EPYC 7F52 Weekend AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core testing with a Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.10.3-051003-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.10.3-051003-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD EPYC 7F52 16-Core @ 3.50GHz (16 Cores / 32 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro H11DSi-NT v2.00 (2.1 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 64GB, Disk: 280GB INTEL SSDPE21D280GA, Graphics: llvmpipe, Monitor: VE228 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.10.3-051003-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.0.4 (LLVM 9.0.1 128 bits), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2322.3 |=================================================================== 2 . 2314.0 |=================================================================== 3 . 2324.0 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1186.40 |================================================================== 2 . 1185.72 |================================================================== 3 . 1189.08 |================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 271.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 271.78 |=================================================================== 3 . 272.00 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 160.12 |=================================================================== 2 . 160.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 160.07 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 257.21 |=================================================================== 2 . 257.12 |=================================================================== 3 . 257.05 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 74244.18 |================================================================= 2 . 74409.14 |================================================================= 3 . 74392.62 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 17362.66 |================================================================ 2 . 17290.04 |================================================================ 3 . 17678.30 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1406.82 |================================================================== 2 . 1406.37 |================================================================== 3 . 1398.91 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1412.71 |================================================================== 2 . 1412.62 |================================================================== 3 . 1413.20 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 36835.15 |================================================================= 2 . 36845.54 |================================================================= 3 . 36810.96 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1596.44 |================================================================== 2 . 1595.17 |================================================================== 3 . 1595.74 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 66210.72 |================================================================ 2 . 67598.46 |================================================================= 3 . 67655.54 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 46933.86 |================================================================= 2 . 46981.16 |================================================================= 3 . 46951.91 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 60930.18 |================================================================= 2 . 60521.16 |================================================================= 3 . 59747.78 |================================================================ lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 38 |======================================================================= 2 . 38 |======================================================================= 3 . 38 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 117 |====================================================================== 2 . 116 |===================================================================== 3 . 117 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 513 |====================================================================== 2 . 512 |====================================================================== 3 . 512 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1556 |===================================================================== 2 . 1557 |===================================================================== 3 . 1555 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 97 |====================================================================== 2 . 97 |====================================================================== 3 . 98 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1740 |===================================================================== 2 . 1739 |===================================================================== 3 . 1738 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 106 |====================================================================== 2 . 106 |====================================================================== 3 . 106 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 454 |====================================================================== 2 . 455 |====================================================================== 3 . 454 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 486 |====================================================================== 2 . 488 |====================================================================== 3 . 487 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 563 |====================================================================== 2 . 563 |====================================================================== 3 . 564 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 194 |====================================================================== 2 . 193 |====================================================================== 3 . 193 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 670 |====================================================================== 2 . 669 |====================================================================== 3 . 670 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 240 |====================================================================== 2 . 239 |====================================================================== 3 . 239 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1126 |===================================================================== 2 . 1126 |===================================================================== 3 . 1125 |===================================================================== QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 26.94 |=================================================================== 2 . 27.31 |==================================================================== 3 . 26.85 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 224.16 |=================================================================== 2 . 223.60 |=================================================================== 3 . 224.01 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 834.50 |=================================================================== 2 . 834.73 |=================================================================== 3 . 834.13 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 529.63 |=================================================================== 2 . 532.07 |=================================================================== 3 . 531.57 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14710 |==================================================================== 2 . 14533 |=================================================================== 3 . 14343 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2226.54 |================================================================== 2 . 2224.47 |================================================================== 3 . 2232.93 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 555593 |=================================================================== 2 . 553680 |=================================================================== 3 . 532650 |================================================================ Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3561.12 |================================================================== 2 . 3581.84 |================================================================== 3 . 3557.62 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 125147 |=================================================================== 2 . 126070 |=================================================================== 3 . 125807 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 19561.50 |================================================================= 2 . 14408.49 |================================================ 3 . 15840.18 |===================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 46290 |=================================================================== 2 . 46673 |=================================================================== 3 . 47293 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 100563 |=================================================================== 2 . 100697 |=================================================================== 3 . 99417 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 133183 |=================================================================== 2 . 133213 |=================================================================== 3 . 132467 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 44212.69 |================================================================= 2 . 44469.53 |================================================================= 3 . 44145.30 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 75330.26 |================================================================ 2 . 74841.87 |================================================================ 3 . 75991.29 |================================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1762023.78 |=============================================================== 2 . 1189182.29 |=========================================== 3 . 1165576.55 |========================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1485937.90 |=============================================================== 2 . 1472079.42 |============================================================== 3 . 1495629.17 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1161192.96 |=============================================================== 2 . 1145456.96 |============================================================== 3 . 1134796.29 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1614743.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 1593488.17 |============================================================== 3 . 1563673.46 |============================================================= Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1314077.04 |=============================================================== 2 . 1293523.87 |============================================================== 3 . 1296106.71 |============================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 269 |=================================================================== 2 . 278 |===================================================================== 3 . 282 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 476 |============================================================ 2 . 555 |====================================================================== 3 . 545 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 79 |======================================================================= 2 . 79 |======================================================================= 3 . 79 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 9782 |===================================================================== 2 . 9790 |===================================================================== 3 . 9775 |===================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 4919 |=================================================================== 2 . 4945 |=================================================================== 3 . 5103 |===================================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 73.17 |==================================================================== 2 . 72.90 |==================================================================== 3 . 72.89 |====================================================================