tigerlake friday Intel Core i7-1165G7 testing with a Dell 0GG9PT (1.0.3 BIOS) and Intel UHD 3GB on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (1.0.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.1.0-devel (git-c57ef25 2021-01-21 groovy-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 2: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (1.0.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.1.0-devel (git-c57ef25 2021-01-21 groovy-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 3: Processor: Intel Core i7-1165G7 @ 4.70GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Dell 0GG9PT (1.0.3 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Tiger Lake-LP, Memory: 16GB, Disk: Kioxia KBG40ZNS256G NVMe 256GB, Graphics: Intel UHD 3GB (1300MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC289, Network: Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.11.0-rc1-phx (x86_64) 20201228, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.2, Display Server: X Server 1.20.9, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.9, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 21.1.0-devel (git-c57ef25 2021-01-21 groovy-oibaf-ppa), Vulkan: 1.2.145, Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1200 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11474.71 |================================================================= 2 . 11388.79 |================================================================= 3 . 11426.53 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4447.74 |================================================================== 2 . 4426.62 |================================================================== 3 . 4423.85 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 251.94 |================================================================== 2 . 255.62 |=================================================================== 3 . 231.60 |============================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 207.90 |================================================================== 2 . 211.56 |=================================================================== 3 . 211.88 |=================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7104.06 |================================================================== 2 . 7097.76 |================================================================== 3 . 7057.38 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 16201.32 |================================================================= 2 . 16258.10 |================================================================= 3 . 16275.00 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 14006.11 |================================================================= 2 . 14015.86 |================================================================= 3 . 14026.55 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7829.10 |================================================================== 2 . 7777.86 |================================================================== 3 . 7792.98 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 49 |======================================================================= 2 . 47 |==================================================================== 3 . 48 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 131 |====================================================================== 2 . 131 |====================================================================== 3 . 131 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 603 |===================================================================== 2 . 607 |====================================================================== 3 . 610 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1916 |================================================================== 2 . 1967 |==================================================================== 3 . 2002 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 120 |===================================================================== 2 . 119 |===================================================================== 3 . 121 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2034 |==================================================================== 2 . 1999 |=================================================================== 3 . 2056 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 123 |====================================================================== 2 . 123 |====================================================================== 3 . 123 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 554 |===================================================================== 2 . 562 |====================================================================== 3 . 556 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 553 |====================================================================== 2 . 555 |====================================================================== 3 . 553 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 677 |==================================================================== 2 . 689 |===================================================================== 3 . 698 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 234 |====================================================================== 2 . 233 |====================================================================== 3 . 231 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 815 |====================================================================== 2 . 817 |====================================================================== 3 . 814 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 292 |===================================================================== 2 . 295 |====================================================================== 3 . 292 |===================================================================== Cython Benchmark 0.29.21 Test: N-Queens Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.53 |================================================================= 2 . 22.29 |=================================================================== 3 . 22.66 |==================================================================== Gcrypt Library 1.9 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 198.50 |================================================================== 2 . 201.07 |=================================================================== 3 . 198.68 |================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 79691.74 |================================================================= 2 . 79575.38 |================================================================= 3 . 79781.08 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 110510.48 |================================================================ 2 . 110888.14 |================================================================ 3 . 110281.41 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3606941.58 |=============================================================== 2 . 835433.52 |=============== 3 . 841454.29 |=============== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2868433.50 |=============================================================== 2 . 2851229.75 |=============================================================== 3 . 2812786.80 |============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2160162.92 |============================================================== 2 . 2139896.46 |============================================================= 3 . 2193758.75 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 3411336.30 |=============================================================== 2 . 3215163.75 |=========================================================== 3 . 3211010.50 |=========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2496281.54 |============================================================== 2 . 2507408.67 |============================================================== 3 . 2537365.42 |=============================================================== GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 61.52 |================================================================ 2 . 62.03 |================================================================= 3 . 64.96 |====================================================================