10100 t

Intel Core i3-10100 testing with a Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.

Compare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2101219-HA-10100T87427
Jump To Table - Results

View

Do Not Show Noisy Results
Do Not Show Results With Incomplete Data
Do Not Show Results With Little Change/Spread
List Notable Results

Limit displaying results to tests within:

CPU Massive 2 Tests
Single-Threaded 2 Tests

Statistics

Show Overall Harmonic Mean(s)
Show Overall Geometric Mean
Show Geometric Means Per-Suite/Category
Show Wins / Losses Counts (Pie Chart)
Normalize Results
Remove Outliers Before Calculating Averages

Graph Settings

Force Line Graphs Where Applicable
Convert To Scalar Where Applicable
Prefer Vertical Bar Graphs

Multi-Way Comparison

Condense Multi-Option Tests Into Single Result Graphs

Table

Show Detailed System Result Table

Run Management

Highlight
Result
Hide
Result
Result
Identifier
View Logs
Performance Per
Dollar
Date
Run
  Test
  Duration
1
January 21 2021
  1 Hour, 1 Minute
2
January 21 2021
  1 Hour
3
January 21 2021
  50 Minutes
Invert Hiding All Results Option
  57 Minutes

Only show results where is faster than
Only show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):
Do not show results matching title/arguments (delimit multiple options with a comma):

10100 t Intel Core i3-10100 testing with a Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS) and Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Core i3-10100 @ 4.30GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 9b63, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201002-generic (x86_64) 20201001, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 2: Processor: Intel Core i3-10100 @ 4.30GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 9b63, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201002-generic (x86_64) 20201001, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 3: Processor: Intel Core i3-10100 @ 4.30GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: Gigabyte B460M DS3H (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 9b63, Memory: 16GB, Disk: 500GB Western Digital WDS500G3X0C-00SJG0, Graphics: Gigabyte Intel UHD 630 3GB (1100MHz), Audio: Realtek ALC887-VD, Monitor: G237HL, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.9.0-050900rc7daily20201002-generic (x86_64) 20201001, Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.3, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.6 Mesa 20.0.8, Vulkan: 1.2.131, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1920x1080 FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Repo OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 70325.91 |================================================================= 2 . 70296.21 |================================================================= 3 . 70323.85 |================================================================= FinanceBench 2016-07-25 Benchmark: Bonds OpenMP ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 123374.91 |================================================================ 2 . 123411.58 |================================================================ GnuPG 2.2.27 2.7GB Sample File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 63.87 |==================================================================== 2 . 63.51 |==================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44 |======================================================================= 2 . 44 |======================================================================= 3 . 44 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 116 |====================================================================== 2 . 116 |====================================================================== 3 . 116 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 528 |===================================================================== 2 . 533 |====================================================================== 3 . 533 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1799 |===================================================================== 2 . 1801 |===================================================================== 3 . 1804 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 91 |===================================================================== 2 . 91 |===================================================================== 3 . 93 |======================================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1956 |===================================================================== 2 . 1960 |===================================================================== 3 . 1959 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 103 |====================================================================== 2 . 102 |===================================================================== 3 . 101 |===================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 511 |====================================================================== 2 . 511 |====================================================================== 3 . 511 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 468 |===================================================================== 2 . 473 |====================================================================== 3 . 473 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 651 |====================================================================== 2 . 651 |====================================================================== 3 . 652 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 199 |====================================================================== 2 . 200 |====================================================================== 3 . 200 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 752 |====================================================================== 2 . 754 |====================================================================== 3 . 754 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 245 |===================================================================== 2 . 248 |====================================================================== 3 . 248 |====================================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1239 |===================================================================== 2 . 1241 |===================================================================== 3 . 1238 |===================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15816.02 |================================================================= 2 . 15704.12 |================================================================= 3 . 15701.95 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3800.59 |================================================================== 2 . 3787.08 |================================================================== 3 . 3781.12 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 611.78 |=================================================================== 2 . 604.58 |================================================================== 3 . 601.67 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: FT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7887.97 |================================================================= 2 . 8016.68 |================================================================== 3 . 8068.29 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 15574.72 |================================================================ 2 . 15836.20 |================================================================= 3 . 15838.62 |================================================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7678.65 |================================================================= 2 . 7779.49 |================================================================== 3 . 7785.71 |================================================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 3328.67 |=============================================================== 2 . 3471.30 |================================================================== 3 . 3468.83 |==================================================================