10885h npb and more Intel Core i9-10885H testing with a HP 8736 (S91 Ver. 01.02.01 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 16GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i9-10885H @ 5.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8736 (S91 Ver. 01.02.01 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB Kioxia KXG50PNV2T04, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 16GB (600/6000MHz), Audio: Intel Comet Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.6.0-1042-oem (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: NVIDIA 450.102.04, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.0.228, Vulkan: 1.2.133, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i9-10885H @ 5.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8736 (S91 Ver. 01.02.01 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB Kioxia KXG50PNV2T04, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 16GB (600/6000MHz), Audio: Intel Comet Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.6.0-1042-oem (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: NVIDIA 450.102.04, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.0.228, Vulkan: 1.2.133, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i9-10885H @ 5.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8736 (S91 Ver. 01.02.01 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB Kioxia KXG50PNV2T04, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 16GB (600/6000MHz), Audio: Intel Comet Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.6.0-1042-oem (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: NVIDIA 450.102.04, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.0.228, Vulkan: 1.2.133, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 4: Processor: Intel Core i9-10885H @ 5.30GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: HP 8736 (S91 Ver. 01.02.01 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Comet Lake PCH, Memory: 32GB, Disk: 2048GB Kioxia KXG50PNV2T04, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design 16GB (600/6000MHz), Audio: Intel Comet Lake PCH cAVS, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.6.0-1042-oem (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.4, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: NVIDIA 450.102.04, OpenGL: 4.6.0, OpenCL: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA 11.0.228, Vulkan: 1.2.133, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0 + CUDA 10.1, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4689.76 |================================================================== 2 . 4641.79 |================================================================= 3 . 4691.19 |================================================================== 4 . 4692.58 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 880.71 |================================================================== 2 . 889.43 |=================================================================== 3 . 887.02 |=================================================================== 4 . 881.64 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 808.43 |=================================================================== 2 . 810.98 |=================================================================== 3 . 784.16 |================================================================= 4 . 796.85 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 10297.76 |================================================================= 2 . 10325.36 |================================================================= 3 . 10285.16 |================================================================= 4 . 10260.78 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: IS.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 711.86 |=================================================================== 2 . 712.54 |=================================================================== 3 . 714.89 |=================================================================== 4 . 715.24 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 20193.34 |================================================================= 2 . 20182.40 |================================================================= 3 . 20206.31 |================================================================= 4 . 20202.86 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9542.43 |================================================================== 2 . 9524.42 |================================================================== 3 . 9533.26 |================================================================== 4 . 9521.71 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 49 |====================================================================== 2 . 50 |======================================================================= 3 . 46 |================================================================= 4 . 46 |================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 131 |===================================================================== 2 . 132 |====================================================================== 3 . 127 |=================================================================== 4 . 127 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 602 |===================================================================== 2 . 609 |====================================================================== 3 . 591 |==================================================================== 4 . 582 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2010 |==================================================================== 2 . 2032 |===================================================================== 3 . 1954 |================================================================== 4 . 1932 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 111 |====================================================================== 2 . 106 |=================================================================== 3 . 109 |===================================================================== 4 . 107 |=================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2164 |==================================================================== 2 . 2194 |===================================================================== 3 . 2144 |=================================================================== 4 . 2104 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 128 |=================================================================== 2 . 127 |=================================================================== 3 . 133 |====================================================================== 4 . 129 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 582 |===================================================================== 2 . 587 |====================================================================== 3 . 588 |====================================================================== 4 . 579 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 535 |====================================================================== 2 . 533 |====================================================================== 3 . 536 |====================================================================== 4 . 527 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 746 |====================================================================== 2 . 750 |====================================================================== 3 . 724 |==================================================================== 4 . 712 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 227 |====================================================================== 2 . 227 |====================================================================== 3 . 226 |===================================================================== 4 . 228 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 867 |====================================================================== 2 . 872 |====================================================================== 3 . 855 |===================================================================== 4 . 873 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 280 |====================================================================== 2 . 278 |===================================================================== 3 . 279 |====================================================================== 4 . 281 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1425 |==================================================================== 2 . 1435 |===================================================================== 3 . 1411 |==================================================================== 4 . 1436 |===================================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 20.68 |=================================================================== 2 . 20.41 |================================================================== 3 . 21.11 |==================================================================== 4 . 20.50 |================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 184.19 |=================================================================== 2 . 181.09 |================================================================== 3 . 182.89 |=================================================================== 4 . 182.63 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 69896.59 |================================================================= 2 . 69355.55 |================================================================ 3 . 70228.51 |================================================================= 4 . 69357.28 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 123435.27 |================================================================ 2 . 123578.63 |================================================================ 3 . 123587.75 |================================================================ 4 . 123542.42 |================================================================ FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Monte-Carlo OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 1653.13 |================================================================== 2 . 1652.69 |================================================================== 3 . 1653.26 |================================================================== 4 . 1651.90 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Black-Scholes OpenCL ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 27.74 |==================================================================== 2 . 27.68 |==================================================================== 3 . 27.64 |=================================================================== 4 . 27.86 |====================================================================