AMD Ryzen 9 5950X Linux 5.11 Schedutil vs. Performance Benchmarks by Michael Larabel. Linux 5.11 Git with freq invariance patch. Comparing CPUFreq schedutil and performance governor in various benchmarks. CPUFreq Schedutil: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (3202 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2000GB Corsair Force MP600 + 2000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2100/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch (x86_64) 20210121, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-f01bca8 2021-01-08 groovy-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.164, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 CPUFreq Performance: Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core @ 3.40GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS ROG CROSSHAIR VIII HERO (WI-FI) (3202 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2000GB Corsair Force MP600 + 2000GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM/5600 XT / 5700/5700 8GB (2100/875MHz), Audio: AMD Navi 10 HDMI Audio, Monitor: ASUS MG28U, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel I211 + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc4-max-boost-inv-patch (x86_64) 20210121, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.0.0-devel (git-f01bca8 2021-01-08 groovy-oibaf-ppa) (LLVM 11.0.1), Vulkan: 1.2.164, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 C-Blosc 2.0 Beta 5 Compressor: blosclz MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 14457.3 |============================================= CPUFreq Performance . 15423.4 |================================================ High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.24824 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 4.25755 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 23612.83 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 24115.42 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6901.24 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 7034.54 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1902.47 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1893.04 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12056.39 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12156.39 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 650.14 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 642.74 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27470.50 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 28180.65 |=============================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 9812.73 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 9940.53 |================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 7646.91 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 7899.90 |================================================ LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: BLAS Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 390 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 407 |==================================================== LeelaChessZero 0.26 Backend: Eigen Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 392 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 407 |==================================================== CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 136.24 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 134.95 |================================================= CP2K Molecular Dynamics 8.1 Fayalite-FIST Data Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 888.22 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 811.11 |============================================= CLOMP 1.2 Static OMP Speedup Speedup > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 21.3 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 20.6 |================================================= NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.08745 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1.07820 |================================================ Dolfyn 0.527 Computational Fluid Dynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 13.05 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12.99 |================================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark 1.2 Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 209237533 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 210254267 |============================================== FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 34673.88 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 34946.48 |=============================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 62.99 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 62.88 |================================================== Incompact3D 2020-09-17 Input: Cylinder Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 182.90 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 181.77 |================================================= Timed MAFFT Alignment 7.471 Multiple Sequence Alignment - LSU RNA Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 7.413 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 7.293 |================================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.41 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.43 |=================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.96 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 13.14 |================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27.17 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 27.15 |================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Jython msec < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2948 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2892 |================================================== DaCapo Benchmark 9.12-MR1 Java Test: Tradebeans msec < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3460 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2257 |================================= Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Apache Spark ALS ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1395.65 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1376.54 |=============================================== Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Twitter HTTP Requests ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1890.03 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1917.98 |================================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: In-Memory Database Shootout ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2850.40 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 2597.43 |============================================ Renaissance 0.10.0 Test: Akka Unbalanced Cobwebbed Tree ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 9117.36 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 9263.47 |================================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 70.13 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 70.20 |================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 13130.5 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 13288.2 |================================================ LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 68.39 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 67.86 |================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 13094.6 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 13219.4 |================================================ Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4798.3 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 4850.6 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 43.4 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 43.4 |=================================================== LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 54.11 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 54.09 |================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11356738 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 11372647 |=============================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 38256 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 38311 |================================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2217000 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 2220333 |================================================ oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3.89227 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 3.80695 |=============================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.40829 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 8.14337 |============================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 16.99 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 17.10 |================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2.43083 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 2.42349 |================================================ oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3.54069 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 3.53364 |================================================ oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2657.20 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 2547.96 |============================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1686.63 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1642.32 |=============================================== dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 900.42 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 911.11 |================================================= dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 238.79 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 236.98 |================================================= dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 924.64 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 929.05 |================================================= dav1d 0.8.1 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 135.62 |==================================== CPUFreq Performance . 