EPYC 7601 1P AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core testing with a TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD EPYC 7601 32-Core @ 2.20GHz (32 Cores / 64 Threads), Motherboard: TYAN B8026T70AE24HR (V1.02.B10 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 126GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5720 2-port PCIe OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-58-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 1782.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 1785.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 1785.1 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1324.82 |================================================================== 2 . 1322.54 |================================================================== 3 . 1323.66 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 184.76 |=================================================================== 2 . 184.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 184.74 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 118.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 118.05 |=================================================================== 3 . 118.01 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 174.31 |=================================================================== 2 . 174.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 174.27 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16965.85 |================================================================= 2 . 16877.73 |================================================================= 3 . 16878.90 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1372.34 |================================================================== 2 . 1373.53 |================================================================== 3 . 1371.11 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1371.50 |================================================================== 2 . 1371.75 |================================================================== 3 . 1369.53 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 41170.52 |================================================================ 2 . 41776.37 |================================================================= 3 . 41560.81 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1288.41 |================================================================== 2 . 1283.86 |================================================================== 3 . 1282.78 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 73405.43 |================================================================= 2 . 73256.12 |================================================================= 3 . 73360.32 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 41103.78 |================================================================ 2 . 41406.62 |================================================================= 3 . 41725.63 |================================================================= CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 32.92 |==================================================================== 2 . 32.00 |================================================================== 3 . 33.08 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 27 |======================================================================= 2 . 27 |======================================================================= 3 . 27 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 83 |====================================================================== 2 . 84 |======================================================================= 3 . 84 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 405 |====================================================================== 2 . 403 |===================================================================== 3 . 406 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1203 |===================================================================== 2 . 1203 |===================================================================== 3 . 1205 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 74 |======================================================================= 2 . 74 |======================================================================= 3 . 73 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1344 |==================================================================== 2 . 1354 |===================================================================== 3 . 1346 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 71 |=================================================================== 2 . 75 |======================================================================= 3 . 73 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 347 |====================================================================== 2 . 348 |====================================================================== 3 . 349 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 368 |===================================================================== 2 . 368 |===================================================================== 3 . 371 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 432 |====================================================================== 2 . 432 |====================================================================== 3 . 432 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 150 |====================================================================== 2 . 151 |====================================================================== 3 . 151 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 504 |====================================================================== 2 . 505 |====================================================================== 3 . 503 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 183 |====================================================================== 2 . 184 |====================================================================== 3 . 181 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 894 |===================================================================== 2 . 902 |====================================================================== 3 . 894 |===================================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better 1 . 849591100 |================================================================ 2 . 847575733 |================================================================ 3 . 828037633 |============================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 43.73 |============================================================ 2 . 43.69 |============================================================ 3 . 49.38 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 30M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 42.20 |=================================================================== 2 . 42.59 |==================================================================== 3 . 42.52 |==================================================================== OpenFOAM 8 Input: Motorbike 60M Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 330.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 330.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 331.04 |=================================================================== Quantum ESPRESSO 6.7 Input: AUSURF112 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1983.48 |================================================================= 2 . 1979.01 |================================================================= 3 . 2002.82 |================================================================== LULESH 2.0.3 z/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13536.96 |============================================================= 2 . 14445.56 |================================================================= 3 . 14460.57 |================================================================= dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 382.43 |================================================================== 2 . 385.23 |=================================================================== 3 . 385.43 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 177.53 |=================================================================== 2 . 178.42 |=================================================================== 3 . 177.44 |=================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 402.86 |================================================================== 2 . 407.74 |=================================================================== 3 . 404.38 |================================================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 90.90 |==================================================================== 2 . 91.06 |==================================================================== 3 . 90.99 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.264 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.262 |=================================================================== 3 . 0.261 |=================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.784 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.782 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.780 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.031 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.023 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.026 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.306 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.305 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.291 |==================================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 94.32 |==================================================================== 2 . 94.89 |==================================================================== 3 . 94.46 |==================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 287.99 |=================================================================== 2 . 287.02 |================================================================== 3 . 290.02 |=================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 512.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 512.08 |=================================================================== 3 . 512.07 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 885.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 884.41 |=================================================================== 3 . 885.83 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 611.10 |================================================================== 2 . 622.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 614.97 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13656 |==================================================================== 2 . 13676 |==================================================================== 3 . 13675 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2942.86 |================================================================== 2 . 2940.41 |================================================================== 3 . 2895.89 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 300977 |=================================================================== 2 . 297184 |================================================================== 3 . 301550 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3568.80 |================================================================== 2 . 3570.81 |================================================================== 3 . 3566.01 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 87560 |==================================================================== 2 . 86710 |=================================================================== 3 . 