10700T Friday Intel Core i7-10700T testing with a Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS) and Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Intel Core i7-10700T @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: Logic Supply RXM-181 (Z01-0002A026 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 256GB TS256GMTS800, Graphics: Intel UHD 630 3GB (1200MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC233, Monitor: DELL P2415Q, Network: Intel I219-LM + Intel I210 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1, Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.96 |==================================================================== 2 . 26.92 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.61 |=================================================================== 4 . 26.65 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 56310.70 |================================================================= 2 . 56522.92 |================================================================= 3 . 56380.37 |================================================================= 4 . 56124.63 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 80454.99 |================================================================ 2 . 81623.15 |================================================================= 3 . 80803.20 |================================================================ 4 . 80975.24 |================================================================ Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 240.48 |=================================================================== 2 . 240.00 |=================================================================== 3 . 240.40 |=================================================================== 4 . 239.89 |=================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 73.61 |==================================================================== 2 . 73.28 |==================================================================== 3 . 72.92 |=================================================================== 4 . 72.96 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 37 |======================================================================= 2 . 37 |======================================================================= 3 . 37 |======================================================================= 4 . 37 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 102 |====================================================================== 2 . 102 |====================================================================== 3 . 102 |====================================================================== 4 . 102 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 457 |====================================================================== 2 . 457 |====================================================================== 3 . 454 |===================================================================== 4 . 458 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1566 |===================================================================== 2 . 1566 |===================================================================== 3 . 1563 |===================================================================== 4 . 1565 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 79 |====================================================================== 2 . 78 |===================================================================== 3 . 79 |====================================================================== 4 . 80 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1683 |===================================================================== 2 . 1674 |===================================================================== 3 . 1678 |===================================================================== 4 . 1682 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 95 |===================================================================== 2 . 98 |======================================================================= 3 . 96 |====================================================================== 4 . 96 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 456 |====================================================================== 2 . 456 |====================================================================== 3 . 456 |====================================================================== 4 . 456 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 419 |====================================================================== 2 . 421 |====================================================================== 3 . 420 |====================================================================== 4 . 418 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 576 |====================================================================== 2 . 576 |====================================================================== 3 . 576 |====================================================================== 4 . 576 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 168 |====================================================================== 2 . 168 |====================================================================== 3 . 168 |====================================================================== 4 . 168 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 669 |====================================================================== 2 . 670 |====================================================================== 3 . 671 |====================================================================== 4 . 669 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 216 |===================================================================== 2 . 217 |====================================================================== 3 . 218 |====================================================================== 4 . 217 |====================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4816.29 |================================================================== 2 . 4629.03 |=============================================================== 3 . 4636.75 |================================================================ 4 . 4605.86 |=============================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 915.26 |=================================================================== 2 . 890.09 |================================================================= 3 . 906.10 |================================================================== 4 . 893.50 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 822.00 |=================================================================== 2 . 785.97 |================================================================ 3 . 813.23 |================================================================== 4 . 813.42 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10980.34 |================================================================= 2 . 10680.90 |=============================================================== 3 . 10724.44 |=============================================================== 4 . 10755.04 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 764.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 751.03 |================================================================== 3 . 750.20 |================================================================== 4 . 753.45 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20253.19 |================================================================ 2 . 20254.93 |================================================================ 3 . 20712.87 |================================================================= 4 . 20569.33 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9403.63 |================================================================= 2 . 9412.28 |================================================================== 3 . 9482.88 |================================================================== 4 . 9428.68 |================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2702505.67 |=============================================================== 2 . 1658521.92 |======================================= 3 . 1623835.71 |====================================== 4 . 1659280.42 |======================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2167900.58 |=============================================================== 2 . 2153033.42 |=============================================================== 3 . 2130545.19 |============================================================== 4 . 2144146.08 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1640798.17 |=============================================================== 2 . 1635401.87 |=============================================================== 3 . 1631174.71 |============================================================== 4 . 1644397.58 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2565361.25 |=============================================================== 2 . 2415588.83 |=========================================================== 3 . 2386050.85 |=========================================================== 4 . 2435955.75 |============================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1837221.00 |============================================================ 2 . 1898199.92 |============================================================== 3 . 1916970.88 |=============================================================== 4 . 1896697.71 |==============================================================