186.60 |================================================= OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 30.01 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 30.01 |================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.49 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.50 |=================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: San Miguel - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2.47 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2.46 |=================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 40 |===================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 40 |===================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: XFrog Forest - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2.94 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2.94 |=================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: Magnetic Reconnection - Renderer: SciVis FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 21.74 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 22.06 |================================================== OSPray 1.8.5 Demo: NASA Streamlines - Renderer: Path Tracer FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.26 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 8.22 |=================================================== TTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3b Phong Rendering With Soft-Shadow Mapping FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1037.51 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1042.10 |================================================ AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 30.59 |============================================= CPUFreq Performance . 34.21 |================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 57.52 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 61.53 |================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 24.29 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 24.16 |================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Crown Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 23.85 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 23.80 |================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 24.81 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 25.00 |================================================== Embree 3.9.0 Binary: Pathtracer ISPC - Model: Asian Dragon Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 25.66 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 25.36 |================================================= Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 29.35 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 29.35 |================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 53.40 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 53.31 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 4 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6.094 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 6.150 |================================================== SVT-AV1 0.8 Encoder Mode: Enc Mode 8 - Input: 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 51.97 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 52.25 |================================================== SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: PSNR/SSIM Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 228.67 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 232.78 |================================================= SVT-VP9 0.1 Tuning: Visual Quality Optimized - Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 222.17 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 225.68 |================================================= x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 208.87 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 210.86 |================================================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 28.07 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 28.01 |================================================== ACES DGEMM 1.0 Sustained Floating-Point Rate GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 9.415304 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 9.659001 |=============================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 813873.28 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 816060.57 |============================================== Himeno Benchmark 3.0 Poisson Pressure Solver MFLOPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5309.46 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 5273.76 |================================================ 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 95640 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 95168 |================================================== Stockfish 12 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 43755897 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 42818829 |============================================== asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 59991962 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 60379803 |=============================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1113589473 |============================================= CPUFreq Performance . 1094881524 |============================================ libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 8 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.277 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.239 |================================================== libavif avifenc 0.7.3 Encoder Speed: 10 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.094 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.074 |================================================== Timed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 9.1 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 62.62 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 62.11 |================================================== Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 79.57 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 79.29 |================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 45.90 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 45.12 |================================================= Build2 0.13 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 81.57 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 81.37 |================================================== C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 30.87 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 30.90 |================================================== Primesieve 7.4 1e12 Prime Number Generation Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.15 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 11.11 |================================================== Smallpt 1.0 Global Illumination Renderer; 128 Samples Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.924 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.928 |================================================== YafaRay 3.4.1 Total Time For Sample Scene Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 66.58 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 66.67 |================================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 22.99 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 23.10 |================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 61.77 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 55.68 |============================================= FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6.332 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 6.349 |================================================== Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: SMP Parallel Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 141.30 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 140.21 |================================================= RNNoise 2020-06-28 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 15.34 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 15.38 |================================================== Tachyon 0.99b6 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 44.44 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 44.32 |================================================== Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 74981.02 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 75278.80 |=============================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27738.29 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 27852.00 |=============================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 39803.78 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 39899.16 |=============================================== GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.260 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1.265 |================================================== TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: SqueezeNet Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 95054.4 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 95103.9 |================================================ TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception V4 Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1352833 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1351330 |================================================ TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: NASNet Mobile Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 103996 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 104235 |================================================= TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Float Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 62792.5 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 62771.6 |================================================ TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Mobilenet Quant Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 68077.2 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 67985.1 |================================================ TensorFlow Lite 2020-08-23 Model: Inception ResNet V2 Microseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1217200 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1215293 |================================================ ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 100.62 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 100.59 |================================================= GEGL Operation: Scale Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.520 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.458 |================================================= GEGL Operation: Color Enhance Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 40.86 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 41.09 |================================================== GEGL Operation: Rotate 90 Degrees Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 29.51 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 29.63 |================================================== GIMP 2.10.18 Test: resize Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.434 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.261 |================================================ GIMP 2.10.18 Test: rotate Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.454 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 8.170 |================================================ GIMP 2.10.18 Test: auto-levels Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 