paraview541-bechmark-reasults.txt

AMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core testing with a ASUS TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (2006 BIOS) and ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 2GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101235-HA-PARAVIEW546
Jump To Table - Results

Statistics

Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Result
Identifier
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
210123-1009
January 24 2021
  5 Minutes
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):


paraview541-bechmark-reasults.txtOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test SuiteAMD Ryzen 5 1600 Six-Core @ 3.20GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads)ASUS TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (2006 BIOS)AMD 17h1 x 4096 MB DDR4-2400MT/s SP004GBLFU240N02120GB Western Digital WDS120G2G0B-ASUS NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 2GB (954/2505MHz)NVIDIA GK208 HDMI/DPVZ239Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411Ubuntu 20.045.4.0-64-generic (x86_64)X Server 1.20.9NVIDIA 460.32.034.6.01.2.155GCC 9.3.0ext41920x1080ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsAudioMonitorNetworkOSKernelDisplay ServerDisplay DriverOpenGLVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionParaview541-bechmark-reasults.txt BenchmarksSystem Logs- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0x800820d - Python 3.8.5- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Full AMD retpoline IBPB: conditional STIBP: disabled RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected

paraview541-bechmark-reasults.txtparaview: Wavelet Volume - 800 x 600paraview: Wavelet Volume - 800 x 600paraview: Wavelet Contour - 800 x 600paraview: Wavelet Contour - 800 x 600paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1024 x 768paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1024 x 768paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1024 x 768paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1024 x 768paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1280 x 1024paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1280 x 1024paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1280 x 1024paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1280 x 1024paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080210123-100948.30772.76412.63131.57435.85573.66411.54120.29824.96399.28724.18386.92010.43108.67310.31107.422OpenBenchmarking.org

ParaView

This test runs ParaView benchmarks: an open-source data analytics and visualization application. Learn more via the OpenBenchmarking.org test page.

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600210123-10091122334455SE +/- 0.42, N = 348.30

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 800 x 600210123-1009170340510680850SE +/- 6.79, N = 3772.76

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600210123-10093691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 312.63

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 800 x 600210123-1009306090120150SE +/- 0.01, N = 3131.57

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768210123-1009816243240SE +/- 0.02, N = 335.85

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1024 x 768210123-1009120240360480600SE +/- 0.39, N = 3573.66

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768210123-10093691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 311.54

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1024 x 768210123-1009306090120150SE +/- 0.01, N = 3120.30

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024210123-1009612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 324.96

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1280 x 1024210123-100990180270360450SE +/- 0.26, N = 3399.29

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080210123-1009612182430SE +/- 0.01, N = 324.18

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080210123-100980160240320400SE +/- 0.18, N = 3386.92

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024210123-10093691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 310.43

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1280 x 1024210123-100920406080100SE +/- 0.01, N = 3108.67

OpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080210123-10093691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 310.31

OpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080210123-100920406080100SE +/- 0.02, N = 3107.42

16 Results Shown

ParaView:
  Wavelet Volume - 800 x 600:
    Frames / Sec
    MiVoxels / Sec
  Wavelet Contour - 800 x 600:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
  Wavelet Volume - 1024 x 768:
    Frames / Sec
    MiVoxels / Sec
  Wavelet Contour - 1024 x 768:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
  Wavelet Volume - 1280 x 1024:
    Frames / Sec
    MiVoxels / Sec
  Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080:
    Frames / Sec
    MiVoxels / Sec
  Wavelet Contour - 1280 x 1024:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec
  Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080:
    Frames / Sec
    MiPolys / Sec