5ghz Intel Core i5-2500K testing with a Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS) and Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS on Debian 10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 2: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.00GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs Intel Core i5-2500K - Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs Intel Core i5-2500K: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs D: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs Western Digital WD800JD-75MS: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 5.90GHz (4 Cores), Motherboard: Gigabyte P67-DS3-B3 (F5 BIOS), Chipset: Intel 2nd Generation Core DRAM, Memory: 1 x 4096 MB 1600MT/s, Disk: 80GB Western Digital WD800JD-75MS, Graphics: Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS, Audio: Realtek ALC889, Network: Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 OS: Debian 10, Kernel: 5.9.0-4-amd64 (x86_64), Compiler: GCC 8.3.0, File-System: nfs Blender 2.90 Blend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-Only Seconds < Lower Is Better 2 ..................................................... 528.80 |=============== Intel Core i5-2500K - Gigabyte NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS . 533.37 |=============== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 35.12 |================================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 4K FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 13.80 |================================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Summer Nature 1080p FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 58.56 |================================================== libgav1 2019-10-05 Video Input: Chimera 1080p 10-bit FPS > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 15.92 |================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 0 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.14 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 4 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.24 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 10.21 |================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 6 Two-Pass Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1.97 |=================================================== AOM AV1 2.0 Encoder Mode: Speed 8 Realtime Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 27.26 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.232 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.608 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 0.771 |================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2.095 |================================================== OpenSSL 1.1.1 RSA 4096-bit Performance Signs Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 696.2 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Covariance Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2.365 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: Correlation Computation Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2.087 |================================================== PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4.387 |================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 42 |===================================================== D ................... 42 |===================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: XZ 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 129 |==================================================== D ................... 129 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 463 |==================================================== D ................... 463 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1252 |=================================================== D ................... 1254 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 96 |===================================================== D ................... 88 |================================================= lzbench 1.8 Test: Zstd 8 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1354 |=================================================== D ................... 1355 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 113 |==================================================== D ................... 101 |============================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Crush 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 557 |==================================================== D ................... 557 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 475 |==================================================== D ................... 466 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 0 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 601 |=================================================== D ................... 607 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 183 |==================================================== D ................... 181 |=================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Brotli 2 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 701 |==================================================== D ................... 698 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Compression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 241 |==================================================== D ................... 240 |==================================================== lzbench 1.8 Test: Libdeflate 1 - Process: Decompression MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1034 |=================================================== D ................... 1034 |=================================================== BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4.15 |=================================================== GNU GMP GMPbench 6.1.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4696.4 |================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2271.59 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1165.53 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1406.30 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1982.94 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4696.95 |================================================ Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2106.25 |================================================ Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 330.56 |================================================= Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 14934.1 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 4248.14 |================================================ CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 33651.35 |=============================================== CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 36059.33 |=============================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1244.39 |================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 592.33 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 181.80 |================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1299.45 |================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 2186.65 |================================================ LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1961.74 |================================================ SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 652.06 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 163.12 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 157.90 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 732.94 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 894.95 |================================================= SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 1311.38 |================================================ Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 90.65 |================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 3132.36 |================================================ Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 330.28 |================================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 400.22 |================================================= Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 133.36 |================================================= Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 216.31 |================================================= Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 3 MB/s > Higher Is Better D . 1264.9 |=================================================================== Zstd Compression 1.4.5 Compression Level: 19 MB/s > Higher Is Better D . 13.3 |===================================================================== 7-Zip Compression 16.02 Compress Speed Test MIPS > Higher Is Better D . 19245 |==================================================================== Parallel BZIP2 Compression 1.1.12 256MB File Compression Seconds < Lower Is Better D . 14.93 |==================================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better D . 543.04 |=================================================================== XZ Compression 5.2.4 Compressing ubuntu-16.04.3-server-i386.img, Compression Level 9 Seconds < Lower Is Better D . 133.63 |=================================================================== System GZIP Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better D . 4.304 |==================================================================== System XZ Decompression Seconds < Lower Is Better D . 3.658 |==================================================================== System ZLIB Decompression 1.2.7 ms < Lower Is Better D . 2076.24 |================================================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Hot Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1.006 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Fill Sync Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 51373.57 |====================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 22.1 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Overwrite Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 19.73 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 22.2 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 19.79 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Read Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 0.995 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Seek Random Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 1.371 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Random Delete Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 13.80 |========================================= LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 21.5 |========================================== LevelDB 1.22 Benchmark: Sequential Fill Microseconds Per Op < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 20.46 |========================================= SQLite 3.30.1 Threads / Copies: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 100.92 |======================================== PostMark 1.51 Disk Transaction Performance TPS > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 247 |=========================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memcpy MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5655.2 |======================================== Tinymembench 2018-05-28 Standard Memset MB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5936.4 |======================================== MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5441.03 |======================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5426.08 |======================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 5424.20 |======================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3699.11 |======================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3705.68 |======================================= MBW 2018-09-08 Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiB MiB/s > Higher Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 3707.24 |======================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 1 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 21.64 |========================================= t-test1 2017-01-13 Threads: 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better Western Digital WD800JD-75MS . 6.446 |========================================= Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 8655904 |================================================ Timed Apache Compilation 2.4.41 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 53.63 |================================================== Timed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.4 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 368.03 |================================================= Timed PHP Compilation 7.4.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better Intel Core i5-2500K . 157.54 |=================================================