1260L v5 Skylake December Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 testing with a ASRock E3V5 WS (P7.10 BIOS) and llvmpipe on Ubuntu 20.10 via the Phoronix Test Suite. 1: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock E3V5 WS (P7.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 120GB INTEL SSDSC2BW12, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.0, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 3.3 Mesa 20.1.8 (LLVM 10.0.1 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 2: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock E3V5 WS (P7.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 120GB INTEL SSDSC2BW12, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 3: Processor: Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 @ 3.90GHz (4 Cores / 8 Threads), Motherboard: ASRock E3V5 WS (P7.10 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Xeon E3-1200 v5/E3-1500, Memory: 8GB, Disk: 120GB INTEL SSDSC2BW12, Graphics: llvmpipe, Audio: Realtek ALC892, Network: Intel I219-LM OS: Ubuntu 20.10, Kernel: 5.8.0-20-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.38.1, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, OpenGL: 4.5 Mesa 20.2.1 (LLVM 11.0.0 256 bits), Compiler: GCC 10.2.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768 HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-HPL GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 61.32 |==================================================================== 2 . 58.31 |================================================================= 3 . 60.71 |=================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ffte GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.77252 |================================================================== 2 . 1.97485 |=============================================== 3 . 2.76829 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-DGEMM GFLOPS > Higher Is Better 1 . 32.13 |=================================================================== 2 . 27.99 |========================================================== 3 . 32.57 |==================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Ptrans GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.80189 |================================================================== 2 . 0.52527 |=========================================== 3 . 0.80334 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: EP-STREAM Triad GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 4.84713 |================================================================== 2 . 4.72080 |================================================================ 3 . 4.85764 |================================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: G-Random Access GUP/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.02395 |================================================================== 2 . 0.02230 |============================================================= 3 . 0.02358 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Latency usecs < Lower Is Better 1 . 0.26350 |=================================================== 2 . 0.34375 |================================================================== 3 . 0.26153 |================================================== HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Random Ring Bandwidth GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.61894 |================================================================== 2 . 2.49989 |=============================================================== 3 . 2.59618 |================================================================= HPC Challenge 1.5.0 Test / Class: Max Ping Pong Bandwidth MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 11177.59 |================================================================= 2 . 10433.26 |============================================================ 3 . 11232.47 |================================================================= Timed HMMer Search 3.3.1 Pfam Database Search Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 123.93 |=================================================================== 2 . 123.89 |=================================================================== 3 . 123.88 |=================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: 20k Atoms ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.622 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.621 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.620 |==================================================================== LAMMPS Molecular Dynamics Simulator 29Oct2020 Model: Rhodopsin Protein ns/day > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.623 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.614 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.612 |==================================================================== simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: Kostya GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.48 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.48 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.48 |===================================================================== simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: LargeRandom GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.37 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.37 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.37 |===================================================================== simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: PartialTweets GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.6 |====================================================================== 2 . 0.6 |====================================================================== 3 . 0.6 |====================================================================== simdjson 0.7.1 Throughput Test: DistinctUserID GB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.62 |===================================================================== 2 . 0.62 |===================================================================== 3 . 0.62 |===================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 6684.45 |================================================================== 2 . 6669.40 |================================================================== 3 . 6661.79 |================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 1 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7828.5 |=================================================================== 2 . 7882.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 7879.2 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 45.73 |==================================================================== 2 . 45.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 45.73 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 3 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7858.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 7838.2 |=================================================================== 3 . 7841.1 |=================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Compression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 44.68 |==================================================================== 2 . 44.69 |==================================================================== 3 . 44.39 |==================================================================== LZ4 Compression 1.9.3 Compression Level: 9 - Decompression Speed MB/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 7862.9 |=================================================================== 2 . 7849.9 |=================================================================== 3 . 7859.6 |=================================================================== Crafty 25.2 Elapsed Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7385971 |================================================================== 2 . 7390602 |================================================================== 3 . 7404400 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.45757 |================================================================== 2 . 9.33780 |================================================================= 3 . 9.40066 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.66 |================================================================= 2 . 