AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101259-HA-390XSUNDA01
390)X Sunday
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS) and MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
1:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
2:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
3:
Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-Core @ 3.80GHz (12 Cores / 24 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (2203 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 250GB, Graphics: MSI AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1366/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 + Intel-AC 9260
OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-28a202f 2020-12-31 focal-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 479 |====================================================================
2 . 493 |======================================================================
3 . 492 |======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 5036 |====================================================================
2 . 5068 |====================================================================
3 . 5120 |=====================================================================
Gcrypt Library 1.9
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 203.54 |===================================================================
2 . 199.44 |==================================================================
3 . 196.19 |=================================================================
GnuPG 2.2.27
2.7GB Sample File Encryption
Seconds < Lower Is Better
1 . 65.00 |====================================================================
2 . 63.43 |==================================================================
3 . 65.01 |====================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 7428.05 |==================================================================
2 . 7428.05 |==================================================================
3 . 7359.66 |=================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding
Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better
1 . 7051.52 |==================================================================
2 . 6987.35 |=================================================================
3 . 6999.98 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1329.07 |==================================================================
2 . 1323.66 |==================================================================
3 . 1324.94 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 768.20 |===================================================================
2 . 767.74 |===================================================================
3 . 765.38 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Deepcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 11695 |==================================================================
2 . 12036 |====================================================================
3 . 11727 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.D
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1076.16 |==================================================================
2 . 1075.65 |==================================================================
3 . 1074.95 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Skeincoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 83088 |===============================================================
2 . 86862 |=================================================================
3 . 90202 |====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 73 |=======================================================================
2 . 73 |=======================================================================
3 . 73 |=======================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 312 |======================================================================
2 . 312 |======================================================================
3 . 309 |=====================================================================
ONNX Runtime 1.6
Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU
Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better
1 . 13173 |====================================================================
2 . 13065 |===================================================================
3 . 13067 |===================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 74792.95 |=================================================================
2 . 74056.32 |================================================================
3 . 74105.05 |================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 35394 |====================================================================
2 . 35025 |===================================================================
3 . 34650 |===================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: LU.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 24023.03 |================================================================
2 . 24293.80 |=================================================================
3 . 24339.47 |=================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 18499 |====================================================================
2 . 18100 |==================================================================
3 . 18590 |====================================================================
QuantLib 1.21
MFLOPS > Higher Is Better
1 . 2632.0 |===================================================================
2 . 2534.8 |================================================================
3 . 2647.4 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 84847 |==================================================================
2 . 84267 |=================================================================
3 . 87686 |====================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 102915 |==================================================================
2 . 83551 |=====================================================
3 . 104747 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Blake-2 S
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 412783 |==================================================================
2 . 411815 |==================================================================
3 . 418870 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: x25x
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 402.85 |===================================================================
2 . 394.71 |==================================================================
3 . 397.81 |==================================================================
FinanceBench 2016-07-25
Benchmark: Repo OpenMP
ms < Lower Is Better
1 . 42031.88 |=================================================================
2 . 42185.29 |=================================================================
3 . 42124.74 |=================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC2
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 180.41 |===================================================================
2 . 179.39 |==================================================================
3 . 181.47 |===================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 128 |====================================================================
2 . 129 |====================================================================
3 . 132 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 41 |====================================================================
2 . 41 |====================================================================
3 . 43 |=======================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1663979.09 |==============================================================
2 . 1682444.25 |===============================================================
3 . 1650762.75 |==============================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1684 |=================================================================
2 . 1732 |===================================================================
3 . 1775 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 550 |==================================================================
2 . 567 |====================================================================
3 . 583 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1877 |=================================================================
2 . 1941 |===================================================================
3 . 1992 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 106 |===================================================================
2 . 108 |====================================================================
3 . 111 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 739 |===================================================================
2 . 735 |===================================================================
3 . 770 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 216 |===================================================================
2 . 215 |===================================================================
3 . 226 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 621 |===================================================================
2 . 627 |===================================================================
3 . 652 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 533 |==================================================================
2 . 545 |====================================================================
3 . 563 |======================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Garlicoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2660.94 |==================================================================
2 . 2664.52 |==================================================================
3 . 2666.98 |==================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Magi
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 621.07 |===================================================================
2 . 613.68 |==================================================================
3 . 616.75 |===================================================================
Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5
Algorithm: Ringcoin
kH/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 2631.70 |==================================================================
2 . 2640.27 |==================================================================
3 . 2636.56 |==================================================================
Google SynthMark 20201109
Test: VoiceMark_100
Voices > Higher Is Better
1 . 670.38 |==================================================================
2 . 683.00 |===================================================================
3 . 679.19 |===================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 496 |===================================================================
2 . 491 |==================================================================
3 . 522 |======================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 119 |======================================================================
2 . 117 |=====================================================================
3 . 115 |====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1243 |=====================================================================
2 . 1222 |====================================================================
3 . 1246 |=====================================================================
lzbench 1.8
Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression
MB/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 265 |======================================================================
2 . 262 |=====================================================================
3 . 266 |======================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: GET
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2227494.92 |===============================================================
2 . 2041514.48 |==========================================================
3 . 2089924.33 |===========================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPOP
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 2326110.40 |===============================================================
2 . 1469768.92 |========================================
3 . 1481787.54 |========================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: LPUSH
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1449115.08 |===============================================================
2 . 1450086.71 |===============================================================
3 . 1431668.00 |==============================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: Hogbom Clean OpenMP
Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 168.45 |==============================================================
2 . 169.02 |==============================================================
3 . 182.82 |===================================================================
Redis 6.0.9
Test: SADD
Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1908271.40 |==============================================================
2 . 1863996.21 |============================================================
3 . 1944071.17 |===============================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 294.98 |===================================================================
2 . 294.80 |===================================================================
3 . 296.25 |===================================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: ETC1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 309.29 |===================================================================
2 . 303.04 |=================================================================
3 . 310.86 |===================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1603.99 |=========================================================
2 . 1597.55 |========================================================
3 . 1870.67 |==================================================================
ASKAP 1.0
Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding
Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better
1 . 1482.32 |=================================================
2 . 1465.64 |================================================
3 . 2002.23 |==================================================================
NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4
Test / Class: EP.C
Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1094.42 |==================================================================
2 . 1088.18 |==================================================================
3 . 1050.83 |===============================================================
Etcpak 0.7
Configuration: DXT1
Mpx/s > Higher Is Better
1 . 1375.77 |==================================================================
2 . 1380.74 |==================================================================
3 . 1373.15 |==================================================================