trial.resuts Intel Xeon W-2145 testing with a GIGABYTE MW51-HP0-00 (F2 BIOS) and NVIDIA Quadro K600 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.8 via the Phoronix Test Suite. trial_run: Processor: Intel Xeon W-2145 @ 4.50GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: GIGABYTE MW51-HP0-00 (F2 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Sky Lake-E DMI3 Registers, Memory: 252GB, Disk: 118GB INTEL SSDPEK1W120GA + 1024GB Samsung SSD 860, Graphics: NVIDIA Quadro K600, Audio: Realtek ALC1150, Network: 2 x Intel I210 OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.8, Kernel: 3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64 (x86_64), Display Server: X Server 1.20.4, OpenGL: 2.1 Mesa 10.4.3, Compiler: GCC 4.8.5 20150623 + CUDA 8.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160 PolyBench-C 4.2 Test: 3 Matrix Multiplications Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 2.978 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: ac Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 5.05 |============================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: air Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1.93 |============================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mdbx Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 5.18 |============================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: doduc Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 9.09 |============================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: linpk Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 4.37 |============================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: tfft2 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 49.91 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: aermod Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 9.55 |============================================================= Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: rnflow Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 10.09 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: induct2 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 24.78 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: protein Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 14.63 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: capacita Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 11.78 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: channel2 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 74.93 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: fatigue2 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 42.99 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: gas_dyn2 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 65.57 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: test_fpu2 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 39.85 |============================================================ Polyhedron Fortran Benchmarks Benchmark: mp_prop_design Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 97.38 |============================================================ BLAKE2 20170307 Cycles Per Byte < Lower Is Better trial_run . 4.26 |============================================================= GNU GMP GMPbench 6.1.2 Total Time GMPbench Score > Higher Is Better trial_run . 5597 |============================================================= Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 2322.57 |========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1105.17 |========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1288.81 |========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1945.23 |========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 5528.77 |========================================================== Java SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1744.84 |========================================================== Bork File Encrypter 1.4 File Encryption Time Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 6.687 |============================================================ Fhourstones 3.1 Complex Connect-4 Solving Kpos / sec > Higher Is Better trial_run . 12550.8 |========================================================== BYTE Unix Benchmark 3.6 Computational Test: Dhrystone 2 LPS > Higher Is Better trial_run . 39548918.2 |======================================================= CacheBench Test: Read MB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 3793.87 |========================================================== CacheBench Test: Write MB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 31697.24 |========================================================= CacheBench Test: Read / Modify / Write MB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 51840.73 |========================================================= LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1535.90 |========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 540.02 |=========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 324.11 |=========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1379.12 |========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 3747.08 |========================================================== LuaJIT 2.1-git Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1689.18 |========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Composite Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 700.16 |=========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Monte Carlo Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 135.92 |=========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Fast Fourier Transform Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 178.26 |=========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Sparse Matrix Multiply Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 804.19 |=========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix Factorization Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1104.98 |========================================================== SciMark 2.0 Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxation Mflops > Higher Is Better trial_run . 1277.44 |========================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: KASUMI MiB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 93.22 |============================================================ Botan 2.13.0 Test: AES-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 4315.28 |========================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Twofish MiB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 376.32 |=========================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: Blowfish MiB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 447.83 |=========================================================== Botan 2.13.0 Test: CAST-256 MiB/s > Higher Is Better trial_run . 144.63 |=========================================================== Swet 1.5.16 Average Operations Per Second > Higher Is Better trial_run . 763630993 |======================================================== Node.js Octane Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better trial_run . 42861 |============================================================ Numpy Benchmark Score > Higher Is Better trial_run . 303.05 |=========================================================== Gzip Compression Linux Source Tree Archiving To .tar.gz Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 36.34 |============================================================ dcraw RAW To PPM Image Conversion Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 37.46 |============================================================ DeepSpeech 0.6 Acceleration: CPU Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 111.59 |=========================================================== FLAC Audio Encoding 1.3.2 WAV To FLAC Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 10.14 |============================================================ LAME MP3 Encoding 3.100 WAV To MP3 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 10.29 |============================================================ GnuPG 1.4.22 2GB File Encryption Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 11.68 |============================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Graceful Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 46.53 |============================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Solitaire Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 63.69 |============================================================ Minion 1.8 Benchmark: Quasigroup Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 101.26 |=========================================================== OpenCV Benchmark 3.3.0 Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 80.95 |============================================================ Radiance Benchmark 5.0 Test: Serial Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 720.77 |=========================================================== Sudokut 0.4 Total Time Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 13.90 |============================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 1 MB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 404 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 2 MB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1246 |============================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 3 MB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1864 |============================================================= System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 5 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 3 |================================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 50 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 18 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 100 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 68 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 112 MB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 57774 |============================================================ System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 150 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 56 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 200 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 82 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 250 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 94 |=============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 300 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 124 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 350 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 136 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 400 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 247 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 450 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 175 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 500 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 303 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 550 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 217 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 600 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 364 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 650 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 256 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 700 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 264 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 750 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 296 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 800 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 308 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 850 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 505 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 900 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 366 |============================================================== System Libxml2 Parsing Filesize: 950 KB ms < Lower Is Better trial_run . 371 |============================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: cos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 32645.0 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: exp nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 22083.7 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffs nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1.94880 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sin nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 32688.4 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: log2 nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 8.73816 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: modf nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 2.61771 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 13.40 |============================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sqrt nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1.94783 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: tanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 13.47 |============================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: asinh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 19.25 |============================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: atanh nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 12.00 |============================================================ glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: ffsll nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 2.16827 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: sincos nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 32399.8 |========================================================== glibc bench 1.0 Benchmark: pthread_once nanoseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1.96376 |========================================================== libjpeg-turbo tjbench 2.0.2 Test: Decompression Throughput Megapixels/sec > Higher Is Better trial_run . 197.11 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Atol Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 59.02 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Ctype Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 28.78 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Math Library Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 422.70 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Random Numbers Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 948.36 |=========================================================== CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Vector Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 84.67 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Function Objects Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 14.24 |============================================================ CppPerformanceBenchmarks 9 Test: Stepanov Abstraction Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 31.84 |============================================================ Optcarrot Optimized Benchmark FPS > Higher Is Better trial_run . 79.66 |============================================================ PyBench 2018-02-16 Total For Average Test Times Milliseconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 1106 |============================================================= Hierarchical INTegration 1.0 Test: FLOAT QUIPs > Higher Is Better trial_run . 455537074.56 |===================================================== NGINX Benchmark 1.9.9 Static Web Page Serving Requests Per Second > Higher Is Better trial_run . 23503.93 |========================================================= PHPBench 0.8.1 PHP Benchmark Suite Score > Higher Is Better trial_run . 242660 |=========================================================== Git Time To Complete Common Git Commands Seconds < Lower Is Better trial_run . 55.52 |============================================================