9.542 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 9.239 |================================================ GIMP 2.10.18 Test: unsharp-mask Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.12 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 11.81 |================================================= Hugin Panorama Photo Assistant + Stitching Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 34.08 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 34.02 |================================================== OCRMyPDF 10.3.1+dfsg Processing 60 Page PDF Document Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.47 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12.42 |================================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Crypto Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4838.18 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 4840.50 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Cache Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 38.12 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 36.77 |================================================ Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: CPU Stress Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12206.42 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12390.16 |=============================================== Stress-NG 0.11.07 Test: Vector Math Bogo Ops/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 172877.32 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 173101.00 |============================================== GPAW 20.1 Input: Carbon Nanotube Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 326.38 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 325.01 |================================================= Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: SqueezeNetV1.0 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.285 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.082 |================================================ Mobile Neural Network 1.1.1 Model: inception-v3 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 31.56 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 30.65 |================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: mobilenet ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 12.20 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 12.12 |================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU-v2-v2 - Model: mobilenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.46 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.47 |=================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU-v3-v3 - Model: mobilenet-v3 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.16 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.16 |=================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: shufflenet-v2 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.44 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.40 |=================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: mnasnet ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.00 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 3.96 |================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: efficientnet-b0 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.40 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.36 |=================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: blazeface ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.83 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1.81 |================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: googlenet ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 13.24 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 13.02 |================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: vgg16 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 60.14 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 59.08 |================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: resnet18 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 14.76 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 14.54 |================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: alexnet ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.37 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 11.01 |================================================ NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: resnet50 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 25.45 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 24.90 |================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: yolov4-tiny ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 21.72 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 21.28 |================================================= NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: squeezenet_ssd ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 14.70 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 14.58 |================================================== NCNN 20201218 Target: CPU - Model: regnety_400m ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17.74 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 17.75 |================================================== TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: MobileNet v2 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 214.93 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 215.80 |================================================= TNN 0.2.3 Target: CPU - Model: SqueezeNet v1.1 ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 209.49 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 213.34 |================================================= PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG16 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 20.92 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 21.40 |================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: VGG19 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 17.38 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 17.58 |================================================== PlaidML FP16: No - Mode: Inference - Network: ResNet 50 - Device: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 11.46 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 11.70 |================================================== Chaos Group V-RAY 4.10.07 Mode: CPU Ksamples > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 32508 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 32451 |================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4.142 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.132 |================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 8.674 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 8.659 |================================================== Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Emily Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 190.54 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 189.42 |================================================= Appleseed 2.0 Beta Scene: Material Tester Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 112.25 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 112.49 |================================================= AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Inference Score Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1544 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1513 |================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device Training Score Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1199 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 1183 |================================================== AI Benchmark Alpha 0.1.2 Device AI Score Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2743 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2696 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 44.80 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 42.85 |================================================ Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 903.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 897.2 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Firefox Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 115 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 128 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Firefox Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 91.87 |============================================= CPUFreq Performance . 100.84 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Firefox Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 125 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 126 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: ARES-6 - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 14.47 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 13.59 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: Kraken - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 555.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 537.9 |================================================ Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Firefox Score < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2826 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2783 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: StyleBench - Browser: Google Chrome Runs / Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 55.2 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 56.0 |=================================================== Selenium Benchmark: Jetstream 2 - Browser: Google Chrome Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 196.48 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 210.00 |================================================= Selenium Benchmark: Speedometer - Browser: Google Chrome Runs Per Minute > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 179 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 189 |==================================================== Selenium Benchmark: PSPDFKit WASM - Browser: Google Chrome Score < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3061 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2822 |=============================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 24.2 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 23.9 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Firefox ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 302.9 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 300.1 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM imageConvolute - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 24.67 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 24.65 |================================================== Selenium Benchmark: WASM collisionDetection - Browser: Google Chrome ms < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 