87403 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8254.50 |================================================================== 2 . 8259.62 |================================================================== 3 . 8233.31 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 34050 |=================================================================== 2 . 33653 |=================================================================== 3 . 34318 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102275 |================================================================== 2 . 99320 |================================================================ 3 . 103261 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 128363 |================================================================== 2 . 131067 |=================================================================== 3 . 126447 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 67976.98 |================================================================ 2 . 68278.38 |================================================================= 3 . 68716.48 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 121717.09 |=============================================================== 2 . 123559.10 |================================================================ 3 . 122119.20 |=============================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1178623 |================================================================== 2 . 1182662 |================================================================== 3 . 1183981 |================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool Iterations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 514008 |=================================================================== 2 . 512334 |=================================================================== 3 . 512336 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1450.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 1453.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 1455.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 1457.1 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1458.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 1457.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 1457.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 1459.8 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 308.5 |==================================================================== 2 . 309.6 |==================================================================== 3 . 309.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 307.1 |==================================================================== 2 . 306.0 |==================================================================== 3 . 307.2 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 317.4 |==================================================================== 2 . 318.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 318.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 318.6 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 256b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 317.8 |==================================================================== 2 . 318.1 |==================================================================== 3 . 318.0 |==================================================================== 3 . 317.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1290.2 |=================================================================== 2 . 1287.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 1290.7 |=================================================================== 3 . 1291.6 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup AES-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1289.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 1286.4 |=================================================================== 3 . 1289.5 |=================================================================== 3 . 1290.2 |=================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 309.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 309.7 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Encryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 318.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 318.8 |==================================================================== 3 . 318.7 |==================================================================== 3 . 318.4 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Twofish-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 317.6 |==================================================================== 2 . 317.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 317.9 |==================================================================== 3 . 317.5 |==================================================================== Cryptsetup Serpent-XTS 512b Decryption MiB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 307.2 |==================================================================== 2 . 307.3 |==================================================================== 3 . 307.1 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1388191.15 |=============================================================== 2 . 873606.23 |======================================== 3 . 867491.15 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1135677.85 |=============================================================== 2 . 1139686.88 |=============================================================== 3 . 1131243.21 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 832369.19 |================================================================ 2 . 824141.50 |=============================================================== 3 . 824028.23 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1335122.72 |=============================================================== 2 . 1263657.29 |============================================================ 3 . 1267015.75 |============================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 980471.00 |============================================================= 2 . 1017686.39 |=============================================================== 3 . 988831.54 |============================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 10.24 |==================================================================== 2 . 10.16 |=================================================================== 3 . 10.10 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: resnet-v2-50 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 41.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 41.67 |==================================================================== 3 . 41.13 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: MobileNetV2_224 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 6.705 |=================================================================== 2 . 6.832 |==================================================================== 3 . 6.716 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: mobilenet-v1-1.0 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.512 |================================================================= 2 . 4.696 |==================================================================== 3 . 4.636 |=================================================================== Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 52.62 |=================================================================== 2 . 53.27 |==================================================================== 3 . 52.66 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 368.14 |=================================================================== 2 . 367.92 |=================================================================== 3 . 369.94 |=================================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 339.01 |=================================================================== 2 . 340.01 |=================================================================== 3 . 339.90 |=================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 164 |===================================================================== 2 . 166 |====================================================================== 3 . 164 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 192 |=================================================================== 2 . 199 |===================================================================== 3 . 201 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 50 |======================================================================= 2 . 50 |======================================================================= 3 . 49 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 4972 |==================================================================== 2 . 5075 |===================================================================== 3 . 4991 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 1735 |===================================================================== 2 . 1687 |=================================================================== 3 . 1689 |=================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 94.07 |=================================================================== 2 . 93.77 |=================================================================== 3 . 94.92 |==================================================================== Unpacking Firefox 84.0 Extracting: firefox-84.0.source.tar.xz Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.89 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.84 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.99 |==================================================================== Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better 1 . 40533015 |================================================================= 2 . 39914088 |================================================================ 3 . 37632138 |============================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2000.95 |================================================================== 2 . 1926.02 |================================================================ 3 . 1805.86 |============================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 4536.07 |================================================================ 2 . 4605.52 |================================================================= 3 . 4699.95 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Degridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 7306.23 |================================================================== 2 . 7339.74 |================================================================== 3 . 7339.98 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve MPI - Gridding Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 6400.05 |================================================================== 2 . 6399.89 |================================================================== 3 . 6386.96 |================================================================== ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 869.20 |============================================================== 2 . 931.91 |=================================================================== 3 . 886.62 |================================================================ ASKAP 1.0 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1916.58 |=========================================================== 2 . 2158.32 |================================================================== 3 . 1574.84 |================================================ Cryptsetup PBKDF2-sha512 MiB/s > Higher Is Better 3 . 1184446 |================================================================== Cryptsetup PBKDF2-whirlpool MiB/s > Higher Is Better 3 . 512001 |===================================================================