12.26 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.87 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 1D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4.30343 |================================================================== 2 . 4.31403 |================================================================== 3 . 4.28945 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: IP Shapes 3D - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.98910 |================================================================== 2 . 3.01023 |================================================================== 3 . 2.96551 |================================================================= oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 22.76 |==================================================================== 2 . 22.43 |=================================================================== 3 . 22.46 |=================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.64 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.42 |=================================================================== 3 . 12.44 |=================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 16.56 |==================================================================== 2 . 16.53 |==================================================================== 3 . 16.49 |==================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Convolution Batch Shapes Auto - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 21.48 |==================================================================== 2 . 21.27 |=================================================================== 3 . 21.32 |=================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_1d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.57 |=================================================================== 2 . 12.49 |=================================================================== 3 . 12.67 |==================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Deconvolution Batch shapes_3d - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8.27205 |================================================================== 2 . 8.21954 |================================================================== 3 . 8.22943 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8905.02 |================================================================== 2 . 8951.15 |================================================================== 3 . 8949.81 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4630.54 |================================================================== 2 . 4658.80 |================================================================== 3 . 4652.31 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8915.60 |================================================================== 2 . 8951.95 |================================================================== 3 . 8947.59 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4627.43 |================================================================== 2 . 4651.69 |================================================================== 3 . 4650.30 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 5.42697 |================================================================= 2 . 5.47275 |================================================================== 3 . 5.42816 |================================================================= oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Training - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 8905.55 |================================================================== 2 . 8959.94 |================================================================== 3 . 8944.05 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Recurrent Neural Network Inference - Data Type: bf16bf16bf16 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 4632.15 |================================================================== 2 . 4652.86 |================================================================== 3 . 4657.30 |================================================================== oneDNN 2.0 Harness: Matrix Multiply Batch Shapes Transformer - Data Type: u8s8f32 - Engine: CPU ms < Lower Is Better 1 . 7.41758 |================================================================== 2 . 7.39781 |================================================================== 3 . 7.41727 |================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.81 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.81 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.81 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.85 |===================================================================== 2 . 1.85 |===================================================================== 3 . 1.85 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Slow Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 7.97 |===================================================================== 2 . 7.99 |===================================================================== 3 . 8.00 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Medium Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 8.19 |===================================================================== 2 . 8.22 |===================================================================== 3 . 8.22 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 5.13 |===================================================================== 2 . 5.14 |===================================================================== 3 . 5.14 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.41 |===================================================================== 2 . 9.36 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.41 |===================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Very Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 20.67 |==================================================================== 2 . 20.66 |==================================================================== 3 . 20.73 |==================================================================== Kvazaar 2.0 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p - Video Preset: Ultra Fast Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 37.59 |=================================================================== 2 . 37.71 |==================================================================== 3 . 37.96 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 1 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.331 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.330 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.332 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 5 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.945 |=================================================================== 2 . 0.957 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.950 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 6 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.269 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.251 |=================================================================== 3 . 1.264 |==================================================================== rav1e 0.4 Alpha Speed: 10 Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2.671 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.610 |================================================================== 3 . 2.568 |================================================================= x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 4K Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6.37 |===================================================================== 2 . 6.37 |===================================================================== 3 . 6.38 |===================================================================== x265 3.4 Video Input: Bosphorus 1080p Frames Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 28.99 |==================================================================== 2 . 28.68 |=================================================================== 3 . 28.80 |==================================================================== Coremark 1.0 CoreMark Size 666 - Iterations Per Second Iterations/Sec > Higher Is Better 1 . 138255.21 |================================================================ 2 . 137667.82 |================================================================ 3 . 