intel-ionos KVM testing on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: 2 x Intel Core (Haswell) (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.12.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 1024 MB RAM QEMU, Disk: 16GB, Graphics: Red Hat QXL paravirtual graphic card, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-52-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM 2: Processor: 2 x Intel Core (Haswell) (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.12.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 1024 MB RAM QEMU, Disk: 16GB, Graphics: Red Hat QXL paravirtual graphic card, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-52-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM 3: Processor: 2 x Intel Core (Haswell) (2 Cores / 4 Threads), Motherboard: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX 1996) (1.12.0-1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 440FX 82441FX PMC, Memory: 1 x 1024 MB RAM QEMU, Disk: 16GB, Graphics: Red Hat QXL paravirtual graphic card, Network: Red Hat Virtio device OS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.4.0-52-generic (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768, System Layer: KVM BlogBench 1.1 Test: Read Final Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 397122 |=================================================================== BlogBench 1.1 Test: Write Final Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 3596 |===================================================================== ebizzy 0.3 Records/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 104254 |=================================================================== KeyDB 6.0.16 Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 107526.27 |================================================================ Memtier_benchmark 1.2.17 Protocol: Redis Ops/sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 629403.48 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 641347.71 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 600402.02 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 546515.29 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 629398.79 |================================================================ Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 567461.46 |================================================================ Apache Cassandra 3.11.4 Test: Writes Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6064 |===================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 92916 |==================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Read Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 8863800 |================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Sequential Fill Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 97275 |==================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Random Fill Sync Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1327 |===================================================================== Facebook RocksDB 6.3.6 Test: Read While Writing Op/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 325947 |=================================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 18061.57 |================================================================= 2 . 17875.89 |================================================================ PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 3 . 2387 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 3 . 41.91 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only TPS > Higher Is Better 3 . 2392 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 3 . 104.52 |=================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 3 . 2367 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 3 . 42.28 |==================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write TPS > Higher Is Better 3 . 2389 |===================================================================== PostgreSQL pgbench 13.0 Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latency ms < Lower Is Better 3 . 104.67 |===================================================================