253.02 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 251.73 |================================================= Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 38.03 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 37.74 |================================================== Tesseract OCR 4.1.1 Time To OCR 7 Images Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 18.82 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 18.54 |================================================= Kripke 1.2.4 Throughput FoM > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 73934070 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 72531025 |============================================== Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 691.12 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 694.84 |================================================= Tesseract 2014-05-12 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 426.41 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 426.69 |================================================= Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 241.4 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 242.1 |================================================== Unigine Superposition 1.0 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Quality: Low - Renderer: OpenGL Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 96.4 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 96.4 |=================================================== Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 1920 x 1080 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 957.9 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 961.1 |================================================== Warsow 2.5 Beta Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 432.7 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 431.3 |================================================== Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Low Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 675.27 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 671.34 |================================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: High Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 540.74 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 544.61 |================================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultra Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 472.04 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 475.24 |================================================= Xonotic 0.8.2 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: Ultimate Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 376.94 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 381.16 |================================================= GLmark2 2020.04 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2873 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2875 |=================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: GiMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 10870 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 10861 |================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Plot3D - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 68923 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 68498 |================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Furmark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4620 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4611 |=================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: TessMark - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 19597 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 19608 |================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Triangle - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 424552 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 426719 |================================================= GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Piano - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 846 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 846 |==================================================== GpuTest 0.7.0 Test: Pixmark Volplosion - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen Points > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2091 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 2094 |=================================================== VKMark 2020-05-21 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 VKMark Score > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 640 |==================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 641 |==================================================== ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 246.30 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 254.66 |================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiVoxels / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3940.78 |============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4074.54 |================================================ ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 197.32 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 197.16 |================================================= ParaView 5.4.1 Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 MiPolys / Sec > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2056.32 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 2054.67 |================================================ rav1e 0.4 Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 0.555 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 0.557 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1.631 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 1.660 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 2.191 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 2.225 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.060 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.105 |================================================== Rust Mandelbrot Time To Complete Serial/Parallel Mandelbrot Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 31.61 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 32.12 |================================================== Rust Prime Benchmark Prime Number Test To 200,000,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5.182 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5.172 |================================================== AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 27.37 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 27.25 |================================================== FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 6.453 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4.227 |================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 867.39 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 863.90 |================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 623.19 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 620.60 |================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 5232.85 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 5310.16 |================================================ Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 15.23 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 15.69 |================================================== ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MT - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 915.04 |================================================= CPUFreq Performance . 917.73 |================================================= ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve MT - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 1884.49 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 1896.75 |================================================ ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Gridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3430.62 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 3371.42 |=============================================== ASKAP 2018-11-10 Test: tConvolve OpenMP - Degridding Million Grid Points Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 4204.55 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 4271.73 |================================================ Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: Memory Events Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 15419966.36 |============================================ CPUFreq Performance . 15428518.92 |============================================ Sysbench 2018-07-28 Test: CPU Events Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 90585.22 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 90701.13 |=============================================== Xsbench 2017-07-06 Lookups/s > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 3141666 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 3157143 |================================================ NeatBench 5 Acceleration: CPU FPS > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 32.6 |=================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 32.9 |=================================================== DDraceNetwork 15.2.3 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL 2.0 - Zoom: Default - Demo: Multeasymap Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 305.92 |================================================ CPUFreq Performance . 309.34 |================================================= DDraceNetwork 15.2.3 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL 2.0 - Zoom: Default - Demo: Multeasymap - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... MIN: 2.1 AVG: 3.4 MAX: 6.5 CPUFreq Performance . MIN: 2.4 AVG: 3.2 MAX: 4.5 DDraceNetwork 15.2.3 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL 3.3 - Zoom: Default - Demo: Multeasymap Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 463.17 |=============================================== CPUFreq Performance . 483.43 |================================================= DDraceNetwork 15.2.3 Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Mode: Fullscreen - Renderer: OpenGL 3.3 - Zoom: Default - Demo: Multeasymap - Total Frame Time Milliseconds < Lower Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... MIN: 2.0 AVG: 2.4 MAX: 8.1 CPUFreq Performance . MIN: 2.0 AVG: 2.1 MAX: 9.2 yquake2 7.45 Renderer: OpenGL 3.x - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 987.0 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 990.6 |================================================== yquake2 7.45 Renderer: Software CPU - Resolution: 3840 x 2160 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better CPUFreq Schedutil ... 48.9 |================================================== CPUFreq Performance . 49.8 |===================================================