137386.88 |================================================================ Stockfish 12 Total Time Nodes Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 6987974 |================================================================= 2 . 7138440 |================================================================== 3 . 6946916 |================================================================ asmFish 2018-07-23 1024 Hash Memory, 26 Depth Nodes/second > Higher Is Better 1 . 11038178 |================================================================= 2 . 10934873 |================================================================ 3 . 11016030 |================================================================= Timed FFmpeg Compilation 4.2.2 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 136.91 |=================================================================== 2 . 136.97 |=================================================================== 3 . 136.82 |=================================================================== Build2 0.13 Time To Compile Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 367.84 |=================================================================== 2 . 362.12 |================================================================== 3 . 368.09 |=================================================================== Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 314.64 |=================================================================== 2 . 314.32 |=================================================================== 3 . 312.06 |================================================================== eSpeak-NG Speech Engine 20200907 Text-To-Speech Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 31.75 |=================================================================== 2 . 32.45 |==================================================================== 3 . 31.49 |================================================================== Node.js V8 Web Tooling Benchmark runs/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 9.96 |=================================================================== 2 . 10.03 |==================================================================== 3 . 10.05 |==================================================================== GROMACS 2020.3 Water Benchmark Ns Per Day > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.449 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.448 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.450 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Fast Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 9.47 |==================================================================== 2 . 9.52 |===================================================================== 3 . 9.58 |===================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Medium Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 12.31 |==================================================================== 2 . 12.30 |==================================================================== 3 . 12.30 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Thorough Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 80.26 |==================================================================== 2 . 80.17 |==================================================================== 3 . 80.21 |==================================================================== ASTC Encoder 2.0 Preset: Exhaustive Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 641.49 |=================================================================== 2 . 641.37 |=================================================================== 3 . 641.22 |=================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: ETC1S Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 77.32 |=================================================================== 2 . 77.64 |==================================================================== 3 . 77.91 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 0 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 11.59 |==================================================================== 2 . 11.62 |==================================================================== 3 . 11.62 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 80.06 |==================================================================== 2 . 80.05 |==================================================================== 3 . 80.14 |==================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 3 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 158.29 |=================================================================== 2 . 158.30 |=================================================================== 3 . 158.28 |=================================================================== Basis Universal 1.12 Settings: UASTC Level 2 + RDO Post-Processing Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 904.51 |=================================================================== 2 . 904.49 |=================================================================== 3 . 903.74 |=================================================================== SQLite Speedtest 3.30 Timed Time - Size 1,000 Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 75.29 |=================================================================== 2 . 75.36 |=================================================================== 3 . 76.25 |==================================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPOP Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2395940.24 |=============================================================== 2 . 1524653.46 |======================================== 3 . 1516168.50 |======================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SADD Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1951090.96 |=============================================================== 2 . 1959806.67 |=============================================================== 3 . 1951427.42 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: LPUSH Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1510008.08 |============================================================== 2 . 1527380.46 |=============================================================== 3 . 1518627.29 |=============================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: GET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 2301015.75 |=============================================================== 2 . 2132136.12 |========================================================== 3 . 2125085.74 |========================================================== Redis 6.0.9 Test: SET Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better 1 . 1703146.70 |=============================================================== 2 . 1714807.71 |=============================================================== 3 . 1704781.92 |=============================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Bedroom M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 0.659 |==================================================================== 2 . 0.657 |==================================================================== 3 . 0.658 |==================================================================== IndigoBench 4.4 Acceleration: CPU - Scene: Supercar M samples/s > Higher Is Better 1 . 1.485 |==================================================================== 2 . 1.496 |==================================================================== 3 . 1.490 |==================================================================== PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better 1 . 656714 |=================================================================== 2 . 655454 |=================================================================== 3 . 655467 |=================================================================== Sunflow Rendering System 0.07.2 Global Illumination + Image Synthesis Seconds < Lower Is Better 1 . 2.763 |==================================================================== 2 . 2.781 |==================================================================== 3 . 2.774 |==================================================================== BRL-CAD 7.30.8 VGR Performance Metric VGR Performance Metric > Higher Is Better 1 . 42083 |==================================================================== 2 . 41832 |==================================================================== 3 . 41850 |====================================================================