5600X Week AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core testing with a ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1216 BIOS) and XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1216 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.10.4-051004-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1216 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.10.4-051004-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1216 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.10.4-051004-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core @ 3.70GHz (6 Cores / 12 Threads), Motherboard: ASUS TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (1216 BIOS), Chipset: AMD Starship/Matisse, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: XFX AMD Radeon R9 285/380 2GB (918/1375MHz), Audio: AMD Tonga HDMI Audio, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8125 2.5GbE + Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.10.4-051004-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.6 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 760.79 |=================================================================== 2 . 759.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 762.14 |=================================================================== 4 . 761.84 |=================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 174.92 |================================================================== 2 . 175.45 |=================================================================== 3 . 176.36 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Blake-2 S kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 245500 |=============================================================== 2 . 260080 |=================================================================== 3 . 253811 |================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: fcn-resnet101-11 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 67 |====================================================================== 2 . 68 |======================================================================= 3 . 68 |======================================================================= ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: yolov4 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 426 |====================================================================== 2 . 426 |====================================================================== 3 . 427 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: bertsquad-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 637 |====================================================================== 2 . 637 |====================================================================== 3 . 640 |====================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: shufflenet-v2-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 19858 |==================================================================== 2 . 19921 |==================================================================== 3 . 19906 |==================================================================== ONNX Runtime 1.6 Model: super-resolution-10 - Device: OpenMP CPU Inferences Per Minute > Higher Is Better 1 . 4870 |===================================================================== 2 . 4871 |===================================================================== 3 . 4873 |===================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Myriad-Groestl kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15183 |================================================================== 2 . 15080 |================================================================= 3 . 15732 |==================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 25333.48 |================================================================ 2 . 25511.18 |================================================================= 3 . 25539.49 |================================================================= 4 . 25518.32 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Ringcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1688.30 |================================================================== 2 . 1693.96 |================================================================== 3 . 1518.26 |=========================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 36091.54 |================================================================= 2 . 35847.75 |================================================================ 3 . 36268.90 |================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Quad SHA-256, Pyrite kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 62553 |==================================================================== 2 . 61707 |=================================================================== 3 . 57976 |=============================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 51651.39 |================================================================ 2 . 52077.53 |================================================================= 3 . 51405.30 |================================================================ GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 55.91 |==================================================================== 2 . 55.54 |==================================================================== 3 . 55.49 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Skeincoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 67543 |=================================================================== 2 . 68193 |==================================================================== 3 . 67178 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Deepcoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7350.10 |================================================================= 2 . 7474.51 |================================================================== 3 . 7442.54 |================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2250855.77 |============================================================== 2 . 2267106.25 |=============================================================== 3 . 2274918.58 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 165 |====================================================================== 2 . 165 |====================================================================== 3 . 165 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 53 |======================================================================= 2 . 53 |======================================================================= 3 . 53 |======================================================================= Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Garlicoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1748.31 |================================================================= 2 . 1768.69 |================================================================== 3 . 1766.45 |================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Triple SHA-256, Onecoin kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 82383 |==================================================================== 2 . 82507 |==================================================================== 3 . 82113 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: Magi kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 358.54 |=================================================================== 2 . 356.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 357.86 |=================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: LBC, LBRY Credits kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 24927 |=================================================================== 2 . 24837 |=================================================================== 3 . 25117 |==================================================================== Cpuminer-Opt 3.15.5 Algorithm: x25x kH/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 250.19 |================================================================== 2 . 255.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 252.92 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2425 |==================================================================== 2 . 2394 |==================================================================== 3 . 2443 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 122 |====================================================================== 2 . 121 |===================================================================== 3 . 122 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 686 |====================================================================== 2 . 686 |====================================================================== 3 . 686 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 166 |====================================================================== 2 . 161 |==================================================================== 3 . 166 |====================================================================== QuantLib 1.21 MFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 3129.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 3117.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 3118.9 |=================================================================== 4 . 3106.5 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 944 |====================================================================== 2 . 946 |====================================================================== 3 . 913 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 259 |====================================================================== 2 . 258 |====================================================================== 3 . 258 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 794 |====================================================================== 2 . 792 |====================================================================== 3 . 793 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 610 |====================================================================== 2 . 611 |====================================================================== 3 . 610 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2212 |===================================================================== 2 . 2228 |===================================================================== 3 . 2223 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 659 |====================================================================== 2 . 663 |====================================================================== 3 . 661 |====================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC2 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 228.82 |=================================================================== 2 . 229.08 |=================================================================== 3 . 228.94 |=================================================================== 4 . 228.82 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2834305.92 |=============================================================== 2 . 2802012.25 |============================================================== 3 . 2750028.43 |============================================================= QMCPACK 3.10 Input: simple-H2O Total Execution Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 19.76 |==================================================================== 2 . 19.76 |==================================================================== 3 . 19.79 |==================================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 17.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 17.51 |==================================================================== 3 . 17.63 |==================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 + Dithering Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 335.82 |=================================================================== 2 . 336.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 336.78 |=================================================================== 4 . 336.18 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3891232.08 |=============================================================== 2 . 2331314.92 |====================================== 3 . 2346925.33 |====================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3104793.58 |============================================================== 2 . 3101113.67 |============================================================== 3 . 3135294.20 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 325 |====================================================================== 2 . 324 |====================================================================== 3 . 325 |====================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: ETC1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 370.38 |=================================================================== 2 . 370.25 |=================================================================== 3 . 370.33 |=================================================================== 4 . 370.42 |=================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3681677.42 |=============================================================== 2 . 3508600.92 |============================================================ 3 . 3525748.58 |============================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 761.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 759.46 |=================================================================== 3 . 758.93 |=================================================================== 4 . 761.31 |=================================================================== Etcpak 0.7 Configuration: DXT1 Mpx/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1473.27 |================================================================== 2 . 1472.64 |================================================================== 3 . 1474.60 |================================================================== 4 . 1477.98 |==================================================================