bedo Intel Core i5-2500K testing with a Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS) and Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Western Digital WD800JD-75MS: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs Intel Core i5-2500K: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 0.997 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 57061.85 |====================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 22.3 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 19.61 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 22.1 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 19.90 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 0.997 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1.381 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 9.710 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 21.1 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 20.88 |========================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 237.29 |======================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 42 |===================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 40 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 130 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 124 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 462 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 447 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1239 |=================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 1192 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 95 |===================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 94 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1351 |=================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 1304 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 109 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 107 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 557 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 535 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 472 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 457 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 605 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 586 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 183 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 175 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 693 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 671 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 241 |==================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 233 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1034 |=================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 993 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1240.6 |======================================== Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1233.4 |======================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 13.2 |========================================== Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13.2 |========================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 18980 |================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 18561 |================================================= Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 365.09 |================================================ Intel Core i5-2500K . 370.87 |================================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 14.84 |================================================= Intel Core i5-2500K . 15.09 |================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 515.91 |================================================ Intel Core i5-2500K . 522.85 |================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 127.20 |================================================ Intel Core i5-2500K . 128.87 |================================================= System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4.223 |================================================== System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 3.633 |================================================== System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2049.76 |================================================ Blender 2.90 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 534.53 |================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1995.47 |================================================ Blender 2.90 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 880.41 |================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1879.99 |================================================ PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.443 |================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 5.851 |================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1446.07 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1444.87 |======================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 522.66 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 522.39 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 333.63 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 333.26 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4453.70 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 4479.76 |======================================= High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1.48956 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 8533.71 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 8545.49 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1714.96 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1677.57 |====================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 261.79 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 262.31 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 261.40 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 262.17 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 9115.31 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 9116.06 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 2839.95 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 2859.47 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1824.54 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1823.11 |======================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 334.93 |======================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 10.15 |========================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 73.21 |========================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 26.71 |========================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 128.60 |======================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 371.97 |======================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 81.30 |========================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 58.77 |========================================= NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4.84874 |======================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 16678.13 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 27.04 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 23662.08 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 63.17 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13528.55 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 49.51 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 6375.95 |======================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 36.77 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 11565.49 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 34.07 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 6625.9 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 6417.5 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4716.0 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 4587.8 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 23978 |========================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 22702 |======================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 12459 |========================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 12207 |======================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 462.06 |======================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 351.37 |======================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 133.09 |======================================== Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 119.35 |======================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3.107 |========================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 2.953 |========================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4.15 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 4.32 |========================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 34.95 |========================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 33.16 |======================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13.72 |========================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 13.30 |======================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 58.03 |========================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 55.07 |======================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 15.83 |========================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 14.97 |======================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 328.65 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 650.66 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 627.42 |======================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 161.41 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 156.02 |======================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 158.51 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 156.37 |======================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 733.35 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 705.73 |====================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 891.50 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 860.52 |======================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1308.51 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1258.46 |====================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 90.61 |========================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3121.43 |======================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 330.74 |======================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 400.16 |======================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 133.52 |======================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 8669517 |======================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1355929 |======================================= ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 263.61 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 258.41 |======================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5823 |========================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 5723 |========================================= John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 266818 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 260885 |======================================= GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 140 |=========================================== GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Global Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8107 |=================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 8093 |=================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 7813 |================================================= FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.441 |================================================= Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.379 |================================================= Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.646 |================================================== x264 2019-12-17 H.264 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 27.23 |================================================== Intel Core i5-2500K . 22.34 |========================================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.66 |=================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 19.76 |================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 46.28 |================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.44611 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 30.51 |================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.36158 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2.15651 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.03984 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.17709 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.49561 |================================================ HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 19641.08 |=============================================== Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark Figure Of Merit > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 153008.2 |=============================================== FFTE 7.0 N=256, 3D Complex FFT Routine MFLOPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8991.06 |================================================ FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7937.3 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7674.0 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7969.8 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6921.3 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7473.6 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6945.6 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7012.2 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6696.6 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6224.7 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6296.1 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6826.1 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 6631.6 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4509.2 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4740.4 |================================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 12311 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 18223 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 32 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 23863 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 64 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 22433 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 21804 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 22996 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 24923 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 128 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 20229 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 256 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 19282 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 512 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 20333 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 24049 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 24649 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 1024 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 14434 |================================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 2048 Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 12084 |================================================== Monte Carlo Simulations of Ionised Nebulae 2019-03-24 Input: Dust 2D tau100.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 303 |==================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Default Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.573 |================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100 Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2.360 |================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 16.35 |================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7.394 |================================================== WebP Image Encode 1.1 Encode Settings: Quality 100, Lossless, Highest Compression Encode Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 42.92 |================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2188.54 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1119.06 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1376.46 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1903.39 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4521.92 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2021.86 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4078.36 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 32303.30 |=============================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 34614.95 |=============================================== LibRaw 0.20 Post-Processing Benchmark Mpix/sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 23.57 |================================================== ArrayFire 3.7 Test: Conjugate Gradient CPU ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 63.05 |================================================== dav1d Git Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 154.59 |================================================= dav1d Git Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 40.95 |================================================== dav1d Git Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 153.34 |================================================= dav1d Git Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 40.67 |================================================== AOM AV1 Git AV1 Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.02 |=================================================== SVT-AV1 Git 1080p 8-bit YUV To AV1 Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.089 |================================================== SVT-HEVC Git 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.54 |=================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding Git vpxenc VP9 1080p Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 17.98 |================================================== x265 Git H.265 1080p Video Encoding Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 17.80 |================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.14 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.19 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.75 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.88 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 26.24 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.221 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.581 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.736 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.981 |================================================== SVT-HEVC 1.4.1 1080p 8-bit YUV To HEVC Video Encode Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.21 |=================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 0 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4.79 |=================================================== VP9 libvpx Encoding 1.8.2 Speed: Speed 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 18.21 |================================================== Intel Open Image Denoise 1.2.0 Scene: Memorial Images / Sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2.33 |=================================================== Stockfish 12 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 7092006 |================================================ asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 10785673 |=============================================== Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 53.71 |================================================== Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 351.74 |================================================= Timed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 105.66 |================================================= Timed LLVM Compilation 10.0 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1921.70 |================================================ Timed MPlayer Compilation 1.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 114.27 |================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 156.64 |================================================= C-Ray 1.1 Total Time - 4K, 16 Rays Per Pixel Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 223.49 |================================================= AOBench Size: 2048 x 2048 - Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 35.29 |================================================== Timed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 91.88 |================================================== DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 139.42 |================================================= LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8.635 |================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 197.48 |================================================= GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 49.93 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.600 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 19.00 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 37.48 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 73.22 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 1 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.266 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Thread Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 137.95 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 2 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 18.50 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 4 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 37.66 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 8 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 74.96 |================================================== Hackbench Count: 16 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 138.14 |================================================= Hackbench Count: 32 - Type: Process Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 279.71 |================================================= Montage Astronomical Image Mosaic Engine 6.0 Mosaic of M17, K band, 1.5 deg x 1.5 deg Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 529.11 |================================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Pod2html Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.14628268 |============================================= Perl Benchmarks Test: Interpreter Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.00094801 |============================================= RNNoise 2020-06-28 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 40.26 |================================================== System BZIP2 Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8.201 |================================================== GnuPG Linux 4.3 Package File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 15.91 |================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 664.3 |================================================== Aircrack-ng 1.5.2 k/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8072.97 |================================================ Core-Latency Average Latency Between CPU Cores ns < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 54.74 |==================================================