Intel Xeon E3-1235L v5 testing with a ASRockRack C236M WS (P2.60 BIOS) and Intel HD 530 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.
Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the
Phoronix Test Suite by running the command:
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101250-HA-XEONCRYPT72
xeon-crypt ,
"QuantLib 1.21 - ",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",1726.6,1714.1,1723.6
"2",1634,1725.3,1720.2,1722.5
"3",1611.5,1709.2,1722.6,1719.9,1725
"Gcrypt Library 1.9 - ",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",301.256,299.986,303.274
"1a",302.318,300.303,301.999
"2",302.829,301.434,300.183
"3",300.048,302.795,301.39
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Magi",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",66.91,66.82,66.74
"2",66.98,66.94,66.92
"3",67,67.03,66.97
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: x25x",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",76.58,76.49,76.3
"2",76.54,76.59,76.6
"3",76.64,76.58,76.62
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Deepcoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",2211.37,2017.65,2017.91,2014.09,2019.17,2011.06,2020.7,2029.66,2015.11,2020.71,2019.43,2015.61,2008.79
"2",2018.15,2013.59,2031.2
"3",2025.81,2014.85,2029.4
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Ringcoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",529.65,528.48,532.5
"2",526.98,531.64,532.16
"3",395.5,528.11,537.03,532.51,527.81,527.76,527.21,531.85,530.4,531.27,532,525.24
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Blake-2 S",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",84750,85650,85190
"2",86120,85190,85650
"3",85650,85190,85190
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Garlicoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",493.11,493.16,493.2
"2",493.16,493.45,493.32
"3",493.2,493.23,493.25
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Skeincoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",10590,10590,10420
"2",10590,10420,10570
"3",
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",3405.68,3418.04,3412.19
"2",3412.92,3404.91,3399.33
"3",3402.75,3381.81,3398.49
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",7345.36,7348.76,7341.96
"2",7345.36,7352.16,7345.36
"3",7328.49,7345.36,7348.76
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",16020,16200,16100
"2",15910,16200,15830
"3",16130,16160,15360
"Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 - Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin",
Higher Results Are Better
"1",21570,21570,20140,21570,20940
"2",21540,19950,21480,21590,21480,21570,21590
"3",21540,21570,19190,21570,20200,21570,21590,21480,20110,21590,18500,21540,21040
"FinanceBench 2016-07-25 - Benchmark: Monte-Carlo OpenMP",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",43464.066406,43500.679688,42983.84375
"2",42479.273438,42897.558594,43931.085938
"3",43075.804688,43392.265625,43134.472656
"GnuPG 2.2.27 - 2.7GB Sample File Encryption",
Lower Results Are Better
"1",102.578,101.366,100.993
"2",101.891,101.373,101.247
"3",102.415,101.418,101.47
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",350,352,352
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1232,1229,1225
"2",1231,1230,1225
"3",1225,1229,1227
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1363,1359,1361
"2",1359,1359,1357
"3",1353,1356,1356
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",73,72,72
"2",73,72,72
"3",72,71,71
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",
"2",501,500,499
"3",498,499,499
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",156,154,156
"2",
"3",
"lzbench 1.8 - Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",772,772,774
"2",
"3",772,771,771
"Redis 6.0.9 - Test: LPOP",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1778766.25,1756240.38,1809995.25
"2",1152892.75,1157723.62,1159159
"3",1150751.75,1146935.25,1134190.75
"Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SADD",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1459256.88,1456032.62,1457725.88
"2",1426995.5,1450162.38,1450171.75
"3",1423897.5,1355945.25,1449490,1448039.38,1433331.12
"Redis 6.0.9 - Test: LPUSH",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1142596,1140908.62,1131759.12
"2",1138866.12,1132118.12,1138873.5
"3",1130739,1124747.25,1142995.12
"Redis 6.0.9 - Test: GET",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1709710.38,1675630,1664213
"2",1600046.12,1586566.38,1577820.12
"3",1565230.25,1596184.5,1584535
"Redis 6.0.9 - Test: SET",
Higher Results Are Better
"1a",1306002.88,1283861.88,1311517.38
"2",1297715,1310637,1315802.12
"3",1251881.88,1313239.75,1277143.25