 13065 |=================================================================== 3 . 13067 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 5036 |==================================================================== 2 . 5068 |==================================================================== 3 . 5120 |===================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 168.45 |============================================================== 2 . 169.02 |============================================================== 3 . 182.82 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 621.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 613.68 |================================================================== 3 . 616.75 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 402.85 |=================================================================== 2 . 394.71 |================================================================== 3 . 397.81 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11695 |================================================================== 2 . 12036 |==================================================================== 3 . 11727 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2631.70 |================================================================== 2 . 2640.27 |================================================================== 3 . 2636.56 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 412783 |================================================================== 2 . 411815 |================================================================== 3 . 418870 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2660.94 |================================================================== 2 . 2664.52 |================================================================== 3 . 2666.98 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 83088 |=============================================================== 2 . 86862 |================================================================= 3 . 90202 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 18499 |==================================================================== 2 . 18100 |================================================================== 3 . 18590 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 35394 |==================================================================== 2 . 35025 |=================================================================== 3 . 34650 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 84847 |================================================================== 2 . 84267 |================================================================= 3 . 87686 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102915 |================================================================== 2 . 83551 |===================================================== 3 . 104747 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 41 |==================================================================== 2 . 41 |==================================================================== 3 . 43 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 128 |==================================================================== 2 . 129 |==================================================================== 3 . 132 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 550 |================================================================== 2 . 567 |==================================================================== 3 . 583 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1684 |================================================================= 2 . 1732 |=================================================================== 3 . 1775 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 106 |=================================================================== 2 . 108 |==================================================================== 3 . 111 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1877 |================================================================= 2 . 1941 |=================================================================== 3 . 1992 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 119 |====================================================================== 2 . 117 |===================================================================== 3 . 115 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 496 |=================================================================== 2 . 491 |================================================================== 3 . 522 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 533 |================================================================== 2 . 545 |==================================================================== 3 . 563 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 621 |=================================================================== 2 . 627 |=================================================================== 3 . 652 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 216 |=================================================================== 2 . 215 |=================================================================== 3 . 226 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 739 |=================================================================== 2 . 735 |=================================================================== 3 . 770 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 265 |====================================================================== 2 . 262 |===================================================================== 3 . 266 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1243 |===================================================================== 2 . 1222 |==================================================================== 3 . 1246 |===================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2632.0 |=================================================================== 2 . 2534.8 |================================================================ 3 . 2647.4 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 768.20 |=================================================================== 2 . 767.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 765.38 |=================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1329.07 |================================================================== 2 . 1323.66 |================================================================== 3 . 1324.94 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1482.32 |================================================= 2 . 1465.64 |================================================ 3 . 2002.23 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1603.99 |========================================================= 2 . 1597.55 |======================================================== 3 . 1870.67 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 7051.52 |================================================================== 2 . 6987.35 |================================================================= 3 . 6999.98 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 7428.05 |================================================================== 2 . 7428.05 |================================================================== 3 . 7359.66 |================================================================= Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1375.77 |================================================================== 2 . 1380.74 |================================================================== 3 . 1373.15 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 309.29 |=================================================================== 2 . 303.04 |================================================================= 3 . 310.86 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 180.41 |=================================================================== 2 . 179.39 |================================================================== 3 . 181.47 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 294.98 |=================================================================== 2 . 294.80 |=================================================================== 3 . 296.25 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2326110.40 |=============================================================== 2 . 1469768.92 |======================================== 3 . 1481787.54 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1908271.40 |============================================================== 2 . 1863996.21 |============================================================ 3 . 1944071.17 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1449115.08 |=============================================================== 2 . 1450086.71 |=============================================================== 3 . 1431668.00 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2227494.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 2041514.48 |========================================================== 3 . 2089924.33 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1663979.09 |============================================================== 2 . 1682444.25 |=============================================================== 3 . 1650762.75 |============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1094.42 |================================================================== 2 . 1088.18 |================================================================== 3 . 1050.83 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1076.16 |================================================================== 2 . 1075.65 |================================================================== 3 . 1074.95 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 24023.03 |================================================================ 2 . 24293.80 |================================================================= 3 . 24339.47 |================================================================= Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 670.38 |================================================================== 2 . 683.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 679.19 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 42031.88 |================================================================= 2 . 42185.29 |================================================================= 3 . 42124.74 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 74792.95 |================================================================= 2 . 74056.32 |================================================================ 3 . 74105.05 |================================================================ Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 203.54 |=================================================================== 2 . 199.44 |================================================================== 3 . 196.19 |================================================================= GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 65.00 |==================================================================== 2 . 63.43 |================================================================== 3 . 65.01 |====================================================================