c1700 AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core testing with a MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) v1.0 (1.H0 BIOS) and AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) v1.0 (1.H0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 840, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1266/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 1a: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) v1.0 (1.H0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 840, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1266/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) v1.0 (1.H0 BIOS), Chipset: AMD 17h, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 120GB Samsung SSD 840, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 470/480/570/570X/580/580X/590 8GB (1266/2000MHz), Audio: AMD Ellesmere HDMI Audio, Monitor: VA2431, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: amdgpu 19.1.0, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0), Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 5844.66 |================================================================= 1a . 5813.97 |================================================================= 2 .. 5839.36 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 406.08 |================================================================== 1a . 408.63 |================================================================== 2 .. 408.57 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 409.58 |================================================================== 1a . 409.76 |================================================================== 2 .. 409.49 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 10601.91 |================================================================ 1a . 10611.63 |================================================================ 2 .. 10616.68 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 18133.78 |================================================================ 1a . 18212.10 |================================================================ 2 .. 18098.70 |================================================================ NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 10457.59 |=============================================================== 1a . 10680.88 |================================================================ 2 .. 10567.61 |=============================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 30 |====================================================================== 1a . 30 |====================================================================== 2 .. 30 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 89 |====================================================================== 1a . 89 |====================================================================== 2 .. 89 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 404 |==================================================================== 1a . 408 |===================================================================== 2 .. 406 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 1181 |=============================================================== 1a . 1277 |==================================================================== 2 .. 1233 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 72 |===================================================================== 1a . 72 |===================================================================== 2 .. 73 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 1348 |================================================================== 1a . 1361 |=================================================================== 2 .. 1384 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 70 |====================================================================== 1a . 69 |===================================================================== 2 .. 68 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 382 |==================================================================== 1a . 387 |===================================================================== 2 .. 382 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 360 |=================================================================== 1a . 373 |===================================================================== 2 .. 371 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 430 |================================================================= 1a . 446 |==================================================================== 2 .. 454 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 154 |===================================================================== 1a . 150 |=================================================================== 2 .. 155 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 533 |==================================================================== 1a . 527 |=================================================================== 2 .. 542 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 .. 146 |==================================================================== 1a . 148 |===================================================================== 2 .. 148 |===================================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 .. 32.93 |=================================================================== 1a . 32.97 |=================================================================== 2 .. 32.84 |=================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 .. 50803.05 |================================================================ 1a . 51052.55 |================================================================ 2 .. 50809.95 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 .. 71430.92 |================================================================ 1a . 71160.60 |================================================================ 2 .. 71149.17 |================================================================ Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 26170.7 |================================================================== 2 . 24352.4 |============================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 54127.4 |================================================================== 2 . 53083.7 |================================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 25193.6 |================================================================== 2 . 23952.5 |=============================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24473.6 |================================================================== 2 . 24477.0 |================================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Add - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24927.8 |================================================================== 2 . 24465.6 |================================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 55329.0 |================================================================== 2 . 53787.6 |================================================================ Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Get - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 56326.0 |================================================================== 2 . 52062.2 |============================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24057.4 |================================================================== 2 . 24139.8 |================================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Set - Connections: 64 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 24524.3 |================================================================== 2 . 24621.9 |================================================================== Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 27702.7 |================================================================== 2 . 23728.5 |========================================================= Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Delete - Connections: 1 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 54078.7 |================================================================== 2 . 52180.4 |================================================================ Memcached mcperf 1.6.9 Method: Append - Connections: 16 Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 26466.6 |================================================================== 2 . 26315.2 |==================================================================