10100 t Intel Core i3-10100 testing with a Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i3-10100 @ 4.30GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 9b63, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201002-generic (x86_64) 20201001, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i3-10100 @ 4.30GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 9b63, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201002-generic (x86_64) 20201001, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i3-10100 @ 4.30GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 9b63, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201002-generic (x86_64) 20201001, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15816.02 |================================================================= 2 . 15704.12 |================================================================= 3 . 15701.95 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3800.59 |================================================================== 2 . 3787.08 |================================================================== 3 . 3781.12 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 611.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 604.58 |================================================================== 3 . 601.67 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7887.97 |================================================================= 2 . 8016.68 |================================================================== 3 . 8068.29 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15574.72 |================================================================ 2 . 15836.20 |================================================================= 3 . 15838.62 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7678.65 |================================================================= 2 . 7779.49 |================================================================== 3 . 7785.71 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3328.67 |=============================================================== 2 . 3471.30 |================================================================== 3 . 3468.83 |================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44 |======================================================================= 2 . 44 |======================================================================= 3 . 44 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 116 |====================================================================== 2 . 116 |====================================================================== 3 . 116 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 528 |===================================================================== 2 . 533 |====================================================================== 3 . 533 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1799 |===================================================================== 2 . 1801 |===================================================================== 3 . 1804 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 91 |===================================================================== 2 . 91 |===================================================================== 3 . 93 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1956 |===================================================================== 2 . 1960 |===================================================================== 3 . 1959 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 103 |====================================================================== 2 . 102 |===================================================================== 3 . 101 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 511 |====================================================================== 2 . 511 |====================================================================== 3 . 511 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 468 |===================================================================== 2 . 473 |====================================================================== 3 . 473 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 651 |====================================================================== 2 . 651 |====================================================================== 3 . 652 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 199 |====================================================================== 2 . 200 |====================================================================== 3 . 200 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 752 |====================================================================== 2 . 754 |====================================================================== 3 . 754 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 245 |===================================================================== 2 . 248 |====================================================================== 3 . 248 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1239 |===================================================================== 2 . 1241 |===================================================================== 3 . 1238 |===================================================================== FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 70325.91 |================================================================= 2 . 70296.21 |================================================================= 3 . 70323.85 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 123374.91 |================================================================ 2 . 123411.58 |================================================================ GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.87 |==================================================================== 2 . 63.51 |====================================================================