bedo Intel Core i5-2500K testing with a Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS) and Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. Western Digital WD800JD-75MS: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs Intel Core i5-2500K: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 0.997 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 57061.85 |====================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 22.3 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 19.61 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 22.1 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 19.90 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 0.997 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1.381 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 9.710 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 21.1 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 20.88 |========================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 237.29 |======================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 42 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 130 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 462 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1239 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 95 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1351 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 109 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 557 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 472 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 605 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 183 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 693 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 241 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1034 |=================================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1240.6 |======================================== Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1233.4 |======================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 13.2 |========================================== Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13.2 |========================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 18980 |================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 365.09 |================================================= Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 14.84 |================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 515.91 |================================================= XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 127.20 |================================================= System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4.223 |================================================== System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 3.633 |================================================== System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2049.76 |================================================ Blender 2.90 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 534.53 |================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Classroom - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1995.47 |================================================ Blender 2.90 Blend File: Fishy Cat - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 880.41 |================================================= Blender 2.90 Blend File: Pabellon Barcelona - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1879.99 |================================================ PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.443 |================================================== PHP Micro Benchmarks Test: Zend micro_bench Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 5.851 |================================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: All Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1446.07 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1444.87 |======================================= Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Keyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 522.66 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 522.39 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Unkeyed Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 333.63 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 333.26 |======================================== Crypto++ 8.2 Test: Integer + Elliptic Curve Public Key Algorithms MiB/second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4453.70 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 4479.76 |======================================= High Performance Conjugate Gradient 3.1 GFLOP/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1.48956 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: BT.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 8533.71 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 8545.49 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: CG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1714.96 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 1677.57 |====================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 261.79 |======================================== Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 262.31 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: EP.D Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 261.40 |======================================== NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: LU.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 9115.31 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: MG.C Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 2839.95 |======================================= Intel Core i5-2500K .......... 2859.47 |======================================= NAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.4 Test / Class: SP.B Total Mop/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1824.54 |======================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP LBM Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 334.93 |======================================== Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP CUTCP Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 10.15 |========================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP Stencil Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 73.21 |========================================= Parboil 2.5 Test: OpenMP MRI Gridding Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 26.71 |========================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP HotSpot3D Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 128.60 |======================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Leukocyte Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 371.97 |======================================== Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP CFD Solver Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 81.30 |========================================= Rodinia 3.1 Test: OpenMP Streamcluster Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 58.77 |========================================= NAMD 2.14 ATPase Simulation - 327,506 Atoms days/ns < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4.84874 |======================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 16678.13 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: wyhash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 27.04 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 23662.08 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: MeowHash cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 63.17 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13528.55 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: Spooky32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 49.51 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 6375.95 |======================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: fasthash32 cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 36.77 |========================================= SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce MiB/sec > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 11565.49 |====================================== SMHasher 2020-02-29 Hash: t1ha2_atonce cycles/hash < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 34.07 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 6625.9 |======================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Stock - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4716.0 |======================================== FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 1D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 23978 |========================================= FFTW 3.3.6 Build: Float + SSE - Size: 2D FFT Size 4096 Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 12459 |========================================= Pennant 1.0.1 Test: sedovbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 462.06 |======================================== Pennant 1.0.1 Test: leblancbig Hydro Cycle Time - Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 351.37 |======================================== Timed MrBayes Analysis 3.2.7 Primate Phylogeny Analysis Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 133.09 |======================================== Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 119.35 |======================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3.107 |========================================= LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 2.953 |========================================= BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 4.15 |========================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 34.95 |========================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13.72 |========================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 58.03 |========================================= libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 15.83 |========================================= Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 328.65 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 650.66 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 161.41 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 158.51 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 733.35 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 891.50 |======================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1308.51 |======================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 90.61 |========================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3121.43 |======================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 330.74 |======================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 400.16 |======================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 133.52 |======================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 8669517 |======================================= TSCP 1.81 AI Chess Performance Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1355929 |======================================= ArrayFire 3.7 Test: BLAS CPU GFLOPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 263.61 |======================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: Blowfish Real C/S > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5823 |========================================== John The Ripper 1.9.0-jumbo-1 Test: MD5 Real C/S > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 266818 |======================================== GraphicsMagick 1.3.33 Operation: Swirl Iterations Per Minute > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 140 |=========================================== GNU MPC 1.1.0 Multi-Precision Benchmark Global Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8107 |=================================================== FFmpeg 4.0.2 H.264 HD To NTSC DV Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 9.441 |==================================================