Xeon Gold Weekend Intel Xeon Gold 6226R testing with a Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic (x86_64) 20200920, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic (x86_64) 20200920, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6226R @ 3.90GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X11SPL-F v1.02 (3.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 188GB, Disk: 3841GB Micron_9300_MTFDHAL3T8TDP, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc6daily20200921-generic (x86_64) 20200920, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.8 (LLVM 10.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 CloverLeaf Lagrangian-Eulerian Hydrodynamics Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 45.83 |==================================================================== 2 . 45.73 |==================================================================== 3 . 45.73 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 376.17 |================================================================== 2 . 381.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 379.08 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 484.56 |=================================================================== 2 . 471.95 |================================================================= 3 . 482.66 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13557 |==================================================================== 2 . 13517 |==================================================================== 3 . 13000 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2826.13 |================================================================== 2 . 2624.28 |============================================================= 3 . 2756.73 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 682701 |=================================================================== 2 . 648007 |================================================================ 3 . 674335 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6345.86 |================================================================== 2 . 6289.09 |================================================================= 3 . 6287.71 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 154083 |=================================================================== 2 . 152283 |================================================================== 3 . 142930 |============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 13840 |=================================================================== 2 . 13707 |=================================================================== 3 . 13955 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 94847 |=================================================================== 2 . 94405 |=================================================================== 3 . 95738 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 109393 |================================================================== 2 . 110870 |=================================================================== 3 . 102307 |============================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 205558 |=================================================================== 2 . 189637 |============================================================== 3 . 195802 |================================================================ Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1256.17 |================================================================== 2 . 1256.48 |================================================================== 3 . 1255.52 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 306.88 |=================================================================== 2 . 303.14 |================================================================== 3 . 308.19 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 169.82 |=================================================================== 2 . 170.22 |=================================================================== 3 . 170.51 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 283.45 |================================================================== 2 . 285.52 |=================================================================== 3 . 287.35 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 52319.10 |================================================================ 2 . 52456.92 |================================================================ 3 . 52960.25 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 92868.07 |================================================================ 2 . 94292.10 |================================================================= 3 . 92908.94 |================================================================ Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 230.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 231.10 |=================================================================== 3 . 230.60 |=================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 77.72 |==================================================================== 2 . 77.44 |==================================================================== 3 . 77.43 |==================================================================== Google SynthMark 20201109 Test: VoiceMark_100 Voices > Higher Is Better 1 . 562.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 563.38 |=================================================================== 3 . 561.59 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 39 |======================================================================= 2 . 39 |======================================================================= 3 . 39 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 104 |====================================================================== 2 . 104 |====================================================================== 3 . 104 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 461 |====================================================================== 2 . 460 |====================================================================== 3 . 460 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1608 |===================================================================== 2 . 1607 |===================================================================== 3 . 1611 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 79 |======================================================================= 2 . 78 |====================================================================== 3 . 79 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1603 |===================================================================== 2 . 1604 |===================================================================== 3 . 1604 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 99 |===================================================================== 2 . 98 |===================================================================== 3 . 100 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 431 |====================================================================== 2 . 431 |====================================================================== 3 . 431 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 409 |====================================================================== 2 . 407 |===================================================================== 3 . 410 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 566 |====================================================================== 2 . 566 |====================================================================== 3 . 566 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 176 |====================================================================== 2 . 176 |====================================================================== 3 . 176 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 652 |====================================================================== 2 . 652 |====================================================================== 3 . 652 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 199 |====================================================================== 2 . 199 |====================================================================== 3 . 199 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1083 |===================================================================== 2 . 1083 |===================================================================== 3 . 1083 |===================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 46844.41 |================================================================= 2 . 47154.78 |================================================================= 3 . 47008.86 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11659.45 |============================================================= 2 . 11687.51 |============================================================= 3 . 12426.57 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1508.72 |================================================================ 2 . 1505.76 |=============================================================== 3 . 1566.00 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1850.52 |=============================================================== 2 . 1788.49 |============================================================= 3 . 1938.05 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 26314.36 |================================================================= 2 . 25803.94 |================================================================ 3 . 25971.90 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1418.74 |================================================================ 2 . 1442.06 |================================================================= 3 . 1459.23 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 48539.47 |================================================================= 2 . 48085.57 |================================================================ 3 . 48836.07 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 26730.05 |=============================================================== 2 . 26986.50 |=============================================================== 3 . 27670.58 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20127.16 |================================================================ 2 . 20173.98 |================================================================ 3 . 20498.64 |================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 509 |====================================================================== 2 . 511 |====================================================================== 3 . 506 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 635 |====================================================================== 2 . 636 |====================================================================== 3 . 620 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 130 |===================================================================== 2 . 131 |====================================================================== 3 . 131 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 7697 |===================================================================== 2 . 7688 |===================================================================== 3 . 7668 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 5788 |================================================================= 2 . 5947 |================================================================== 3 . 6176 |===================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 55.04 |=================================================================== 2 . 55.99 |==================================================================== 3 . 56.27 |==================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2209.4 |=================================================================== 2 . 2200.3 |=================================================================== 3 . 2202.0 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2313006.91 |=============================================================== 2 . 1599875.00 |============================================ 3 . 1600325.79 |============================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1919267.04 |=============================================================== 2 . 1906942.77 |=============================================================== 3 . 1915277.54 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1498024.71 |============================================================== 2 . 1528246.50 |=============================================================== 3 . 1500356.00 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2238423.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 2050163.46 |========================================================== 3 . 2148268.17 |============================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1701384.46 |============================================================= 2 . 1765064.67 |=============================================================== 3 . 1741171.25 |============================================================== RELION 3.1.1 Test: Basic - Device: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 1249.33 |================================================================== 2 . 1245.32 |================================================================== 3 . 1238.75 |================================================================= Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation 3.2.3 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 104.80 |=================================================================== 2 . 105.05 |=================================================================== 3 . 105.45 |===================================================================