2020-12-25-1000
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 testing with a Supermicro X9DRW v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Peppermint 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite.


2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2: 

	Processor: 2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 @ 3.60GHz (20 Cores / 40 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X9DRW v0123456789 (3.2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E7 v2/Xeon, Memory: 4 x 16384 MB DDR3-1866MT/s Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA, Disk: 16GB USB Flash Drive, Graphics: llvmpipe, Network: 2 x Intel I350

	OS: Peppermint 10, Kernel: 5.0.0-37-generic (x86_64), Desktop: LXDE, Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.4, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 19.0.8 (LLVM 8.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 7.5.0, File-System: overlayfs, Screen Resolution: 1600x900


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Composite
Mflops > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1707.64 |==========================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Monte Carlo
Mflops > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 842.34 |===========================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform
Mflops > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1082.47 |==========================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply
Mflops > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1520.70 |==========================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization
Mflops > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 3595.17 |==========================================


Java SciMark 2.0
Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation
Mflops > Higher Is Better
2 x Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 . 1497.54 |==========================================